So Brooks was right about strengthening upper winds resultingfrom global warming?
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 4:14:08 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 13:15:37 UTC+1, Paul Garvey wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 2:42:40 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 March 2016 12:52:17 UTC+1, Paul Garvey wrote:
I have much to say but I'm keeping quite .
What you just did is called conflation. I call it far right wing idiocy and complete denial. Funny though.
PS I'm keeping quite well too.
I know exactly what I'm talking about........hilarious. You have no idea what conflation means, do you. Do look it up before your reply. Here's your original statement:
'Martin although OT&OT your remark "not enough to support disabled people" although a good point in highlighting money wasted of AGW subsidies'
Now it is disabled people's allowances and AGW. The way people like you tie your different and often hugely conflicting agendas and justify things to yourselves in your tiny little far right wing little minds is nothing short of appalling. You are stupid, aren't you. larry?
What I've said is absolutely true. True, or otherwise, that's not the point. It's the stupid conflation with GW, which you *still* don't understand you tried. It's as if GW dominates any thinking you attempt.
|