alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 12th 08, 11:53 PM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 11, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

So seeing as this drastic reaction to last week and beyond's cold
weather has taken place, where is the concurrent earthquake?

Unfortunately there doesn't appear anything special hehttp://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080102

Which just leaves tornadic activity and above cloud lightning. Unless
we are about to receive a visitation from the subversive gods.


I have just had a look at a Google email dated 8th January:

http://www.wandtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7590156
http://www.rrstar.com/multimedia/x531360995?pop=true
http://www.wisn.com/news/14996323/detail.html
http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs...ING01/80107047
http://www.kspr.com/weather/blog/13506712.html

All links to stories of recent US tornadoes.

On the money as usual. Good ol' Mike.

6 more from one dated the 9th, so probably more on the same lines. One
or two with good pictures though:

http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/N...Y&pageId=3.2.1
http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/myfox/pa...Y&pageId=3.2.1
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...QsANQD8U1RJL02
http://www.wlky.com/news/15005624/detail.html
http://www.rrstar.com/multimedia/x546810146?pop=true
http://wkbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=7594215

  #12   Report Post  
Old January 13th 08, 08:28 AM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 12, 11:51 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html


Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart
on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5.


Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes.


It seems that the highs might slough off from the Canadian border or
maybe even further north.

Should be interesting.

Meanwhile the Scandinavian High has now become the East Siberian High
and all the Low Pressure that normally feeds in from the Atlantic has
been restored:

http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/analysis/947_50.gif

No occluded fronts though. I suppose that is a good thing?

I wish that that last chart was a little easier to decipher. Would it
cost an arm and a leg to colour the land mass?
  #13   Report Post  
Old January 14th 08, 12:13 PM posted to alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 13, 12:53 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



So seeing as this drastic reaction to last week and beyond's cold
weather has taken place, where is the concurrent earthquake?


Unfortunately there doesn't appear anything special hehttp://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080102


Which just leaves tornadic activity and above cloud lightning. Unless
we are about to receive a visitation from the subversive gods.


I have just had a look at a Google email dated 8th January:

http://www.wandtv.com/Global/story.a.../13506712.html

All links to stories of recent US tornadoes.

On the money as usual. Good ol' Mike.

6 more from one dated the 9th, so probably more on the same lines. One
or two with good pictures though:

http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/N...d=5425387&vers
http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/myfox/pa...tentId=5428739
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...QsANQD8U1RJL02
http://www.wlky.com/news/15005624/detail.html
http://www.rrstar.com/multimedia/x546810146?pop=true
http://wkbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=7594215


More from the last few days. No apologies for dead links. They worked
when I published them. But they are to newspapers:

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7009677219
http://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingn..._in_clark.html
http://www.wrn.com/gestalt/go.cfm?ob...8B707F20502B7C
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...tornado10.html
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/j...nado_11008.php
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/...ml?source=mypi
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...QsANQD8U3AS5G1
http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/13686592.html

http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/N...Y&pageId=3.2.1
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ornado11m.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=4119740&page=1

http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/N...Y&pageId=3.2.1
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ornado11m.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=4119740&page=1
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/76272/To...ental-villages
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/...EWS01/80112014
http://www.lex18.com/Global/story.as...15842&nav=EQlp
  #14   Report Post  
Old January 14th 08, 01:02 PM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 13, 9:28 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html


Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart
on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5.


Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes.


It seems that the highs might slough off from the Canadian border or
maybe even further north.

Should be interesting.


This spell's tribulations were flooding in the UK and central Africa
as well as tornadoes in the US and Philippines. Perhaps interesting
was not the best word to use.

Something mor academic in these though:

2008/01/14
5.4 01:20. SOUTH WEST INDIAN RIDGE

2008/01/13
5.3 12:15. LUZON, PHILIPPINES
5.1 11:16:36 -16.000 -173.063 10.0 TONGA

2008/01/12
5.0 22:44. INDIA-BANGLADESH BORDER REGION
5.2 10:13. KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA
5.5 08:32. SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS REGION

2008/01/11
5.0 04:43. SOUTH OF JAVA, INDONESIA

2008/01/10
6.3 01:37. OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

The Oregon quake occurred on the last day that an high left the east
coast of the USA. (That's as near as I can tell from the Unisys site.)

If I am right, it is more circumstantial evidence that there is a
direct relationship between the two phenomena. What is a problem is
that the times involved don't seem to tie them in all that closely.

