On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 2:47:35 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:37:30 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 2:23:20 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 07:14:36 UTC, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:09:40 -0800 (PST), Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Friday, 22 January 2016 08:28:40 UTC, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:08:13 -0800 (PST), Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



The whole thing is absolutely bizarre with thes people.

The only "bizarre" people are those who write and believe in the above nonsense.

Mr Olgilvie, or should I call you Dawlish. What do you actually disagree with?

I disagree with people who can't spell my name and I disagree with people who are stupid
enough to believe that I am Dawlish. And if they're stupid enough to believe that AND to
keep on attempting to argue against the incontrovertible evidence for AGW, then they fully
deserve the epithet "idiot".

But I never denied global warming did I Ooglevie,we all know the planet has warmed....

Do you? Why do you quote whatever you can to attempt to tell us that it has not warmed since 1998, that the evidence backs this and thus there is no need to examine a cause?

That's why you get called, quite correctly, an idiot.

But it has warmed but 2015 isn't the hottest, t was an attempt to push home what transpire s anyway to be the feeble agenda of the Copthat Paris fossil burning shebang.

Why do you feel the need the lie and twist the troth so when you by your own lifestyle example feel that AGW is not a problem?

You proof that you are using renewable energy supplies like solar and wind then at least I would respect your position. But for now the only wind your associate with is that flatulent blast that that is ever present as you continue to talk out your arse.


By the way : I note that you answered on Talcum's behalf rather swiftly.

Idiot.