On Friday, 29 July 2016 21:20:55 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I watched the sky clear the same way it builds this evening. Over towards the Shropshire border got brighter as the afternoon got later. It was interesting to see how the striations develop. I walked home contemplating the effect of the insolation of the individual huge buoyancy units overhead.

I wonder why climatologists can's see how the angle of incidence affects the heat system they study so inefficiently. They DO want a solution do they?

I wonder if it is the sun as NASA insists or the abundance of carbondioxide that will be producing the cycle of localised cooling here and Worldwide?

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=88454

Needless to say the idots on here won't be watching anything like that. What do you suppose this means:
"Coccolithophores make their shells out of one part carbon, one part calcium, and three parts oxygen (CaCO3) “This carbon will eventually be respired as microbes break it down, typically at depth,” she said. “And that adds to an oxygen draw-down.”" or are we supposed to not suppose?

Let's just get this equation straight: one part carbon dioxide, one part calcium oxide, makes (CaCO3) and yes it does contain and three parts oxygen. But why are they behaving like fox news and slavery?