On Friday, 19 August 2016 08:03:15 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
One for Lawrence.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...thoroughly-fab
ricated-the-truth-about-global-temperature-data/


How firmly in your cheek was your tongue with that bag of ****?

Do you really think that respected scientists would resign/ create a plethora of blogs/ demand accountability if the problem wasn't systemic?

Does anyone think that it was really a difficult problem for Phil Jones to reply to emails?

As if he didn't have a secretary and any amount of flowerpots to do his bidding!
And finally... Did the article have anything to say about the low grade staff at the IPCC shuffling all their statistics?
And crucially:
How can any of them be trusted after the Climategate affair?
Nobody in their right minds could trust Doctor Jones unless it was to doctor records.