Thread: Superquakes
View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 16, 07:50 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
[email protected] pjgno1@hotmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2016
Posts: 465
Default Superquakes

On Sunday, 2 October 2016 04:14:55 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:35:46 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 1 October 2016 11:40:37 UTC+1, School wrote:
On Saturday, 1 October 2016 10:50:11 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I don't suppose there is anyone on here besides myself that knows anything about forecasting super-quakes is there?
The trouble with thamaturgy is the modest ones, such as myself, have a tendency to think small. It isn't that we do so in the hope of getting away with it, so much as not wishing that others get the impression that we enjoy it all.

As a matter of fact I do get a kick out of my faith in god being proved correct. But on the other hand; like the man who got a chronic injury fighting angels, it isn't all hoppity skippity and dancing all night long.

How often is it that we have these things?
Every year is it?
I am sure that someone who knows a lot about earthquakes and statistics will be along to tell us all soon enough.

Given his track record, I have to admire his ability to stand his ground with all four legs in the air and a "take me, you wolf" look in his eyes.

All the better to admire your ability to debunk your idiocy with a modicum of monitoring. It's not difficult.


Ew! Gwrandwch; what big caggles you've got.


The usual idiocy. You've no comeback, because you know full well that what I'm saying about your links between these elements is completely destroyed by your complete inability to forecast anything, based upon your methods.

Forecast with even a small degree of accuracy and I will change my mind.