alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 1st 07, 08:49 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

1st November 21:18. This phase should be not unlike the one for
October 19th. Sorry I can not elaborate.

No doubt you are all waiting on tenterhooks, whatever they are.
Personally.... I am off to bed.

Night all.


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 07, 06:56 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 1, 9:49 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

1st November 21:18. This phase should be not unlike the one for
October 19th.


Definitely got disasters in it. Saffir Simpson cyclones too. One from
a storm that couldn't really make it in last weeks formation.

It's also tried to form striations but failed to make anything
dramatic -except for a splendid sunrise and sunset of course.




  #3   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 07, 07:36 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2007
Posts: 18
Default 21:18

On Nov 2, 12:56 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 1, 9:49 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



1st November 21:18. This phase should be not unlike the one for
October 19th.


Definitely got disasters in it. Saffir Simpson cyclones too. One from
a storm that couldn't really make it in last weeks formation.

It's also tried to form striations but failed to make anything
dramatic -except for a splendid sunrise and sunset of course.


So to be clear, since you are posting this prediction to an earthquake
board, please confirm that you are not predicting anything relative to
earthquakes? And that if you were predicting anything about
earthquakes in any way, you would say so precisely and explicitly?

And, if this prediction has nothing to do with earthquakes, would you
explain why you feel to compelled to post it to an earthquake
discussion board?

--mirage

  #4   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 07, 01:35 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 2, 8:36 pm, mirage wrote:
On Nov 2, 12:56 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Nov 1, 9:49 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:


1st November 21:18. This phase should be not unlike the one for
October 19th.


Definitely got disasters in it. Saffir Simpson cyclones too. One from
a storm that couldn't really make it in last weeks formation.


It's also tried to form striations but failed to make anything
dramatic -except for a splendid sunrise and sunset of course.


So to be clear, since you are posting this prediction to an earthquake
board, please confirm that you are not predicting anything relative to
earthquakes? And that if you were predicting anything about
earthquakes in any way, you would say so precisely and explicitly?

And, if this prediction has nothing to do with earthquakes, would you
explain why you feel to compelled to post it to an earthquake
discussion board?

--mirage


No.

  #5   Report Post  
Old November 4th 07, 02:22 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 2, 7:56 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

1st November 21:18. This phase should be not unlike the one for
October 19th.


Definitely got disasters in it. Saffir Simpson cyclones too. One from
a storm that couldn't really make it in last weeks formation.

It's also tried to form striations but failed to make anything
dramatic -except for a splendid sunrise and sunset of course.


OK, one storm taking over from another with a 6M quake thrown in;
that's turned back the clock 3 hours. The weather is decidedly misty
but is this the sort expected from a lunar phase at 5 or 11 o'clock at
this time of year? Or is it the type of spell produced when the time
of the phase is at 6 or 12 o'clock?

But it's difficult algebra as the permutations are not for storms in
the same basin.



  #6   Report Post  
Old November 4th 07, 03:50 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

From another group:

On Nov 4, 4:19 pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
12Z GFS is predicting storm force 11 NNW'ly down the North Sea late Thursday
into Friday. East coast of UK and Holland could be battered. Turning very cold
too with sleet and snow showers in north-eastern Britain. Folk in SW England
will be wondering what all the fuss is about with just cooler air, sunshine and
fresh NW winds.


As I said in a previous thread, there looks to be more in the offing.

Thursday is the 8th and the next lunar phase is on the 9th. Nice
timing. Looks just like I said it would. Of course being sensible I'll
wait for the 10th to claim my hit.

That should rattle the fools some.

  #7   Report Post  
Old November 4th 07, 07:20 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 4, 4:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
From another group:
On Nov 4, 4:19 pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
12Z GFS is predicting storm force 11 NNW'ly down the North Sea late Thursday
into Friday. East coast of UK and Holland could be battered. Turning very cold
too with sleet and snow showers in north-eastern Britain. Folk in SW England
will be wondering what all the fuss is about with just cooler air, sunshine and
fresh NW winds.


As I said in a previous thread, there looks to be more in the offing.

Thursday is the 8th and the next lunar phase is on the 9th. Nice
timing. Looks just like I said it would. Of course being sensible I'll
wait for the 10th to claim my hit.

That should rattle the fools some.


