If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:
http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

On Oct 26, 10:29 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

WL, What the heck does that mean? Why is Oct 11 worthy of
comparison? Why not the 14th or 6th? If you can explain that, it
might help us take your England-centric seismic forecasting a _little_
more seriously.

Also, please define: 'NZ cell', "_some_ seismic activity", "wind up to
a shoe". Does any of that mean something in your language? If so,
spell it out in clear English that the rest of us can understand. If
that's not possible, please let the rest of us know where you're
getting those extremely powerful, but obviously not fatal, drugs.

Don't know if you're old enough the remember George Carlin's 'hippie
dippie weatherman' whose forecasts consisted of the obvious like,
"tonight's forecast -- dark" but you're getting more and more like
him, prognostically and pharmaceutically. Time to dry out?

--mirage

On Oct 27, 3:15 am, mirage wrote:
On Oct 26, 10:29 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

WL, What the heck does that mean? Why is Oct 11 worthy of
comparison? Why not the 14th or 6th? If you can explain that, it
might help us take your England-centric seismic forecasting a _little_
more seriously.

Also, please define: 'NZ cell', "_some_ seismic activity", "wind up to
a shoe". Does any of that mean something in your language? If so,
spell it out in clear English that the rest of us can understand.

We normally get a series of dull overcast spells in October or
November. However when these occur in a spell that the moon has one of
its phases at around 5 o'clock, there must be a complex system in
place to manage this.

I have no intention of promulgating idle theory referring to the
mechanics of the processes involved.

I haven't forgotten that a lot of internet users are
UnitedStatesofAmericans. These people, despite needing legal pieces of
paper for obtaining drugs, are not able to afford these drugs or get
the pertinent pieces of paper legally. They have now instituted a
fierce war on a culture that grows opiates freely.

Both countries involved in that war consist of citizens who can't
afford to see a doctor of medicine.

And I am the whacky one?

The date refers to the time of the lunar phase. You could have found
that out for yourself had you followed the link, you lazy dolt. No
wonder a chimp rules your country unimpeded.

Faxai is the name of a tropical depression that seems to be the most
likely storm to.....



Ah, RTFM.

On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...5?pageNumber=2

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?

Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...5?pageNumber=2

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?

The first may have been a 1 in 100 but the second was a 1 in 110 and the
third a 1 in 102 etc..

On Oct 28, 7:28 am, Reader in Invisible Writings
wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...8420071025?pag...

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?

The first may have been a 1 in 100 but the second was a 1 in 110 and the
third a 1 in 102 etc..

Are you reading between the lines again?

Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 28, 7:28 am, Reader in Invisible Writings
wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.
Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt
Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:
"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...8420071025?pag...
I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?
The first may have been a 1 in 100 but the second was a 1 in 110 and the
third a 1 in 102 etc..

Are you reading between the lines again?

No, just making a quick comment. People forget that if you lined all
'annual events' up in magnitude sequence you would have events from 1 in
1 to 1 in 1000 and nothing to prevent two 1 in 100+ happening
sequentially or even in the same year. Like all these things (we had
some devastating inland floods this year in the UK) you can never spend
the right money. If the resources cope with spare capacity, you have
wasted money, if they fail to cope you have not spent enough. If both
happen (river bursts its banks but the sea defences don't get wet) you
have spent the money on the wrong thing, until you have a tidal surge
during a drought and then the sea defences fail whilst the river did not
need all that money spent on it.

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:51:37 -0700, Weatherlawyer
wrote:

On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...5?pageNumber=2

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?


We also have 100 year floods, but I can't remember having more than
two in any one year.

On Oct 28, 7:41 am, Charles wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:51:37 -0700, Weatherlawyer



wrote:
On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...8420071025?pag...

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?

We also have 100 year floods, but I can't remember having more than
two in any one year.

Lies, damned lies and statistics!

On Oct 28, 6:51 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 26, 5:29 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

If October the 11th was any date to go by, this day's spell (Oct 26th
04:52 http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html)
should produce a couple of powerful storms off Asia that cascade into
some seismic activity around that NZ cell I mentioned a few days back.

Faxai is looking for a wind up to a shoe in:http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt

Upper air conditions seem to have kiboshed things for now. Here is an
interesting, if logical concept about once in an hundred year types
storms:

"If we are going to keep having 100-year fires every four years, we
have to dramatically adjust our perception of what the fire danger is
in California and provide staffing, resources, equipment and training
to meet those needs," Wills said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/market...8420071025?pag...

I believe I have already had this conversation. It's not an irregular
occurrence in magical coincidence either, is it?

Just had a patch of very wet weather. It looks a lot brighter now that
the gloom has cleared. The Countryfile forecast (the last fairly
decent weather forecast on British TV) stated the weather should
bevcome part of an Atlantic High from Monday.

So where did this bad weather come from?

(Now to go and see if there be spiders.)