On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 11:29:03 AM UTC-4, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 11:57:50 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 22:05:30 UTC+1, Sir Jim Cannon wrote:
The Brittish naturists health has really suffered suince he came out against the global warming frausdters 3 years ago. Lets HOPE hes made of sterner stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuYEJTtbG94

I've looked and can find no reference anywhere to Bellamy's health. He does have a website which is co-run by him and Dr jack Barrett

Jack Barrett is a PhD, not a medical doctor. He was the author of an early sceptic paper which is essentially correct!

Barrett (1995) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...4853994E0110Va

Both Sir John Houghton and Keith P. Shine replied but their objections were mainly appeals to authority. More correspondence followed which the editor finally ended siding with Barrett. It was the editor's opinion which stopped me rejecting the paper out of hand, as Houghton and Shine had done.

Of course, that paper is not the whole story because CO2 is causing global warming, but it does show that the computer models are fatally flawed.

Cheers, Alastair.

========

Your link does not work, I'm afraid.

Which are the authorities to whom Houghton and Shine appeal? Are they fallacious appeals?

What do you mean by the word "fatally"?

Thanks,

Stephen.