If this turns out to be Noel going home, then the rethink I was
considering has to be rethought.

First of all the obvious. Psychologically, humans generally have a
flair for seeing that things are working correctly by just zenning it.
Whatever that "it" might be. It's that certain "Je ne sais pas quoi"
that god gave man no doubt to help him expand paradise.

It runs along the lines of the KISS principle. And it is probably why
a poor education is no stumbling block to a successful business life.

It also prevents those locked into a wrong idea from gaining to much
ground over the dispossessed.

So here we go with the latest from the greatest:

It looks like Noel is going to go home on Scotland or Norway. This
gives us (that is: me) the Weatherlawyer principle that occluded
fronts doing what they do best, supply water to the likes of me for
instance, if not exactly giving vent to earthquakes, do provide a
method for their forecast.

But we knew that already; so what is new?

The storms in the Asian Pacific give vent to that cell of seismicity
in the region of New Zealand and that ocean south of the Marshall
Islands.

Obvious really and I wondered why I never thought of it before. And
then I remembered that I did. Sort of. Sometime in 2003 IIRC. My
sincerest thanks to all those helping me with this theory and I am
sure that all the souls saved late in 2004 would have been equally
grateful.

Or not as the case will never be known.

  #8   Report Post  
Old November 4th 07, 07:43 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 4, 8:20 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Psychologically, humans generally have a
flair for seeing that things are working correctly by just zenning it.
Whatever that "it" might be. It's that certain "Je ne sais pas quoi"
that god gave man no doubt to help him expand paradise.

It runs along the lines of the KISS principle. And it is probably why
a poor education is no stumbling block to a successful business life.

It also prevents those locked into a wrong idea from gaining too much
ground over the dispossessed.


The original rethink was something about the malpractice of fishing.
Poor sea husbandry has stripped the oceans of their wildlife and
stopped the fixing of carbon dioxide...

....thus the yang for that ying is.... wait for it, wait for it...

(I know the answer, I know the answer. You-oo don't... haha!)

  #9   Report Post  
Old November 6th 07, 05:43 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 21:18

On Nov 4, 8:20 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 4, 4:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

From another group:
On Nov 4, 4:19 pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
12Z GFS is predicting storm force 11 NNW'ly down the North Sea late Thursday
into Friday. East coast of UK and Holland could be battered. Turning very cold
too with sleet and snow showers in north-eastern Britain. Folk in SW England
will be wondering what all the fuss is about with just cooler air, sunshine and
fresh NW winds.


As I said in a previous thread, there looks to be more in the offing.


Thursday is the 8th and the next lunar phase is on the 9th. Nice
timing. Looks just like I said it would. Of course being sensible I'll
wait for the 10th to claim my hit.


That should rattle the fools some.


If this turns out to be Noel going home, then the rethink I was
considering has to be rethought.

First of all the obvious. Psychologically, humans generally have a
flair for seeing that things are working correctly by just zenning it.
Whatever that "it" might be. It's that certain "Je ne sais pas quoi"
that god gave man no doubt to help him expand paradise.

It runs along the lines of the KISS principle. And it is probably why
a poor education is no stumbling block to a successful business life.

It also prevents those locked into a wrong idea from gaining to much
ground over the dispossessed.

So here we go with the latest from the greatest:

It looks like Noel is going to go home on Scotland or Norway. This
gives us (that is: me) the Weatherlawyer principle that occluded
fronts doing what they do best, supply water to the likes of me for
instance, if not exactly giving vent to earthquakes, do provide a
method for their forecast.

But we knew that already; so what is new?

The storms in the Asian Pacific give vent to that cell of seismicity
in the region of New Zealand and that ocean south of the Marshall
Islands.


Looks favourite for Friday: Either that will tell us I am right or
wrong. Or not as the case may be. Very entertaining, any way. My
sincerest regrets to all caught up in the turmoil of course. I can
only stand by and watch pointing futilely at the bloody obvious.

Western North Pacific area tropical cyclone summary:

06:00 typhoon 21w (Peipah) was located near 18.4 N. 118.6 E.
Approximately 270 nm NNW of Manila, Philippines,

Maximum sustained surface winds were estimated at 70 knots
gusting to 85 knots.

http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/ab/abpwweb.txt




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017