On Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:27:24 UTC, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 6:55:35 AM UTC, wrote:
On Saturday, 18 February 2017 03:34:21 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:

'Dawlish' - as always.

Oh and w and hughes have decided to hop into bed together. That's nice. 😂😂😂😂 (Cue abuse)

Yes, it's a pretty eclectic mix of people you've managed to bring together in their condemnation of yourself. You manage to abuse people from across the spectrum. The only ones missing are the people that never read your posts.

Poor old Crusader, I bet he didn't expect this.

I did recommend, in a stupid & arrogant reply you gave to one of my posts, that you **** off and go back to Weather & Climate. Perhaps you could please, and we could get back to discussing the weather.

Graham
Penzance

Yes, After your foul mouthed outburst, 'poor old Crusader' eh?

I stick up for the MetO against people like this who feel they have a right to feel they are somehow better. They are not. That was the point of my original post. There are some who really detest the MetO and use this newsgroup to say so at every opportunity. That is their right and I don't tell them to 'please f*** off' to another newsgroup. I argue, strongly, but without abuse and foul language, that they are wrong. May I not do this?

Usually these people used to work at the MetO and have become very distant after leaving/retirement, bacause the MetO no longer has to listen to them and they can't believe the organisation is functioning so well without them.. These people are critical of almost anything the MetO does. Will is an obvious example, but there are others too.

PS I'll go where I like, dear boy, and not be dictated to by one such as yourself. You like to post, but not to have someone disagree with you and you feel people are 'arrogant and stupid' for doing so. In that, you are not alone and you have little idea how to cope with disagreement, same as them. That's not my fault, but expect a robust reply if you descend into abuse and become foul-mouthed to me, won't you? 😀😀