On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 11:19:53 AM UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 10:53:47 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:
You might find this interesting, if a little out-of-date.

http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom...ers=10rain&b=1

You can switch between the old rainfall map & the modern one by using
the 'change transparency of overlay' slider.

I finally know why Capil Curig is so wet!


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Paul

I knew about this site, but had never noticed the 1881-1915 rainfall overlay.

Of course this begs the question if we have rainfall data to produce such a detailed map as this why do the Met Office only have a gridded data series that extends back to 1910?

Bruce.

A detailed map doesn't necessarily equate to accuracy. The MetO produce detailed actual and anomaly maps each month, showing rainfall in great detail over west Cornwall for instance. But where are the actual rainfall reports from? just Camborne & Culdrose. This can lead to some highly inaccurate maps, especially in summer. It was the extreme inaccuracy of these maps a few years back, that led me to realising Scilly was double recording rainfall. It still took them nearly 6 months from the time I reported it to correct it. The only reply I ever got was an unofficial private one, giving the reasons for the problem, in some detail - it was both interesting and disturbing (total lack of any reasonableness checks). I never got an official response.

It meant that the 'actual' figure for the Penzance area, presumably computed in some way from the Camborne & Scilly figures and a relief map, was 30% or so high for several months.

Graham
Penzance