On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 11:42:15 PM UTC+1, Martin Dixon wrote:
In message
Paul Garvey wrote:

The scientific method does not require proof. Indeed, proof is
impossible. If you are not convinced by the avalanche of evidence, you
have moved beyond sceptic and onto denier territory.

If not CO2, what else? Evidence for that, not speculation, like larrys
silly denier foray into underwater volcanoes.


Yes, it doesn't prove anything. But a bit like evolution, the best
theory we have is generally accepted, even if it has its flaws.

--
Visit my weather station at
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/m.dixon4/Cumulus/index.htm

Believing is the start of everything to come. - Hayley Westenra

You dodged the question. If not CO2, what else?