On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:22:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect.

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

Yawn. Still sore about being shown up quite a long time ago now, aren't you?

Now understand this. I'll post how I like, when I like and I won't be in any way influenced by someone like you mitchell. Exactly the same rules for anyone else too. It's newsgroup; not a forum and each individual speaks for themselves, not for others.

Got it now?