On Wednesday, 6 October 2004 10:44:56 UTC+1, Gianna Stefani wrote:
"Alan LeHun" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

live web cam of the mountain at

http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/volcanocams/msh/

Looking interesting now.

You've missed it. What you're seeing now is just remnants. Should have
seen it an hour or two ago. It got quite dark.


All I can see on that link is multi-coloured munge .... tried with Firefox
and IE

Gianna

A bit of a trip down memory lane on here. Anyone know if these people still exist anymore?

Sadly, Martin Rowley's remarks seem to have given birth to that gob**** garvey,whose command of atmospheric science consists of knowing how to read, copy and paste but not how to think:

Not think: How small a large mountain is in reference to a line of longitude and latitude.
How relatively little of it emits noxious fumes.
How rarely and,
how little monitored,
how largely covered in cloud they are (the fact that they are mountains being too far into the realm of meteorology perhaps for his delicate tread to follow?)
How long ago since satellite analysis was first used.
How few records were archived and how little the philosopher had to go on and what empty fruits they willed on a world of flowerpotmen.

But most of all:
How much is credited to the least credible of all climate data: Statistics.

And the one person making the effort to analyse weather charts through all of it, in all of it, is not engaged in debate with any of it.

Am I the only one who really cares or am I the only one who cares to actually know?
Or am I both?

Goodbye Gianna and good luck.