On 07/08/2019 13:11, JGD wrote:
On 07/08/2019 11:59, Spike wrote:

Primary effects are eg:

1. Yes, global temperature is increasingly inexorably;

No, it isn't.

2. Yes, CO2 release associated with human activity seems to be the main
driver, though other gases, reduction of polar albedo etc may become
increasingly important.

No, it almost certainly is NOT.

3. One unarguable effect of higher temperatures (barring eg a succession
of episodes of major volcanic activity) will be melting of the polar
icecaps on a human timescale, with sea-level rise and all the
consequences that brings.


Polar ice is incerasing
You dont melt greenlands kilometers thick icecap in less than a thousand
years.


Secondary effects are all the other things like increases in extreme
weather events, changes in weather patterns for given localities etc
etc.

All shown to be false

The scientific jury is still out on some of these and evidence
swinging one way and then another on some poorly-understood secondary
effect does not 'disprove' current climate change theories. (Though we
can be pretty certain that higher temperatures will bring changes to
local weather patterns (maybe the northern UK will be cooler for a while
as the Greenland icecap melts?), there will be more moisture and energy
in the atmosphere etc.)


Go and study the real evidence, not the BS you have been fed by the media


--
“A leader is best When people barely know he exists. Of a good leader,
who talks little,When his work is done, his aim fulfilled,They will say,
“We did this ourselves.”

― Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching