On 07/01/2020 16:02, Graham P Davis wrote:
On 06/01/2020 09:12, Spike wrote:

"It" appears to have got bad enough that the climate catastrophe
industry now has to be fronted by a schoolgirl variously described as
Aspergic, OCD-suffering, and depressive, rather than in this case by
scientists proving that their climate models have finally matched the
reality.

A few months ago, I completed a test for autism. A score of 16 was the
average. 80% of autists scored 32 or more. I scored 36. This was judged
to indicate the high probability of me being autistic. As I also have an
IQ in the top 1%, this would have classified me as an Aspie under the
old system (Asperger's is no longer a separate classification so I would
be simply marked as autistic). I have also suffered from clinical
depression for at least forty years. I therefore find your remarks
insulting and disgusting but sadly unsurprising.

Well, diagnosed autism runs in my close relatives, and my IQ is in the
top 2%. I've never suffered from depression. So what now?

I am also a scientist, having specialised for several years in
climatology, with special regard to Arctic Ice, and and have previously
demonstrated to you that climate models have been correctly forecasting
the effects of CO2 on global temperatures for several decades. However,
you continue to bury your head in the sand. I have no objection to you
continuing to do that but just wish that you would desist from spreading
your ill-informed ideas on a scientific newsgroup.

You, nor anyone else, has proved my 'ideas' to be wrong - or even
responded to them.

http://www.scarlet-jade.com/science/...limate-change/

Have you thought of changing your interests to an area that attracts
fewer doom-mongers?

--
Spike