On Monday, 25 January 2016 19:02:15 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:55:59 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 06:55:36 UTC, dawlish wrote:
I'm someone you don't like Hughes.

I'm sure there should be a comma after "like" otherwise your posting makes no sense at all. Considering your status as head of OFCOMMA I find this rather surprising but I'd temporarily forgotten about your innate hypocrisy. It happens with age, y'know. Anyway, I'll put one in for you. Tappity-tapitty tap. There it is. Ah! I can now see what you're saying and can only reply that I'm pretty mainstream in that respect.
Just a thought; why do you bowl me these donkey-drops?

Tudor Hughes.

Difficult to get away from this one, hughes; isn't it?:

**No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.**

How this will haunt you. Leave; your integrity is shot.



At least Tudor has integrity, unlike you. You know I plan to retire in the coming months and will carry out a lifetimes ambition to visit Dawlish. Would you be prepared to show me around Paul, with me being an idiot and that..