Menu

sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

McNeil on the constants for high magnitude earthquakes.

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

#1

Report Post

Old

August 17th 03, 06:43 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology

Michael McNeil Michael McNeil is offline

Michael McNeil is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003

Posts: 2,359

Default

McNeil on the constants for high magnitude earthquakes.

From: (Michael McNeil)
Newsgroups: sci.geo.earthquakes
Subject: McNeil on the constants for high magnitude earthquakes.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.93.34.12
Message-ID:

I think this is the nearest to a constant I have seen in any attempt
to derive a law for earth-quakes:

When a series of lunar phases have similar predictive qualities about
them, as in the recent run up to the good weather we are now enjoying
in the UK, the times of the phases will induce a large mag. 'quake at
a point or region no-one as yet is sufficiently au fait with these
ideas to predict the window of.

There is enough circumstantial evidence to show the method has
provided sufficiently large enough quakes with repeated aftershocks
for the generation of serious attention to the idea put forward here.

21st. JULY. (Oops! I lost this when cutting and pasting in the
original post to sci.geo.earthquakes. It should have read

Wet
weather.

29th. JULY At 06:53 the lunar phase continued to produce wet weather.

But on the 5th AUG. at 07:28, the lunar phase induced something half
way between wet weather and fine. This time of phase (half-past stormy
half-to sunny) might (until further study clarifies the mechanics) be
considered a neutral point in the system.

2003/08/04 SCOTIA SEA

Time Lat (S) Long (W) Mag

07:09 -60.47 -43.72 4.9

06:53 -60.68 -43.98 4.3

06:48 -60.31 -43.48 4.6

06:38 -60.62 -42.96 5.0

06:34 -60.59 -44.54 5.2

05:36 -60.62 -43.01 5.0

05:16 -60.56 -43.23 5.0

04:37 -60.55 -43.49 7.5

(I'd never heard of it either. Apparently it is the sea around the
Falklands and Patagonia.)

Not only do I claim that there are several previous examples recently
posted here (sci.geo.earthquakes) by my great self, there is every
mathematical reason to believe that the inverse is true:

When the run of phases is such that the weather in Britain is it's
usual changeable self, there will be many earthquakes world wide but
few of large magnitude. (Almost none over 6.6M.)

Having (as far as I know) no peers in this realm, I shall have to
settle for the rebukes that these groups engender. But what is that to
a man who has greatness written through him like a geographical
location in a stick of rock?

Reply With Quote

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hurricane Irene and TWO magnitude 5-6 earthquakes in EASTERN US!	Bjørn Sørheim	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	103	September 18th 11 03:16 AM
Hurricane Irene and TWO magnitude 5-6 earthquakes in EASTERN US!	Will Hand	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	1	August 30th 11 08:54 AM
Live from the Sands Las Vegas. Michael Mcneil and the weather Laywers	lawrence Jenkins	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	0	April 19th 06 07:46 AM
F.A.O Mr M McNeil	lawrence Jenkins	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	11	April 12th 06 08:47 PM
For Michael McNeil	Dave.C	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	8	December 30th 04 09:18 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:53 AM.

About Us

"It's about Weather"

Contact Us Weather Banter Home Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2017