Thread: Cold Radiation
View Single Post
  #292   Report Post  
Old September 28th 16, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Vidcapper[_2_] Vidcapper[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,066
Default Cold Radiation

On 28/09/2016 10:05, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 09:16:02 UTC+1, Graham Easterling
wrote:

I think Alistair's almost religious obsession with cold radiation
is forcing him toward a complexity in much the same way.


Graham,

"All objects emit radiation based on their temperatures - scientific
fact. If you have two objects then there will be two sets of
radiation - common sense. The hotter object will emit hot radiation
and the cold object will emit cold radiation - common sense. The hot
radiation will warm the cold object and the cold radiation will warm
the hot object - simple science."

What is complex about that? It is about as simple as you can get.

It is Dawlish's obsession with making me look a fool which is in
partly driving me to try and clear my name, not some religious
idealism. However, only the very brightest here seem capable of
accepting simple arguments like that above.

It seems as if this newsgroup seems is driven by a herd mentality led
by Dawlish.

"I can't believe it."


It's not a binary situation though - just because Dawlish disagrees with
you, doesn't mean we agree with *him*.



--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham