On 10/07/2017 17:14, Will Hand wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Freddie wrote:

On Monday, 10 July 2017 15:34:24 UTC+1, Graham P Davis wrote:
On 09/07/17 19:44, Norman Lynagh wrote:
Graham P Davis wrote:

On 09/07/17 13:18, Ron Button wrote:
The old scientific law of "what
goes up must come down" was used to explain how at least half the sky
would be be cloud-free due to the descending air
The descending air doesn't necessarily occur in the vicinity of the cloud
formed by the ascent of the air, though. I used this argument when I was
being trained, but was told to carry on using the rule of thumb (I didn't!).
I can see the logic behind what you are saying, but I would argue that it
only applies to cumulus of limited vertical and horizontal extent - which is
probably more often than not. I can't see any problem with reporting 8/8 Cu,
but I would expect to only do it when the air was unstable to some depth, and
I would expect to be reporting precipitation at the same time.


As a fully trained observer I can say that if the sky is 8/8 full of cloud and
it is raining you cannot report Cu as you cannot see what cloud it is. In
observing you observe what you see not what you expect or what you know from
the situation. 8/8 Cu and raining would normally be reported as 8/8 St or 8/8
Ns. Actually 8/8 Cu would be a socking big Cu :-)

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I agree with you Will, at best it would be 8/8 Cb rather than Cu. This
assumes that previous obs were reporting convective cloud.