On Monday, 23 May 2016 11:55:40 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
It's very tempting to permanently cut out a load of vapid drivel, but I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how.

I have in the past. It takes time and effort. Then I've monitored his usually unintelligible output.


I think rupert is refering to a killfile, which makes your response
rather amusing.

Thanks for appending this as I didn't particularly want to reply to a troll.. The fact is that my long lists of responding to my own posts is down to being killfiled on so may scientist's computers. The only one to respond to my post after the Sinabung eruption was Dawlish.

He asked me a question in the usual empty headed way and I responded thus: "I will answer all your questions if you will answer one for me."

dagshish: "No. I'll just monitor whatever forecasts you make that appear intelligible. OK? Well, if its not, you have no choice. I'll do it anyway. [He seems to enjoy stabbing himself all over with a well armed locust with many pains. 1 Timothy 6:10]

This one he '...there is a slim chance of a large earthquake tomorrow' isn't a forecast, it's a piece of hopefulness, based on the fact that it could happen anyway, but that needs pointing out and that needed to be exposed.

Actually, that's been the case in all your forecasts. They've all been hopeful, as your methods clearly don't work. Goodbye until the next one it's possible to decipher."

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...er/CiQiLapsihs

..there is a slim chance of a large earthquake tomorrow' isn't a forecast,

If that isn't a forecast it explains why dag never makes them . He has no idea what a forecast is. Instead of responding to a troll with violence it is an easy matter to chase it away with a suitable intelligent question.

Something the flowerpotmen on here might learn from: Thinking long enough about what you think you know may be painful initially but if you are more creditable than a wet sheep you will get a taste for asking intelligent questions.

The alternative is to create bigger and less credible lies.
Feel free to comment there if you like, it is the whole idea of the forum after all. Not killfiles. I recall a story about the man who first submitted a paper on light waves interrupting the second man to see such things:

"Yes he is right" he said upsetting the real scientists there, for he had only been allowed into their hallowed hall on condition he remained silent: "For I have seen them!"

So much for the Royal Society of antisocialists. The thing is; we obviously don't need them.