![]() |
Weather reports
I often wonder why different sources of local weather reports vary so
much. I check Weather Underground and the Weather Channel on the web. For example, the other night WU predicted 29, WC 40. I often see such differences. Also, one will say clear, the other cloudy. Always differences. Sometimes one will be close, sometimes the other. The local radio stations predict yet other different weather. sigh Evidently weather prediction is far from an exact science. -- "When you choose the lesser of two evils, always remember that it is still an evil." - Max Lerner |
Weather reports
On Dec 30, 2:03 pm, Ken wrote:
I often wonder why different sources of local weather reports vary so much. I check Weather Underground and the Weather Channel on the web. For example, the other night WU predicted 29, WC 40. I often see such differences. Also, one will say clear, the other cloudy. Always differences. Sometimes one will be close, sometimes the other. The local radio stations predict yet other different weather. Evidently weather prediction is far from an exact science. It never can be while the best weather models require human input as a form of governor. The input comes from an experienced meteorologist but it is still weather-lore. Without that weather-lore, all weather models will run off like headless chickens. Which indicates the answer to your question. What corrections do the relative predictions normally get? Radio and TV presenters often add their own interpretation so depending on their location and experience, they will tend to be most accurate if they live in similar regions to you. Another reason that models go awry and can not be corrected by human intervention is when there are earthquakes due. All models tend to disagree and some will actually break down when large (or local?) quakes are due. |
Weather reports
Weatherlawyer wrote in
: On Dec 30, 2:03 pm, Ken wrote: I often wonder why different sources of local weather reports vary so much. I check Weather Underground and the Weather Channel on the web. For example, the other night WU predicted 29, WC 40. I often see such differences. Also, one will say clear, the other cloudy. Always differences. Sometimes one will be close, sometimes the other. The local radio stations predict yet other different weather. Evidently weather prediction is far from an exact science. It never can be while the best weather models require human input as a form of governor. The input comes from an experienced meteorologist but it is still weather-lore. Without that weather-lore, all weather models will run off like headless chickens. Today one report source says 25 - 35 MPH winds, the other 5 - 10 MPH. sigh Which indicates the answer to your question. What corrections do the relative predictions normally get? None I am aware of. I don't get on line after noon and the local radio gets its weather somewhere else. Radio and TV presenters often add their own interpretation so depending on their location and experience, they will tend to be most accurate if they live in similar regions to you. The local weather reports during the evening news (National Public Radio) are just read from copy - the reader knows nothing about weather. I never watch TV. Another reason that models go awry and can not be corrected by human intervention is when there are earthquakes due. All models tend to disagree and some will actually break down when large (or local?) quakes are due. That's something that bothers me. We used to get a trembler at least every year, sometimes several. I can't remember one now for well over ten years. I suspect the next one will be a beaut! I live in SW Arizona. -- "When you choose the lesser of two evils, always remember that it is still an evil." - Max Lerner |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk