Weather Banter

Weather Banter (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/)

- alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/alt-talk-weather-general-weather-talk/)

- - 22:32 (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/alt-talk-weather-general-weather-talk/119800-re-22-32-a.html)

On Nov 17, 6:13 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Time to go over a few things.

So many perspectives, so little concentration. And while I am
mesmerised, it isn't that different from one in September nor the one
below it in October.

Somethging that was rattling my cage in the middle of September just
came back to me earlier:

"

On Sep 16, 10:45 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Terms I need to look further at are the obvious And ? and And ??
spells. I plainly don't know what they do. But also what is the term
"weak spell"? These "And ?/??" spells are very strong ones for the
regions they impact the most, the Pacific and Indian Oceans, where
they produce some pretty fierce storms.

A weak spell is one where the thrust of the heavy of fine weather is
spent elsewhere to the British Isles. That makes them similar to the
"And ?/??" things, doesn't it?

Is a phase that occurs at or near twenty minutes past or twenty
minutes to an hour that otherwise places a spell well within my call
such a difficulty maker? If so, why?

Shadow Zones.

These are known to impact the behaviour of earthquakes and they derive
from the phenomenon of the disappearance of certain earthquake wave
forms at just over 105 to just under 135 degrees away from the
epicenter. A lesser known fact outside hallowed grounds for geologists
is that they don't appear at epicenters either.

So if the harmonic for the phases such as that of the 23rd of August
centres it some 50 minutes from the UK, and the effect of that 50
minutes is some 100 to 200 degrees of arc, then the anticyclone is in
outr shadow zone. Is that not so?

If the time was directly related to the position of the sun and moon
as taken from a nautical almanac, the high would be just short of 15
degrees of longitude west of the UK. But if there is a multiplication
as might be seen with a previous effort at decoding these harmonics,
then the time translated to distance, might be 100 to 200 hundred
degrees. That is 7 to 13 time zones.

(Seeing it written like that "7 to 13 time zones" makes it a little
clearer. There is that magic numerology all over it. 7 and 13. Wet
spells.)

Is that reasoning too difficult to follow?"

Do you like talking to yourself? Haven't you noticed yet that
99% of your posts are ignored?

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Skywise wrote:

Do you like talking to yourself? Haven't you noticed yet that
99% of your posts are ignored?

And you had to stop him achieving 100%. Spoilsport!

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman, not newsboy.
"What use is happiness? It can't buy you money." [Chic Murray, 1919-85]

Graham P Davis wrote in news:5qcv9tFukds2U1
@mid.individual.net:

Skywise wrote:

Do you like talking to yourself? Haven't you noticed yet that
99% of your posts are ignored?

And you had to stop him achieving 100%. Spoilsport!

Naw...I saw a couple other replies to him first.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On Nov 20, 5:45 am, Skywise rained dull
incendiaries onto my solarschisms, weather or no I was deserving. :
Graham P Davis Knowing Fukds2U1
@importanceRus mellifoliated thus:

Do you like talking to yourself? Haven't you noticed yet that
99% of your posts are ignored?

Whatever my reasoning, for a certainly there is no-one to compare to
me. So with what could anyone reply?

And you had to stop him achieving 100%. Spoilsport!

Naw...I saw a couple other replies to him first.

Not on this thread.

On Nov 21, 4:20 am, Skywise wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote in

Whatever my reasoning, for a certainly there is no-one to compare to
me. So with what could anyone reply?

tsk tsk....You've left yourself wide open on that one....

But I'll be nice. I'm in a decent mood. :)

No need. But you might add something to the ideas part of the thread
if you have any input. Otherwise leave me to my idle misapprehension.