On Saturday, 20 May 2017 04:57:17 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 19 May 2017 19:26:35 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 14:25:28 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
6.2M. 39km S of Namatanai, PNG 2017-05-15 at 13:22.
5.6M. 67km SE of Inarajan, Guam. 5.6 2017-05-16 03:56.
14 1/2 hours. Is that fundamental for a solid wind to blow?
Like trying to watch the busy angels' flying toes. Dancing how only god knows. Trying to time the dance.
the last gale force quake is now 4 hours into 3 days ago. How many hours is that?
https://wordpress.com/post/weatherch...press.com/5936
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/170514_rpts.html
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/170515_rpts.html
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/170516_rpts.html
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/170517_rpts.html
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/170518_rpts.html
I believe this broke the spell:
5.9M. 23km S of Loay, Philippines 2017-05-20 01:06.
5.6M. 67km SE of Inarajan, Guam. 2017-05-16 03:56.
In the same way that the 14.5 hours between the latter quake to this: 6.2M. 39km S of Namatanai, PNG. set off the tornadoes in the USA.
3 hours short of 5 days. That is about the time it takes for an anticyclone to cross a continent. There must be a magic number somewhere along there that indicated peak activity in one mountain before it is shared by others?
How do we find out what it may be?
If weather has averages does symmetry equal volcanoes?
This is mainly affected by the five day wave that becomes a Bermuda or a Greenland High.
Maybe the cyclogenesis or is it cyclosis behind a polar front is more appropriate here?
On Sunday, 21 May 2017 05:15:39 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Take a quick look at Iris at the moment:
http://ds.iris.edu/seismon/?
It looks like the Atlantic is in development.
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...-61.100,20.823
Precyclogenesis: 2017-05-20
5.7M. 52km NW of Cintalapa de Figueroa, Mexico. at 17:58.
4.7M. 243km SSW of Manzanillo, Mexico. at 16:58.
Keep a spare cursor on the Gulf of Mexico for the next few days. (If you have a desktop computer. If you don't have a desktop computer, get one! If you can't afford one tell god you think you need one and would like to find out why.)
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...130.251,46.741
I have been watching the spot where the last storm over Vanuatu peaked and I think I see the relationship between warm-pools and Polar Fronts:
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...61.369,-54.568
Also this stuff may explain the Equatorial counter current.
Remember the rain from storms only goes to about 2500-3000 feet. The water from volcanoes goes as high as the Space Station. Ash only reaches a mile maximum unless it turns into meteorites and come down in their own due time.
I don't see anyway to prove most of this but for now it appeals to my logic:
https://www.volcano-adventures.com/a...re-travel.html
Only exists to make volcano tourism work. They have no way of keeping any handle on things either. Try John Seach's site.
The discerning geologger ill have no difficulty drawing a not unreasonable conclusion about the relationship between earthquake swarms and Polar Lows when they read in Wikileaks that:
"Polar lows were first identified on the meteorological satellite imagery that became available in the 1960s, which revealed many small-scale cloud vortices at high latitudes."
Since this was the era when the new web of seismographs was being set up. One may well wonder how it has not been observed that more often than not these swarms tend to follow tropical storms.
But it takes all sorts does it not?