On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 22:12:33 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Keeping off the grass is not something that means a lot to cyclones at Cape Horn. That is because it doesn't matter what the pressure is on Antarctica, it has to get the hell out of the way of a twin cored cyclone.

If you have been following the dispensations of BoM's Southern Hemisphere you will be familiar with the recent patterns of cyclones going ashore. And how they relate to derechos and volcanics.

It is unusual for long standing periods to occur when such cyclones reach the coast. For reasons best known to god, things have changed.

Notice how that huge system between Australia and Antarctica develops into what appears to be a blocking low on Saturday the 8th of October, 2016.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/...ANTI/track.dat

What has happened is that the cyclone hitting the Cape has gone ashore, all the way across the continent causing the South African cyclone to deepen and draw out the High into itself.

The development along the coast from the air between 100 to 120 East is the most interesting thing. It all takes place at the same time as the compression of the Scandinavian High drops it 10 millibars from 150 to 140 (which is quite a lot of high pressure all things considered.) As far as that is possible to know:

Of course this is all speculation based on forecasts. Fortunately there is little input from the flowerpotmen in this series, so we can rely on generalities out that distance, for a given reliance on generalities.

So, now we come to the geography of jumpstates. It helps if you imagine the stable points in physics the gravity wells of Lagrangian Points as parallelogrammes rather like Feynman diagrammes.

In the beginning god started out with an amorphous mass of energy neutral chaos, think of that as a state of collapse, as a place with no polarities; where everywhere is an equal temperature and pressure described as the "ground state".

If you introduce enough spin to any part of it then every part of it must polarise. Would it be easier to think of creation as **** happening?

It certainly seems to be the state of the art in politics and finance six millennia after Adam.

Watch how the spaces between the deepest cyclones on here react to the change in polarity or energy values:

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/char...Refresh+ View

They are huge neutral areas portrayed computationally as paralellogrammes that never seem to shrink more than the spaces between discs. It is easier to think of them as the eyes of the cyclones since most of those are "blind" most of the time.

They are the places where great forces are polarised. If you direct a jet of liquid or gas onto a solid object whose plane is 90 degrees to the stream, the pressure has to escape equally on all available directions and it does this instantly.

What happens is that as the wave set up from the confined mass escapes, it rolls past the ejecta in the way, as its force is distributed/lost. It has a vortex. And this is the same in all directions altering as the rate of perpendicular pressure on that region.

The pressure in these cases is what happens when adjacent winds develop next to one another. It is very simple physics and is well know when any single vortex is studied at its core.

You can see much the same thing as water pours into a bucket; more clearly as it falls onto a flat shelf and escapes. If the source is small and the landing area large the flow rate can be adjusted to produce a variety of shapes.
Criticality.

We already know that cyclones develop their power from the forces they already contain through the redistribution of heat as pressure. They are walking bombs. Now all we have to do is find out what happens to the noise they make: AKA Follow The Money.

Or as the Proverbs say about such continnua: As the **** from the manger, is the wealth to the farmer.