alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old August 7th 08, 05:42 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,ca.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 10:13 Synergies.

That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it
at all as far as I can see.

I wonder what happened.

  #32   Report Post  
Old August 7th 08, 05:33 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default 10:13. The China Syndrome

On Aug 6, 9:03*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Aug 5, 12:46*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Aug 4, 12:44*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Aug 3, 10:03 pm, Timberwoof wrote:


In article
,
*Weatherlawyer wrote:
They do tend to monopolise long threads of hurled abuse which is
tiresome to say the least.


And you never ever hurl abuse at people.


There's a good boy.


See? That was merely condescending.


Yes and with such altitude, almost majestic.


And .. what? Not so much witty or panache as ..well..


Witty with panache?


Maybe not.
But it beats having a dog. I don't have to pick up his excrement.


3 days gone, 4 days to go, W. There have been 2, earthquakes of 6 and
6.3 over the last 24 hours, but earthquakes of that strength occur, on
average about 1 every 3 days, so they can't count as your "major"
ones, can they?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


4 days gone, nothing remotely major. 3 days to go.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Still waiting W. 5 days gone, 2 to go. Fingers crossed for you.
  #33   Report Post  
Old August 7th 08, 05:48 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,ca.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 10:13 Synergies.

On Aug 7, 5:42 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it
at all as far as I can see.

I wonder what happened.


Lots of small quakes in the Aleutians but no tornadoes. It has to be
volcanic.

Looks similar to a negative in the North Atlantic too. (Lots of cells
but high Lows and low Highs.)

http://www.cuckney.pwp.blueyonder.co...r/Dorridge.htm
  #34   Report Post  
Old August 7th 08, 10:02 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,ca.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 10:13 Synergies.

On Aug 7, 5:48 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 7, 5:42 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it
at all as far as I can see.


I wonder what happened.


Lots of small quakes in the Aleutians but no tornadoes. It has to be
volcanic.

Looks similar to a negative in the North Atlantic too. (Lots of cells
but high Lows and low Highs.)

http://www.cuckney.pwp.blueyonder.co...r/Dorridge.htm


And now it's all change, so something big must have transpired. If it
is the series of small quakes off the west of North America, then all
we think we know about seismoogy can go in the bin.

If it is acoustics, not plate techtones, the ideas and theories about
magnitude and the various other intensities, need rewriting.
  #35   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 01:50 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
Default The China Syndrome

On Aug 2, 12:50*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote:
Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted.

You little sweetie.


Ain't he though. The volcano
near those clusters is gonna
erupt soon.


  #36   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 03:45 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default The China Syndrome

On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
wrote:
On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote:
Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted.


You little sweetie.


Ain't he though. The volcano
near those clusters is gonna
erupt soon.


Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the
so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the
Baltic is a witness to that.

No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo-
phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come?

And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a
geiger counter.

Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the
supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth
and the music of the spheres.
  #37   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 04:15 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default The China Syndrome

On Aug 8, 3:45*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet

wrote:
On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote:
Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted.


You little sweetie.


Ain't he though. *The volcano
*near those clusters is gonna
erupt soon.


Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the
so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the
Baltic is a witness to that.

No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo-
phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come?

And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a
geiger counter.

Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the
supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth
and the music of the spheres.


Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major
earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever
stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never
mentioned that before?

6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck.
  #38   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 06:02 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default The China Syndrome

On Aug 8, 4:15 pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Aug 8, 3:45 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:







On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet


wrote:
On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote:
Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted.


You little sweetie.


Ain't he though. The volcano
near those clusters is gonna
erupt soon.


Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the
so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the
Baltic is a witness to that.


No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo-
phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come?


And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a
geiger counter.


Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the
supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth
and the music of the spheres.


Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major
earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever
stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never
mentioned that before?

6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck.


I hate to tell you this but you are only party to half this thread.

I'd look at the complete collection of posts were I you -and at the
other stuff I have been posting on this spell.

Not that I expect a great deal from you or your kind. You have an
innate need to use the only equiptment you have that works. The
electronic equivalent of your mouth.

Most people have a neat little valve at the back of their mouths to
disconnect their throats from their bellies when they are breathing.
You seem to have one that disconnects your brane.

I have no quarrel with you in breathing. Out breathing, maybe but
could you pause between intakes and allow the top of your body to
function the way it was designed.

Failing that, keep your big gob shut.
  #39   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 06:17 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default The China Syndrome

On Aug 8, 6:02*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 8, 4:15 pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Aug 8, 3:45 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet


wrote:
On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote:
Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted.


You little sweetie.


Ain't he though. *The volcano
*near those clusters is gonna
erupt soon.


Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the
so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the
Baltic is a witness to that.


No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo-
phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come?


And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a
geiger counter.


Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the
supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth
and the music of the spheres.


Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major
earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever
stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never
mentioned that before?


6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck.


I hate to tell you this but you are only party to half this thread.

I'd look at the complete collection of posts were I you -and at the
other stuff I have been posting on this spell.

Not that I expect a great deal from you or your kind. You have an
innate need to use the only equiptment you have that works. The
electronic equivalent of your mouth.

Most people have a neat little valve at the back of their mouths to
disconnect their throats from their bellies when they are breathing.
You seem to have one that disconnects your brane.

I have no quarrel with you in breathing. Out breathing, maybe but
could you pause between intakes and allow the top of your body to
function the way it was designed.

Failing that, keep your big gob shut.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


One day to go. No major earthquake. Typical abuse beginning.

  #40   Report Post  
Old August 8th 08, 09:32 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,ca.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 10:13 Synergies.

On Aug 7, 10:02 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

If it is acoustics, not plate techtones, the ideas and theories about
magnitude and the various other intensities, need rewriting.


And finally: Just before the swarm was remarkable off the North
American western coast this series of volcanic events was remarked:

New Activity/Unrest: | Anatahan, Mariana Islands (Central Pacific) |
Chikurachki, Paramushir Island | Cleveland, Chuginadak Island |
Llaima, Central Chile | Manam, Northeast of New Guinea (SW Pacific) |
Okmok, Fox Islands | Reventador, Ecuador | Sumbing, Central Java
(Indonesia)

http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080730

A lot is left to be described with the theory of acoustic channeling
that I propose but swarms of small quakes about volcanoes is easily
one of the most obvious. And it fits in with the work of Bernard
Chouet:

"The concept of long-period events was originally used by people at
the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory to describe an event that has
characteristics distinct from a so-called tectonic earthquake.

If you’re looking at a seismogram of a tectonic earthquake, its
spectrum is very broad. In contrast, a long-period event has a very,
very sharp spectrum, what we call a resonant spectrum.

If you compare seismic traces, it’s immediately apparent that the long-
period event looks like a ringing bell and the other looks like a mess
of all different frequencies piled up on each other.

That very, very narrow spectrum is the tell-tale sign of a resonator.
Think of a bell sound. An organ pipe. They’re all different types of
resonators in nature."

http://www.esi-topics.com/volcanoes/...ardChouet.html

In fact the "long-period events" can be taken as the required
definition of the sound of a particular storm -or the major part of
it, whose acoustic channeling is being read as earthquake data in such
things.

It gives us part of the chain of overlapping sound waves that can
become the so called magnitude 6, 7 and greater earthquakes.

All we need do now is quantify what power output these waves
represent. Collate the particular storms involved at the time and mash
them all together.

We will come up with a mixture of values of low intensity sounds from
distant storms and high intensity stuff from those nearer home.

And the only thing that I am sure about in all this is that the
frequencies will be related to the angular distances to the storms and
the so called epicentres.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
China's Carbon Con: The Greening Of China Is A Mirage Surfer sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 November 21st 11 05:11 AM
The China Syndrome Eric Gisin[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 4 February 3rd 10 11:05 PM
The China Syndrome Weatherlawyer uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 26 August 12th 08 07:41 AM
Barbourne syndrome Tudor Hughes uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 7 July 19th 06 11:05 PM
China Typhoon: Natural disaster affects almost 13 million -- Rananim the strongest typhoon hitting China since 1956 Psalm 110 sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 August 17th 04 07:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017