On 11/03/2016 22:06, Jumper wrote:
On 11/03/2016 17:17, Alastair wrote:
On Friday, 11 March 2016 12:43:57 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:

What ever is agreed surely with the third world econmies growing like
they are we haven't got a hope in hell of reducing Co2 levels. Thatr's
not to say we are ALL to blame as we all like using are phones and
computers and cars.

Whatever you believe we will all pay in the end.

Even if the third world economies were not growing, do you really
think that we would reduce our emissions? We are still trying to grow
our economy. Even the new left wing leadership in the Labour Party are
advocating that. Expand the economy and you have more cars on the road
and more carbon emissions.

Until the scientists realise the disaster we are all facing, e.g. half
the global population dying of starvation, and warn the public of the
dangers, then that disaster is inevitable.

But some, even here, are peddling complacency and apathy. No wonder
the politicians and public can't see the catastrophe ahead. When they
do wake up to the dangers it will be too late!


World oil would've run out by the middle of this century so with no oil
driven vehicles, boats, trains or planes it should give the planet to
recover.

You know after this sentence I was actually surprised to see you saying
something sensible for once.

Unless humanity is so stoopid that it replaces oil driven
vehicles, boats, and trains by steam driven vehicles, boats, and trains
run by coal.

Then I read this sentence. Oh dear oh dear oh dear....
Nornal service is resumed!
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg