Very slightly interesting developments at T+240
On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 7:40:47 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 6:56:25 PM UTC, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 11:29:21 AM UTC-5, Dawlish wrote:
True. On the NASA site, the number of files are huge.
========
The number of files "IS" huge, not "are".
Stephen.
Stephen, please do not correct his grammar. Only he is allowed to do this to others, have you learnt nothing? (He's in education you know).
It's also probably worth pointing that whilst this thread now covers 240 hours of trying to spot something vaguely interesting in 240 hours time, there has in fact been a very interesting 240 hours of weather. Something Dawlish may have missed by trying to spot something 240 hours in advance and posting to this thread 24 times!
In fact it's been a truly remarkable December.
Graham
Penzance (A very windy, wet & miserable day)
|