A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause
it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

goodnight

Your humour is about as interesting as your yenc arguments.


No argument, just an observation ;-)

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:59 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

Peter, I'm not sure why my photo bored you, but having had a look at
the snapshots you have on your website, I don't think you're in any
position to criticise anyone else's photos.

Just an observation.

Steve

"SurveyHand" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:59 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause
it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

Peter, I'm not sure why my photo bored you, but having had a look at
the snapshots you have on your website, I don't think you're in any
position to criticise anyone else's photos.

Just an observation.

Steve

Careful Steve. I think you will find Peter is referring to Menno's comments
about your post being in yEnc. Those who routinely post that way say thay
are tired of hearing the complaints of those who can't decode it. I notice
you switched formats (to bring your pictures to the greatest number of
viewers.?). The normal yEnc user would never consider doing such a thing.
jim
who can now see those yEnc posts that are worth seeing...

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:40:53 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause
it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

goodnight

Your humour is about as interesting as your yenc arguments.


No argument, just an observation ;-)

You posted it at 5:34am, at which point I would have yelled at you for
waking me up 26 minutes before my alarm.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Gary Glitter has said if he gets executed he wants cremating and his ashes putting in an etch-a-sketch, so the kids can still play with him!

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:46:02 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:59 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

Peter, I'm not sure why my photo bored you, but having had a look at
the snapshots you have on your website, I don't think you're in any
position to criticise anyone else's photos.

Just an observation.

Steve

I was yawning at "TheCroW", and what the hell is wrong with my photos
anyway?
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

A woman calls a Contractor to her house to give her a bid on painting the interior of her house.
She takes him into the first room and tells him that she wants it painted pale green.
The contractor writes something down on his notepad, goes over to the window and yells down "Green side up!"
The homeowner takes him into the next room and tells him that she would like it painted rose colored.
The contractor again notes it on his note pad, goes over to the window and opens it. He then yells down, "Green side up!"
The woman was curious, but continued to show him the rest of the house.
In each room the contractor notes her color choice on his notepad and yells out the window, "Green side up!"
When the homeowner had completed the tour, she asked the contractor why he always yelled, "Green side up!" when she told him her color choice, when the colors were all different.
He laughed and replied, "I have a crew of blondes across the street laying sod."

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:48:56 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:46:02 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:59 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

Peter, I'm not sure why my photo bored you, but having had a look at
the snapshots you have on your website, I don't think you're in any
position to criticise anyone else's photos.

Just an observation.

Steve

I was yawning at "TheCroW", and what the hell is wrong with my photos
anyway?

If I misinterpreted your message then I apologize. In my defense, one
word posts are not always easy to understand.

Your photos are fine, the main thing is that you like them.

Steve

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:48:48 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:48:56 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:46:02 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0100, Peter Hucker
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:59 +0200, "TheCroW"
wrote:

A lot of people only will see a big garble of letters and numbers cause it's
posted as yEnc image.
If you post it in normal coded JPG, everybody can see it :-))

YAWN....

Peter, I'm not sure why my photo bored you, but having had a look at
the snapshots you have on your website, I don't think you're in any
position to criticise anyone else's photos.

Just an observation.

Steve

I was yawning at "TheCroW", and what the hell is wrong with my photos
anyway?

If I misinterpreted your message then I apologize. In my defense, one
word posts are not always easy to understand.

Are your messages not threaded, showing who replies to who?

Your photos are fine, the main thing is that you like them.

Then explain "having had a look at the snapshots you have on your
website, I don't think you're in any position to criticise anyone
else's photos."
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

A man was helping one of his cows give birth, when he noticed his 4-year-old son standing wide-eyed at the fence, soaking in the whole event. The man thought, "Great. He's 4 and I'm
gonna have to start explaining the birds and bees. No need to jump the gun - I'll just let him ask, and I'll answer."

After everything was over, the man walked over to his son and said, "Well son, do you have any questions?"

"Just one." gasped the still wide-eyed lad. "How fast was that calf going when he hit that cow?"

"Peter Hucker" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:48:48 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:
Your photos are fine, the main thing is that you like them.

Then explain "having had a look at the snapshots you have on your
website, I don't think you're in any position to criticise anyone
else's photos."
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

Peter,
Just as I knew what your "yawn" meant (threaded or not) I know what
generated Steves's comment (besides thinking yours was meant for one of the
more spectacular pictures posted here) My first thought on seeing your
photo website was "My God, this guy's posted every picture he's ever taken!"
and, like me, that means 99% chaff to 1% wheat. And completely without any
semblance of the organization that would make posting the chaff worthwhile.
Your site looks like the output of a one hour photo lab in a chain drugstore
with all the prints shuffled together and then randomly displayed. Put your
castles together, put your parrots together, put your racing together, etc.
etc. etc., then you will have a decent display of photos relevant to each
other. You have lots of good shots of lots of my favourite subjects but
right now who would take the time to know?
jim

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:30:38 GMT, "jim wilson"
wrote:


"Peter Hucker" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:48:48 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:
Your photos are fine, the main thing is that you like them.

Then explain "having had a look at the snapshots you have on your
website, I don't think you're in any position to criticise anyone
else's photos."
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

Peter,
Just as I knew what your "yawn" meant (threaded or not) I know what
generated Steves's comment (besides thinking yours was meant for one of the
more spectacular pictures posted here) My first thought on seeing your
photo website was "My God, this guy's posted every picture he's ever taken!"
and, like me, that means 99% chaff to 1% wheat. And completely without any
semblance of the organization that would make posting the chaff worthwhile.
Your site looks like the output of a one hour photo lab in a chain drugstore
with all the prints shuffled together and then randomly displayed. Put your
castles together, put your parrots together, put your racing together, etc.
etc. etc., then you will have a decent display of photos relevant to each
other. You have lots of good shots of lots of my favourite subjects but
right now who would take the time to know?

I do delete a whole load first. But I suppose I could do with sorting
it. If I can find some spare time.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

The boss arrived at the office one morning complaining of a headache.
His staff were sympathizing with him when the newly married office manager volunteered:
"Just last week I had a terrible headache, but my wife cured it very quickly.
It may seem an odd cure, but she took off all her clothes, pulled me down on the bed and in no time the pain was gone."
The bossed grabbed his hat and coat and said: "I've tried everything else, is your wife home now?"

"Peter Hucker" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:30:38 GMT, "jim wilson"
wrote:


"Peter Hucker" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:48:48 GMT, SurveyHand
wrote:
Your photos are fine, the main thing is that you like them.

Then explain "having had a look at the snapshots you have on your
website, I don't think you're in any position to criticise anyone
else's photos."
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

Peter,
Just as I knew what your "yawn" meant (threaded or not) I know what
generated Steves's comment (besides thinking yours was meant for one of
the
more spectacular pictures posted here) My first thought on seeing your
photo website was "My God, this guy's posted every picture he's ever
taken!"
and, like me, that means 99% chaff to 1% wheat. And completely without
any
semblance of the organization that would make posting the chaff
worthwhile.
Your site looks like the output of a one hour photo lab in a chain
drugstore
with all the prints shuffled together and then randomly displayed. Put
your
castles together, put your parrots together, put your racing together,
etc.
etc. etc., then you will have a decent display of photos relevant to each
other. You have lots of good shots of lots of my favourite subjects but
right now who would take the time to know?

I do delete a whole load first. But I suppose I could do with sorting
it. If I can find some spare time.
--
I look forward to checking out your photos "by subject". Say when.
jim