alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 17th 07, 10:24 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

On Nov 17, 10:35 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 17, 6:13 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



Time to go over a few things.


So many perspectives, so little concentration. And while I am
mesmerised, it isn't that different from one in September nor the one
below it in October.


Something that was rattling my cage in the middle of September just
came back to me a couple of hours ago:

On Sep 16, 10:45 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Is a phase that occurs at or near twenty minutes past or twenty
minutes to an hour, that otherwise places a spell well within my ability
to call, such a difficulty maker?


If so, why?


If the harmonic for the phases centres it some 50 minutes from the UK
and the effect of that 50 minutes is some 100 to 200 degrees of arc,
then the anticyclone is in our shadow zone.


Is that not so?


If the time was directly related to the position of the sun and moon
as taken from a nautical almanac, the high would be just short of 15
degrees of longitude west of the UK.


But if there is a multiplication....
then the time translated to distance might be the one or two hundred degrees


....that gives us the 4 hours difference in the apparent time of the
lunar phase that we get when there are severe tropical cyclones...

That we have had recently at some one or two hundred degrees
distant....

....that gives me all that fing angst in the first place.



  #2   Report Post  
Old November 18th 07, 07:27 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

On Nov 17, 11:24 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

But if there is a multiplication....
then the time translated to distance might be the one or two hundred degrees


...that gives us the 4 hours difference in the apparent time of the
lunar phase that we get when there are severe tropical cyclones...

That we have had recently at some one or two hundred degrees
distant....



So here I am at 08:00 GMT sitting in the dark waiting for the day to
get going, which it might do around midday -at which time,
...... it starts to get dark.

The earthquake cell in South America is looking to cross the Andes
having come out of nowhere to strike the Pacific sea port of
Antofagasta last week.

Everybody loves the sound of a train in the distance?

With the local national forecasts answering to the various models in
use, Lee and Guba weakening and no other storms boding, I wonder what
is next.

What is creating the Low pressure incursion here where the Azores High
and the European one are both pretty strong and extensive:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
(Lots of mice in that nest though.)

I have always considered the lunar phase time of 10:30 to be a seismic
code red.
But I can't remember why.
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 18th 07, 11:27 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

Lee has been joined with a new kid on the block: 04S.
http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm

Well I said it would be interesting.
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 18th 07, 12:04 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

On Nov 18, 12:27 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Lee has been joined with a new kid on the block: 04S.http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm

Well I said it would be interesting.


And bugger me but this morning's rain has turned into this afternoon's
sleet. looks like all the chumps on uk.sci.weather were on the money
as usual too.
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 19th 07, 01:47 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

On Nov 18, 1:04 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:27 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Lee has been joined with a new kid on the block: 04S.http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm


Well I said it would be interesting.


And bugger me but this morning's rain has turned into this afternoon's
sleet.


I wish I knew how to predict snow. But in the UK we only get the
slushy type that is permanently miserable.

Meanwhile over in the Asian Pacific region, there are now four
cyclones where yesterday there were only two.



  #6   Report Post  
Old November 19th 07, 07:38 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes, uk.sci.weather, alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 22:32

On Nov 19, 2:47 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Meanwhile over in the Asian Pacific region, there are now four
cyclones where yesterday there were only two.


2007/11/19 00:52
6.3 M. 21degrees South. 179 degrees West. Fiji Region.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_all.php

We have had at least one earthquake at 6M. or higher since the Chilean
event. This one at least should be associated with the demise of a
supercyclone to the north of it.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017