Now you see it now you don't, then you see it:

2003/12/21 07:40:45 0.75S 20.60W 10.0 6.6 CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE

This appeared on the http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
page on Sunday, on Monday it disappeared, now it appears to appear.

I dare-say some of you may be aware that I pointed out (on numerous
occasions) that the forecasting of a deepish low in the region of
Northern Britain and(stroke)or (ahem!) Norway would indicate large
earthquakes or some similar activity elsewhere on the planet.

No doubt the mutton heads that frequent this site would like to advise
you otherwise. Let's see them do so.

Hit 'em where it hurts hard enough and often enough and who knows; even
the thickest of sheep may get a tingle in the tangle they use for nerve
ends:

2003/12/22 21:31:36 35.71N 121.07W 3.7 4.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:41:46 35.52N 121.25W 23.9 4.4 OFFSHORE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:41:09 35.59N 120.89W 0.0 4.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:06:14 35.69N 121.11W 6.5 4.1 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:01:32 35.54N 120.94W 0.0 4.0 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:53:30 35.58N 121.12W 5.0 4.6 OFFSHORE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:30:10 35.60N 120.98W 0.0 4.4 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:26:07 35.63N 121.02W 0.0 4.7 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:15:56 35.71N 121.10W 7.6 6.5 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

Over to you Mr Angry or you Mr Orifice.

Lots of love and "glee" (was that the word?) not that I am gloating of
course. Just sharing in the "glee." (I'm sure that was the word.)


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Michael McNeil wrote:
Now you see it now you don't, then you see it:

2003/12/21 07:40:45 0.75S 20.60W 10.0 6.6 CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE

This appeared on the http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
page on Sunday, on Monday it disappeared, now it appears to appear.

I dare-say some of you may be aware that I pointed out (on numerous
occasions) that the forecasting of a deepish low in the region of
Northern Britain and(stroke)or (ahem!) Norway would indicate large
earthquakes or some similar activity elsewhere on the planet.

No doubt the mutton heads that frequent this site would like to advise
you otherwise. Let's see them do so.

Hit 'em where it hurts hard enough and often enough and who knows;
even the thickest of sheep may get a tingle in the tangle they use
for nerve ends:

2003/12/22 21:31:36 35.71N 121.07W 3.7 4.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:41:46 35.52N 121.25W 23.9 4.4 OFFSHORE CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 20:41:09 35.59N 120.89W 0.0 4.3 CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 20:06:14 35.69N 121.11W 6.5 4.1 CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 20:01:32 35.54N 120.94W 0.0 4.0 CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 19:53:30 35.58N 121.12W 5.0 4.6 OFFSHORE
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 19:30:10 35.60N 120.98W 0.0 4.4
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 19:26:07 35.63N 121.02W 0.0 4.7
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 2003/12/22 19:15:56 35.71N 121.10W 7.6 6.5
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

Over to you Mr Angry or you Mr Orifice.

Lots of love and "glee" (was that the word?) not that I am gloating of
course. Just sharing in the "glee." (I'm sure that was the word.)

A North Atlantic winter storm and a moderate earthquake in California?
_Never_ would have guessed both might happen on the same planet in the
same week...

You are a god.

"Bob Harrington" wrote in message
news:wnXFb.630771$Tr4.1633275@attbi_s03
You are a god.
I can not in all humility deny the fact without also denying that I am
indeed made in the image of no less than the progenitor of gods.
However your praise followed a measure of great ignorance; to whit:
A North Atlantic winter storm and a moderate earthquake in California?
_Never_ would have guessed both might happen on the same planet in the
same week...
Lamentably, the case is in fact what I have been at very great pains to
publish on this very site.






--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael McNeil" wrote in message
news:295bef560f8e99019c81f736a2044ad3.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...
Now you see it now you don't, then you see it:

2003/12/21 07:40:45 0.75S 20.60W 10.0 6.6 CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE

This appeared on the http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
page on Sunday, on Monday it disappeared, now it appears to appear.

I dare-say some of you may be aware that I pointed out (on numerous
occasions) that the forecasting of a deepish low in the region of
Northern Britain and(stroke)or (ahem!) Norway would indicate large
earthquakes or some similar activity elsewhere on the planet.

No doubt the mutton heads that frequent this site would like to advise
you otherwise. Let's see them do so.

Hit 'em where it hurts hard enough and often enough and who knows; even
the thickest of sheep may get a tingle in the tangle they use for nerve
ends:

2003/12/22 21:31:36 35.71N 121.07W 3.7 4.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:41:46 35.52N 121.25W 23.9 4.4 OFFSHORE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:41:09 35.59N 120.89W 0.0 4.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:06:14 35.69N 121.11W 6.5 4.1 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 20:01:32 35.54N 120.94W 0.0 4.0 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:53:30 35.58N 121.12W 5.0 4.6 OFFSHORE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:30:10 35.60N 120.98W 0.0 4.4 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:26:07 35.63N 121.02W 0.0 4.7 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2003/12/22 19:15:56 35.71N 121.10W 7.6 6.5 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

Over to you

The year isn't over. give it time. It will work its way south.
Mr Angry

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:41:11 +0000 (UTC), in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Michael
McNeil" wrote:

Now you see it now you don't, then you see it:

2003/12/21 07:40:45 0.75S 20.60W 10.0 6.6 CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE

This appeared on the http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
page on Sunday, on Monday it disappeared, now it appears to appear.

I dare-say some of you may be aware that I pointed out (on numerous
occasions) that the forecasting of a deepish low in the region of
Northern Britain and(stroke)or (ahem!) Norway would indicate large
earthquakes or some similar activity elsewhere on the planet.

Apophenia. and if you can't see that. some sort of weekly occurrence
triggers all events.

Too many other event fall outside you non-speific windows.
and the windows are large enough that any event could happen.

IIRC there are about 160-170 6.5 events per year. One could pick any 3 day
windows and have a decent chance of predicted an 6.5 event someplace in
world. Take a 6 day window and it will almost a sure thing.

IF I was to predict a 6.5 event within 6 months of a lunar eclipse, I would
be almost 100% chances of being correct.



--
Aktohdi

"Bob Officer" wrote in message


Apophenia. and if you can't see that. some sort of weekly occurrence
triggers all events.

Too many other event fall outside you non-speific windows.
and the windows are large enough that any event could happen.

IIRC there are about 160-170 6.5 events per year. One could pick any 3 day
windows and have a decent chance of predicted an 6.5 event someplace in
world. Take a 6 day window and it will almost a sure thing.

IF I was to predict a 6.5 event within 6 months of a lunar eclipse, I would
be almost 100% chances of being correct.


Apogee occurs every 27 or so days with an unexplained bias toward the
syzygies. But if you mean the term as a reference to my lunacy and that
I am advocating a return to the beliefs of the past...

I am looking at the weatherlore of the past and I am looking at cross
references to physics and such references in the bible. If I was
familiar with any of the other so called sacred texts I might attempt to
search them for any possible unnoticed or overlooked insights.

Perigee occurs every 27 days or so too; giving an occurrence of one or
the other of every 13/14 days. To be honest, although I am preparing a
late Victorian book for publication online that purports to show the
method used by one "thaumaturge" (who had some local fame in his day)
that does indicate one of the variables he used was the time of the
apside compared to the time of syzygy, my methods have not been based on
what the author states.

My method so far is merely the comparison of the times of the phases.
And from the said times I have not yet been able to afford a prophecy
that equates the run concerned in this thread (which is not due to end
until the 30th of December) with either weather (for the UK) or
earthquakes (anywhere else on the planet) with anything like the
certainty I would like.

In short, as stated elsewhere in this thread, I do not have enough
familiarity with the effects of the number of minutes before and after
the hours of these phases:

30 NOV. 17:16. 8 DEC. 20:37. 16 DEC. 17:42. 23 DEC. 09:43.

They do produce, ridges cols and troughs. And the more widely accepted
methods of forecasting weather is capable of picking up -in plenty of
time- the likely positions of fronts with 3 or 4 days fairly accurate
prescience.

Fortunately it is possible to forecast from these chaotic preparations
that a quake is due.

One day someone using such a method will be able to say where, when and
what strength such a quake will be.

I imagine that the size shape and rate of travel of the front as well as
the angle at which it lies on the weathwer charts, will be the method or
one of the methods used.

As far as "windows" are concerned:

As it happens the present phase is producing similar weather here to
that which the last phase produced, though (of course) there were some
differences (it is a little less cold since yesterday evening.) This
present spell will be consecutive to the previous one as well as to
the next one on the 30th. So my "Window" is 3 weeks long and more.

However I am not looking for quakes in the range of between 4 and 7 M.

I am hoping to define that quakes of 7-up will occur when this sort of
consecutive run takes place. In the meantime the likely arrival of
quakes in the region of 4-up can be forecast from "occluded fronts" that
are due to the arrival at the north west coast of the Atlantic from the
north east coast of said ocean.

If you find that this essay is a little too much for you to grasp all at
once, here is a nice little mantra to rehearse for the next few days:

Four emms good, 7 emms baaaaaaad.
Four emms good, 7 emms baaaaaad.
Four emms good, 7 emms baaaaad.
Four emms good, 7 emms baaaad.
Four emms good, 7 emms baaad.
Four emms good, 7 emms baad.
Four emms good, 7 emms bad.



(Bloody mutton heads!)


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael McNeil" wrote in message
news:67801da5794c483c905ee4694fbe35e6.45219@mygate .mailgate.org

In short, as stated elsewhere in this thread, I do not have enough
familiarity with the effects of the number of minutes before and after
the hours of these phases:

30 NOV. 17:16. 8 DEC. 20:37. 16 DEC. 17:42. 23 DEC. 09:43.

They do produce, ridges cols and troughs. And the more widely accepted
methods of forecasting weather is capable of picking up -in plenty of
time- the likely positions of fronts with 3 or 4 days fairly accurate
prescience.

Fortunately it is possible to forecast from these chaotic preparations
that a quake is due.

You might care to compare the maps on this page:
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/tkfaxbraar.htm

As you can see the Low that is sending out occluded fronts from Iceland
to Norway is still very much with us. I have an idea that this state of
affairs is to continue at least until around the 30th.

I am not saying that modern methods are useless but how much more use
would they be if they were utilized along side the good old fashioned
ways?

Chaos theory has much to commend it. The uninitiated may not realise
though, that the runs are moderated by the people in charge. A great
deal of the input is from experience not just mathematical data.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael McNeil" wrote in message
news:f9c7734c0138b9a5d21b44e7aaab0914.45219@mygate .mailgate.org

"Bob Harrington" wrote in message
news:wnXFb.630771$Tr4.1633275@attbi_s03

A North Atlantic winter storm and a moderate earthquake in California?
_Never_ would have guessed both might happen on the same planet in the
same week...

Lamentably, the case is in fact what I have been at very great pains to
publish on this very site.
Which begs the question:
What happened on the 10th?

2003/12/10 04:38:11.4 23.034N. 121.330E. 6.8M. TAIWAN.

To be honest the weather chart is not particularly outstanding in
respect of this date. It is however totally different from the charts of
the day before and the day after. Not that that means much to me at the
moment.

I'll have to keep that one in the "In" tray as pending further
elucidation. (Mind you the recent ones have both been about 60 degrees
from Icelandic waters. Perhaps I aught to look up a weather chart for
some equally interesting region 60 degrees from Taiwan. Anyone got a
link to a weather chart of the Tasman Sea?)
(Oh God; Please; Not Mr Angry I beg You!)


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:cfd75bd4c9059a3c5f2c1e69c6ee35f9.45219@mygate .mailgate.org

Anyone got a link to a weather chart of the Tasman Sea?)

I just found one:
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/nmocmthloop.pl

I was having an hell of a time trying to follow it. It seemed the
opposite to what you would expect of a weather chart to show. Highs on
the southern ocean just out of sight and lows on the land all the time.

Then it dawned on me that it is Australia therefore summer.

The other likely spots are the Bering and the Arabian Seas. Maybe the
Gulf of Alaska. It should be easy to find archived maps of these. (I
hope.)




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:cfd75bd4c9059a3c5f2c1e69c6ee35f9.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...
"Michael McNeil" wrote in message
news:f9c7734c0138b9a5d21b44e7aaab0914.45219@mygate .mailgate.org

"Bob Harrington" wrote in message
news:wnXFb.630771$Tr4.1633275@attbi_s03

A North Atlantic winter storm and a moderate earthquake in California?
_Never_ would have guessed both might happen on the same planet in the
same week...

Lamentably, the case is in fact what I have been at very great pains to
publish on this very site.
Which begs the question:
What happened on the 10th?

2003/12/10 04:38:11.4 23.034N. 121.330E. 6.8M. TAIWAN.

To be honest the weather chart is not particularly outstanding in
respect of this date. It is however totally different from the charts of
the day before and the day after. Not that that means much to me at the
moment.

I'll have to keep that one in the "In" tray as pending further
elucidation. (Mind you the recent ones have both been about 60 degrees
from Icelandic waters. Perhaps I aught to look up a weather chart for
some equally interesting region 60 degrees from Taiwan. Anyone got a
link to a weather chart of the Tasman Sea?)
(Oh God; Please; Not Mr Angry I beg You!)


--
You should find what you want somewhere in
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/sat_products.html.
Ralph Nesbitt
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG