Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it
at all as far as I can see. I wonder what happened. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 9:03*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Aug 5, 12:46*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Aug 4, 12:44*am, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 3, 10:03 pm, Timberwoof wrote: In article , *Weatherlawyer wrote: They do tend to monopolise long threads of hurled abuse which is tiresome to say the least. And you never ever hurl abuse at people. There's a good boy. See? That was merely condescending. Yes and with such altitude, almost majestic. And .. what? Not so much witty or panache as ..well.. Witty with panache? Maybe not. But it beats having a dog. I don't have to pick up his excrement. 3 days gone, 4 days to go, W. There have been 2, earthquakes of 6 and 6.3 over the last 24 hours, but earthquakes of that strength occur, on average about 1 every 3 days, so they can't count as your "major" ones, can they?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 4 days gone, nothing remotely major. 3 days to go.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Still waiting W. 5 days gone, 2 to go. Fingers crossed for you. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 5:42 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it at all as far as I can see. I wonder what happened. Lots of small quakes in the Aleutians but no tornadoes. It has to be volcanic. Looks similar to a negative in the North Atlantic too. (Lots of cells but high Lows and low Highs.) http://www.cuckney.pwp.blueyonder.co...r/Dorridge.htm |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 5:48 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 7, 5:42 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: That storm in the Baltic just curled up and died. No reaction from it at all as far as I can see. I wonder what happened. Lots of small quakes in the Aleutians but no tornadoes. It has to be volcanic. Looks similar to a negative in the North Atlantic too. (Lots of cells but high Lows and low Highs.) http://www.cuckney.pwp.blueyonder.co...r/Dorridge.htm And now it's all change, so something big must have transpired. If it is the series of small quakes off the west of North America, then all we think we know about seismoogy can go in the bin. If it is acoustics, not plate techtones, the ideas and theories about magnitude and the various other intensities, need rewriting. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 12:50*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote: Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted. You little sweetie. Ain't he though. The volcano near those clusters is gonna erupt soon. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
wrote: On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote: Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted. You little sweetie. Ain't he though. The volcano near those clusters is gonna erupt soon. Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the Baltic is a witness to that. No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo- phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come? And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a geiger counter. Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth and the music of the spheres. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 3:45*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet wrote: On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote: Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted. You little sweetie. Ain't he though. *The volcano *near those clusters is gonna erupt soon. Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the Baltic is a witness to that. No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo- phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come? And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a geiger counter. Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth and the music of the spheres. Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never mentioned that before? 6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 4:15 pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Aug 8, 3:45 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet wrote: On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote: Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted. You little sweetie. Ain't he though. The volcano near those clusters is gonna erupt soon. Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the Baltic is a witness to that. No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo- phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come? And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a geiger counter. Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth and the music of the spheres. Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never mentioned that before? 6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck. I hate to tell you this but you are only party to half this thread. I'd look at the complete collection of posts were I you -and at the other stuff I have been posting on this spell. Not that I expect a great deal from you or your kind. You have an innate need to use the only equiptment you have that works. The electronic equivalent of your mouth. Most people have a neat little valve at the back of their mouths to disconnect their throats from their bellies when they are breathing. You seem to have one that disconnects your brane. I have no quarrel with you in breathing. Out breathing, maybe but could you pause between intakes and allow the top of your body to function the way it was designed. Failing that, keep your big gob shut. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 6:02*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Aug 8, 4:15 pm, Dawlish wrote: On Aug 8, 3:45 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 8, 1:50 am, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet wrote: On Aug 2, 12:50 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Aug 2, 6:42 pm, "ronaldbutton" wrote: Top posting removed for clarity and the extraneous material deleted. You little sweetie. Ain't he though. *The volcano *near those clusters is gonna erupt soon. Actually the so called eruption syndrome is a false premise, as is the so called magnitude system. The dissipation of the cyclone over the Baltic is a witness to that. No large magnitude quakes and nothing of a disasterous nature in geo- phenomenon reported anywhere earthwide. Not even a tornado. How come? And me experiencing leg cramps and with my left arm clicking like a geiger counter. Ergo the swarms are just as signficant as large mag quakes; ergo the supposition of intensity values is wrong. It is the song of the earth and the music of the spheres. Ah! So the explanation of why there has not (yet) been a major earthquake, is that there have been lots of little ones. Have you ever stopped to think how completely stupid that sounds, having never mentioned that before? 6 days gone. No major quake. 1 day to go. Good luck. I hate to tell you this but you are only party to half this thread. I'd look at the complete collection of posts were I you -and at the other stuff I have been posting on this spell. Not that I expect a great deal from you or your kind. You have an innate need to use the only equiptment you have that works. The electronic equivalent of your mouth. Most people have a neat little valve at the back of their mouths to disconnect their throats from their bellies when they are breathing. You seem to have one that disconnects your brane. I have no quarrel with you in breathing. Out breathing, maybe but could you pause between intakes and allow the top of your body to function the way it was designed. Failing that, keep your big gob shut.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One day to go. No major earthquake. Typical abuse beginning. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 10:02 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
If it is acoustics, not plate techtones, the ideas and theories about magnitude and the various other intensities, need rewriting. And finally: Just before the swarm was remarkable off the North American western coast this series of volcanic events was remarked: New Activity/Unrest: | Anatahan, Mariana Islands (Central Pacific) | Chikurachki, Paramushir Island | Cleveland, Chuginadak Island | Llaima, Central Chile | Manam, Northeast of New Guinea (SW Pacific) | Okmok, Fox Islands | Reventador, Ecuador | Sumbing, Central Java (Indonesia) http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080730 A lot is left to be described with the theory of acoustic channeling that I propose but swarms of small quakes about volcanoes is easily one of the most obvious. And it fits in with the work of Bernard Chouet: "The concept of long-period events was originally used by people at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory to describe an event that has characteristics distinct from a so-called tectonic earthquake. If you’re looking at a seismogram of a tectonic earthquake, its spectrum is very broad. In contrast, a long-period event has a very, very sharp spectrum, what we call a resonant spectrum. If you compare seismic traces, it’s immediately apparent that the long- period event looks like a ringing bell and the other looks like a mess of all different frequencies piled up on each other. That very, very narrow spectrum is the tell-tale sign of a resonator. Think of a bell sound. An organ pipe. They’re all different types of resonators in nature." http://www.esi-topics.com/volcanoes/...ardChouet.html In fact the "long-period events" can be taken as the required definition of the sound of a particular storm -or the major part of it, whose acoustic channeling is being read as earthquake data in such things. It gives us part of the chain of overlapping sound waves that can become the so called magnitude 6, 7 and greater earthquakes. All we need do now is quantify what power output these waves represent. Collate the particular storms involved at the time and mash them all together. We will come up with a mixture of values of low intensity sounds from distant storms and high intensity stuff from those nearer home. And the only thing that I am sure about in all this is that the frequencies will be related to the angular distances to the storms and the so called epicentres. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
China's Carbon Con: The Greening Of China Is A Mirage | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The China Syndrome | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The China Syndrome | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Barbourne syndrome | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
China Typhoon: Natural disaster affects almost 13 million -- Rananim the strongest typhoon hitting China since 1956 | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |