alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 15th 07, 05:48 AM posted to alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 23:03


4 tropical storms on the boards today. 2 of them super cyclones:
http://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/

Ordinarily, the time of the phase at around 23:00 would produce a
reasonably fine spell of British weather. Unfortunately all the steam
for this set up is taken up in a sump filled with powerful hurricanes.

We were supposed to have severe weather high winds and heavy rain. I
can't say it was much more than occasionally breezy here, though it
has to be said that winds are very rare in this region. And the
weather was on the wet side with a little drizzle.

The most noticeable thing was the overcast. I would have expected
misty weather. That would have been true had the cell active in the
Gulf of Mexico produced a respectable blow.

Still, it was all very informative.


  #2   Report Post  
Old August 16th 07, 10:36 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 23:03

On Aug 15, 6:48 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
4 tropical storms on the boards today. 2 of them super cyclones:http://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/

Ordinarily, the time of the phase at around 23:00 would produce a
reasonably fine spell of British weather. Unfortunately all the steam
for this set up is taken up in a sump filled with powerful hurricanes.

We were supposed to have severe weather high winds and heavy rain. I
can't say it was much more than occasionally breezy here, though it
has to be said that winds are very rare in this region. And the
weather was on the wet side with a little drizzle.

The most noticeable thing was the overcast. I would have expected
misty weather. That would have been true had the cell active in the
Gulf of Mexico produced a respectable blow.

Still, it was all very informative.


Forest fires and drought conditions still affect much of Central
Europe -at least they were shown on the same news bulletins that spoke
of the Peru Quake.

You can't trust British TV these days. Their moral value is on a par
with a leaking **** bag. (The BBC especially.)

What a great day for the New Labour Prats to bury bad news. Got a mass
epidemic of share values slumping and all sorts no mention of Iraq
though. Despite yesterday's events.

  #3   Report Post  
Old August 17th 07, 06:20 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 23:03

On Aug 16, 11:36 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 15, 6:48 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



4 tropical storms on the boards today. 2 of them super cyclones:http://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/


Ordinarily, the time of the phase at around 23:00 would produce a
reasonably fine spell of British weather. Unfortunately all the steam
for this set up is taken up in a sump filled with powerful hurricanes.


We were supposed to have severe weather high winds and heavy rain. I
can't say it was much more than occasionally breezy here, though it
has to be said that winds are very rare in this region. And the
weather was on the wet side with a little drizzle.


The most noticeable thing was the overcast. I would have expected
misty weather. That would have been true had the cell active in the
Gulf of Mexico produced a respectable blow.


Still, it was all very informative.


Forest fires and drought conditions still affect much of Central
Europe -at least they were shown on the same news bulletins that spoke
of the Peru Quake.

You can't trust British TV these days. Their moral value is on a par
with a leaking **** bag. (The BBC especially.)

What a great day for the New Labour Prats to bury bad news. Got a mass
epidemic of share values slumping and all sorts no mention of Iraq
though. Despite yesterday's events.


And as if one disaster after another were not bad enough, the rescue
party that went into a collapsed mine in Utah yesterday have
themselves fallen victim to a fresh collapse.

An editorial seems to blame a moon calf:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/edito...l?nav=rss_blog

I knew the moon was somewhere behind it.

Nothing about any air disasters yet. That shoe is yet to drop, I
suspect. And of course a ferry disaster of some sort, somewhere or
other. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...:27&version=49

(Just thought I'd throw that link in for the sake of one or two dolts
on s.g.e.)



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017