On Sunday, 25 September 2016 18:01:50 UTC+1, wrote:
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 16:04:23 UTC+1, Col wrote:
On 25/09/2016 14:05, wrote:


Your idea of cold radiation is simply preposterous and it would need the second law of thermodynamics to be re-written. I can assure you that physicists would not do that for your idea. Time to recognise that and stop believing in this nonsense. Or, endure ridicule.

There is absolutely no need for ridicule.
As this is a scientfic newsgroup then debate, even robost debate, is all
that is necessary to get ones point across.
You don't have to mock the person you disagree with.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Cold radiation? In the face of every physicist on earth and established scientific law, accepted by all in science? Cue flat earthers? Do they not deserve ridicule? Or how about creationists? You wouldn't ridicule either of those points of view? Really? All these people are entitled to their opinion, but I can assure you they receive ridicule in scientific circles, as they have in this newsgroup. I'd always defend someone's right to their point of view, bit I'd always laugh at good comedy - as do others. That's why he has received ridicule on here - and certainly not just from me.

Thanks Dawlish. I was just meditating on the attacks I have made on you and realising that Jesus was sternly admonishing his followers from committing ad hominem attacks when he said we are not to describe anyone abusively.

I had been contemplating the downer of the day of having to apologise to a **** like you. But there wouldn't be much point to it, since he also instructed us to tell the truth.

Odd his opponents never realised that conundrum. Maybe they were like you; unable to see clearly because of the wool over their eyes.