On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 3:37:17 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 2:58:24 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
If you find a thread 'depressing', why do you read it, when you don't have to?

Well, not being psychic I was not aware of it's pointlessly repetitive content until I'd read it. It started fine with clear responses from RedAcre, Stephen, Bernard, Alan & others, and then should have stopped.

What, you didn't read your own post about complaining about contributions to another thread? Sorry, I was under the impression you wrote it.

Now you've completely lost me. I haven't made a post in the 'Cold Radiation' thread, and where I have named people in this thread I was positive.

The title of group moderator doesn't have an owner on usenet and never will.

What the f**k are you on about now?! What the hell has that got to do with my post? (Which unlike yours contained some reference to the weather).


To explain: your post contained reference to 'cold radiation' in title and content and you whined about not being happy about the 'cold radiation' thread's length. Hence my 'group moderator' comment.

Still can't see the connection, please up your medication.

I think if anyone had any needed to object to my post it was Alistair, but he was polite as always. You chose to make an irritating dig as you have made a habit of in many of my posts, no one else who contributed to the Cold Radiation post felt the need to. All this because I complained at the needless length of a thread!

Please feel free to write whatever you wish,

Thank you

F*ck Off pr*ck

Graham
Penzance






:-)