However the Unisys charts are filled in by meteorologist working to
schedules and data that is not as demanding as whatever it is in them
that relates to seismic activity.
  #15   Report Post  
Old January 14th 08, 11:00 PM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

15th Jan (19:46) So this is the last day of a most interesting spell.

Unfortunately the next one is somewhat similar, so expect very little
change in the GEM and GFS charts.

11:37 is as near to noon as 19:46 is to 18:00 as damn it is to
swearing. And the expected situation on this chart:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html
at these times is:
A standing Low Pressure area situated somewhat to the left of the
Great Lakes.
With a complex set of High pressure areas trying to break through from
the west.

And I know what you are all thinking...
"Why don't the two of them get together and blow each other out?"

And the answer is:
Because if they did that then the weather in the troposphere would be
no different from the weather above the tropopause.

And I know what you are all thinking now......
"Why didn't you think of that?"

And the answer is:

..

..

..

..

..
Because you are all a bunch of lemons.


  #16   Report Post  
Old January 15th 08, 06:48 AM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 15, 12:00 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

15th Jan (19:46) So this is the last day of a most interesting spell.

Unfortunately the next one is somewhat similar, so expect very little
change in the GEM and GFS charts.

11:37 is as near to noon as 19:46 is to 18:00 as damn it is to
swearing. And the expected situation on this chart:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html
at these times is:

A standing Low Pressure area situated somewhat to the left of the
Great Lakes.
With a complex set of High pressure areas trying to break through from
the west.


However it isn't as cut and dried as all that. Consider:

http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
And all the northern hemisphere seems covered in a double Low pattern
that is balanced by a double High situation that is a macrocosm of
what this type of spell should ordinarily be producing over the UK.

This spell and the next is normally one where two Highs and two Lows
are counterpoised around the UK with the centre of the effect being
known as a "col".

Usually the situation is speared by ridges or troughs from the
dominant air mass.

I am not sure (too inexperienced) to say how unusual this present
situation is but in lieu of a decent hurricane at lower latitudes, I
imagine this pattern is a decent substitute that explains the present
situation in Britain:
Flood Warnings.

Something similar on the Canadian-US border:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/
where winter weather watches are in effect. (Strong winds, snow and
ice.)

And no sign of things changing much on this:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

Which is tantamount to saying that with an East Siberian High, a North
Pacific Low and and Arctic Low in situ; no Highs on the US mainland
are going to find their way into the North Atlantic and.....
No severe earthquakes are going to trouble the Aleutians.

Or not, as the case may be.
  #17   Report Post  
Old January 15th 08, 10:07 PM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

On Jan 15, 7:48 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

11:37 is as near to noon as 19:46 is to 18:00 as damn it is to swearing.


And the swearing being:
"What the hell was I thinking when I wrote that."

(Good job nobody reads my stuff.)
  #18   Report Post  
Old January 15th 08, 10:13 PM posted to alt.talk.weather, sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 11:37

19:00 on this site we lose a significant High:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

And just for the purpose of making me look like an even bigger idiot:

2008/01/15
6.5 17:52 FIJI REGION

Well, at least they got the time down to something a little more like
it.
  #19   Report Post  
Old January 17th 08, 08:09 AM posted to alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2007
Posts: 45
Default 11:37


"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
...
January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the
US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell.

sNiP

Tornados are relatively common pretty much all year around in the southern
half of the US. However, there was an F-3 tornado in Wisconsin recently and
that has only happned once in the last 100 years, that is, a tornado. I'd
be willing to bet the last one that occured was nowhere near that strength.
F-3's are rare enough during the spring and summer months in the northern
states but during the winter, it's almost frightening.

As for now, most the the northern, central and east central US is poised for
the coldest air of the season, temps will reach -35F in many places and
below zero as far south as Kentucky. This was considered quite normal
during my youth but since the recent global changes in climate have occured
over the last 10-15 years, this weather could be considered quite cold. It
wasn't unusual at all in the 1970's and 80's (in Minnesota-where I grew up)
to have winters with over 100 inches of snow and extended periods of weather
that reamined below zero, even during the day. There has not been a severe
winter in Minnesota since the mid 1990's. As for northern Kentucky (where I
am unfortunately living now) we haven't had a significant snowfall in over
three years.

As for your other antics, this user does not care to comment as they are not
relavant to anything happening here but you DID bring up the weather here in
the states, so I thought I'd comment myself.

Good Day and Please, Don't Neglect Your Practice Counsellor,


JJ



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017