So here we go with the next one.: 6 to 12 April 2008, 03:55. Want to
bet them damned Yanks already started on it yesiddy?

Still no 5M quakes since:
Update time = Sun Apr 6 2:18:04 UTC 2008

5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 Kuril Islands.

Looks like they are in for a bucketful for the next few days eh?
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/yesterday.html

4 + 6 is 10 right?

On Apr 6, 3:45 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
So here we go with the next one.: 6 to 12 April 2008, 03:55. Want to
bet them damned Yanks already started on it yesiddy?

Still no 5M quakes since:
Update time = Sun Apr 6 2:18:04 UTC 2008

5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 Kuril Islands.

Looks like they are in for a bucketful for the next few days eh?http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/yesterday.html

4 + 6 is 10 right?

Right then lesseee...
Would you believe I have forgotten what these were like:

Feb 7 03:44 Feb 14 03:34 Feb 21 03:31

Then there's these:
Dec 17 10:17
Nov 17 22:32
Oct 3 10:06

http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/phase/phase2001gmt.html

I may have forgotten but they are all available with comments, just
search this group for the respective times.

But let's have a guess; provided no storms occur, they will be the
same as for last week.
With snow.
Hmmm...

I should be in bed. But something is niggling at me.

Cyclones.
Get an old envelope with one of those cellophane windows in it. Draw a
circle on that and mark it with arrows.

The top one points to the wall on your left the middle points to the
floor and the bottom to the room next door. A cyclone.

Hold it up to the light and turn it around. The top one points to the
bookcase behind you. The middle one to the floor. The bottom one
points to the window and the middle to the ceiling. An anticyclone.

Within the constraints that I don't know the place from which the
waves induced in the planet emanate, one might imagine it has
something to do with earth's barycentre.

In which cased it is logical to assume that in the absence of an over-
reaction on one side of the planet, the harmonic will appear as a
cyclone on one side of it while it appears as an anticyclone on the
other.

Or not, as the case may be.

The thing is, how does it flash on and off? And why does it turn into
earthquakes one cycle and volcanoes another?
Man, this stuff blows my head away. The more you find out, the less
you know.

And the more you find out the less you know, the more you tend to
find. Or to put it another way: The more confidence you have, the more
you can predict. But the more you can predict the more you are likely
to get it all wrong.

So that the less confidence you have, the more you tend to learn and
then the more you learn... the.....

Hold it up to the light and tell me which direction this thing is
going!
Somebody... please...

5.0 2008/04/06 07:23 RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 KURIL ISLANDS

Been a long break.
I can't see anything I can identify as a cause or a result on these:

http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...0033&number=14
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...0032&number=14
http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensem...me=00&Type=pnm
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/analysis/947_50.gif

There is an extensive High on the Canadian model. It's the size of
Canada. I am so used to looking at Lows that I can't tell what this
means.
Besides snow in England that is.

On Apr 6, 1:46 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
5.0 2008/04/06 07:23 RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 KURIL ISLANDS

Been a long break.
I can't see anything I can identify as a cause or a result on these:

http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...sis/947_50.gif

There is an extensive High on the Canadian model. It's the size of
Canada. I am so used to looking at Lows that I can't tell what this
means.
Besides snow in England that is.

The high is elongating but also seems to be building, as is the one in
the E Pacific (US/Canadian side.) There hasn't been a quake of ot
greater than mag 5 in a while.

And that could indicate that the pressure systems need to leave the
mainland before there is an earthquake. Just floating the ideas of
course. I leave all the hard and fast rules to the likes of Aidan
Karley.

Whose successes have become the stuff of stuffing:
http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...gk&scorin g=d

On Apr 7, 5:05 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Apr 6, 1:46 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

5.0 2008/04/06 07:23 RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 KURIL ISLANDS

Been a long break.
I can't see anything I can identify as a cause or a result on these:

http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...DCODE=IDX0033&...

There is an extensive High on the Canadian model. It's the size of
Canada. I am so used to looking at Lows that I can't tell what this
means.
Besides snow in England that is.

The high is elongating but also seems to be building, as is the one in
the E Pacific (US/Canadian side.) There hasn't been a quake of ot
greater than mag 5 in a while.

And that could indicate that the pressure systems need to leave the
mainland before there is an earthquake. Just floating the ideas of course.

5.6 2008/04/07 22:54 -20.1 168.5 LOYALTY ISLANDS
5.0 2008/04/06 21:01 -28.7 -178.5 KERMADEC ISLANDS

Another one of these.
And still no major storm.

However earlier ... yesterday.. there was a forecast for frost in the
UK this morning. So there is something brewing. Pressures seem to have
topped up a bit for Lows while Highs, though still extensive, are no
longer full to bursting.

On Apr 5, 8:57*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I should be in bed. But something is niggling at me.

Cyclones.

Here's a little known tid bit of rareatee. What do you get when you
arrange a face to face
fame war with Hillary and Barac? A cyclone.

Get an old envelope with one of those cellophane windows in it. Draw a
circle on that and mark it with arrows.

The top one points to the wall on your left the middle points to the
floor and the bottom to the room next door. A cyclone.

Hold it up to the light and turn it around. The top one points to the
bookcase behind you. The middle one to the floor. The bottom one
points to the window and the middle to the ceiling. An anticyclone.

Within the constraints that I don't know the place from which the
waves induced in the planet emanate, one might imagine it has
something to do with earth's barycentre.

In which cased it is logical to assume that in the absence of an over-
reaction on one side of the planet, the harmonic will appear as a
cyclone on one side of it while it appears as an anticyclone on the
other.

Or not, as the case may be.

The thing is, how does it flash on and off? And why does it turn into
earthquakes one cycle and volcanoes another?
Man, this stuff blows my head away. The more you find out, the less
you know.

And the more you find out the less you know, the more you tend to
find. Or to put it another way: The more confidence you have, the more
you can predict. But the more you can predict the more you are likely
to get it all wrong.

So that the less confidence you have, the more you tend to learn and
then the more you learn... the.....

Hold it up to the light and tell me which direction this thing is
going!
Somebody... please...