January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available he
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

On Jan 7, 11:06*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

Hi Michael,

There's always a degree of uncertainly in weather forecasts and there
always will be. Just put a hill between here and there and what you
get on one side of course is much different from the other.

So does a hill in the western US receive more rain on the west side or
the east side?

No prizes offered here either.... LOL

Petra

On Jan 8, 7:13 am, Petra wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

Hi Michael,

There's always a degree of uncertainly in weather forecasts and there
always will be. Just put a hill between here and there and what you
get on one side of course is much different from the other.

So does a hill in the western US receive more rain on the west side or
the east side?

Nice to have you and Don back.

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html shows what is
actually happening in the US. It's a mixture of recent satellite
pictures and contours where the similar pressure data is joined up.

I imagine that is the most accurate method of representing mesoscale
outlooks. Anything more detailed would require experienced input.

But the above is plenty to forecast large magnitude earthquakes.

It just requires a more diligent hand than mine to make sense of them
and we will then be able to forecast them fairly accurately.

On Jan 7, 11:27*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 8, 7:13 am, Petra wrote:





On Jan 7, 11:06 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

Hi Michael,

There's always a degree of uncertainly in weather forecasts and there
always will be. *Just put a hill between here and there and what you
get on one side of course is much different from the other.

So does a hill in the western US receive more rain on the west side or
the east side?

Nice to have you and Don back.

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat...loop.htmlshows what is
actually happening in the US. It's a mixture of recent satellite
pictures and contours where the similar pressure data is joined up.

I imagine that is the most accurate method of representing mesoscale
outlooks. Anything more detailed would require experienced input.

But the above is plenty to forecast large magnitude earthquakes.

It just requires a more diligent hand than mine to make sense of them
and we will then be able to forecast them fairly accurately.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thank You Michael,

Rocky the Seismo Pup and I are glad to be with you today.

I have to disagree with you in your supposition that weather in the
short term has any affect on earthquakes with two exceptions,
geomagnetic storms and hurricanes as I have seen the effects of
geomagnetic storms triggering eathquake events many times over and the
effects on land masses from the uplifting of the crust from hurricanes
often ignites minor earthquake activity near the outer bands of
coastal hurricanes.

As for the rest, you'll need to clarify your position on routine
weather patterns.

Petra

On Jan 8, 7:06 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

I'm surprised that there wasn't a large mag for the hurricane force
winds that blew through Britain yesterday. Perhaps the occluded front
aimed at Scandinavia tomorrow:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm will produce the absent
miscreant.

Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this
spell:

6.4 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
6.1 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
6.4 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG

I think there will be an earthquake some time in the next 7 hours that
will
destroy the Golden Gate Bridge.

- Tom



On Jan 10, 1:32*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 8, 7:06 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one
is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK
but from where though?

Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall..htm
What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be
replaced by deep lows to our north.

On the TV storms and snow are forecast.

There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on
weather discussions here.

No prizes for guessing what that means.

I'm surprised that there wasn't a large mag for the hurricane force
winds that blew through Britain yesterday. Perhaps the occluded front
aimed at Scandinavia tomorrow:http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htmwill produce the absent
miscreant.

Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this
spell:

6.4 * * 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
6.1 * * 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
6.4 * * 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG

On Jan 10, 9:32 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this spell:

6.4 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
6.1 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
6.4 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG

I think it is a pity that one has to share Usenet with idiots. I don't
mind so much their idiocy but intrusion.

Still, I am without peer so should be content with my abilities and
rescind my deprecation of lesser mortals and their ancillaries.

In the meantime, a Low Pressure system sitting on the east coast of
the USA is stifling any seismic developments for the moment:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

Which is not to say that these air pressure systems do actually fuel
earthquakes and the like. It is just part and parcel of the same cause
and effect -or lack thereof.

There is flooding in some parts of Britain, large parts of Central
East Africa (around Lakeland.)

Thaws have occurred in North America and yet there is still plenty of
snow in many areas there and Europe, Scotland included.

Even Iraq has had some. The first time in living memory for some
places there.

So seeing as this drastic reaction to last week and beyond's cold
weather has taken place, where is the concurrent earthquake?

Unfortunately there doesn't apear anything special he
http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080102

Which just leaves tornadic activity and above cloud lightning. Unless
we are about to receive a visitation from the subversive gods.

On Jan 11, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

In the meantime, a Low Pressure system sitting on the east coast of
the USA is stifling any seismic developments for the moment:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current
chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an
high 5.

On Jan 12, 7:31 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current
chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an
high 5.

Nope.

Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes.

Awk'd bass'ds.