The answer is jet stream, now what's the question?
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 1:14:51 PM UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 11/08/2015 22:55, Freddie wrote:
Dawlish Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 12:37:59 PM UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
"xmetman" wrote in message
...
Idiot.
Why?
------------------------------------------------
He isn't, but I think from a neutral point of view I would like to know
what aspects of a the jet stream were monitored. It is a complex thing
after all. Just as "... till the models show 80% consistency" is too
broad a statement and could mean anything - but then I wouldn't respond
"idiot" to that either although some might, oh hang on ..... that
wouldn't really work ;-).
Dave
Anyone who believes in 'cold radiation' and thinks that centrifugal force exists is a scientific idiot. The mere idea of this one 'monitoring the jet stream' makes me laugh out loud. *)) Sorry if that doesn't go down well, but after his prognostications recently, He's an idiot to me, when he talks about anything scientific.
|