View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old June 15th 16, 04:20 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Weatherlawyer Weatherlawyer is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default One for the flowerpeople

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 11:24:20 UTC+1, RW wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 03:43:17 UTC+12, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 12:08:41 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://list.msu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=in...&F=&S=&P=18002
Never let the dew settle on them.


In fact the success of democratic government as well as the prosperity of the individual may be said to depend upon the ability of the people to distinguish between real science and fake, between the genuine expert and the pretender.

Edwin E. Slosson, founding editor: Science Service.

I wonder what he would have had to say about the Michael mannky hokey trick.


The ration of ignorant rant quantity to verifiable factualness is, in your case, so large that one can understand why transfinite numbers were dreamed up.


At the risk of wasting my time asking questions of one as illustrious as your you yourself:

Have you any idea where the World Meteorological Organization's Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 1999 and the graph that they showed along with it came from?

(A word of advice: Do the expected thing and ignore me, I will go away I promise.)