View Single Post
  #88   Report Post  
Old August 8th 19, 09:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather,uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2011
Posts: 29
Default [CC] UN: Climate disaster predictions from 30 years ago

On 07/08/2019 11:46, RedAcer wrote:
On 07/08/19 11:03, Brian Reay wrote:
On 07/08/19 10:50, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
wrote:

On 06/08/2019 13:36, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

It has been conclusively shown that in the real world, it does not.

Prove it! There is a Nobel Prize waiting for anyone who can
demonstrate that the prevailing orthodoxy on climate change is wrong.

Would that that were the case. What is actually waiting for any such
person is the sack, oblivion, and removal of any and all status as a
researcher, including prospects for future grants.

That is what awaits any nay-sayer of the current orthodoxy (an
interesting word to choose to use, too, I venture to suggest).


Anyone remember David Bellamy? He dared to question those promoting man
made global warming etc and was promptly sidelined by the BBC etc. Prior
to that, he was extremely popular. Unlike Attenborough, Bellamy is a
real scientist, not a jumped up presenter.


No one is 'promoting' that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It's is a scientific
fact.


Ther is no such thing as a scientific fact. CO2 acts as a mild
insulator. That is just a fact. It is possible to calculate its effect.
It is negligible.

In order to make it scary it has to be multiplied bu 'positive feedback'
no evidence of this has ever been found, in fact it seems more likely
that the climate has large negative feedback in it.


It's nor even clear taht there hgas been any 'global warming' - just
warming in and outside te cities where people have buildt weather
stations...





--
"It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"