Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 03:53:02 GMT, Joseph Bartlo
wrote: JATO Well there is an old saying you get what you pay for. If someone in the private sector can produce data that are so much better than the free service the government provides, then the knowledgable people who need these accurate forecasts would be able to tell the difference by comparison. I believe a good product sells itself. I agree that is true to some extent, but for example suppose someone says he likes Osama Bin Laden and makes the most accurate forecasts. Do you really think he'll be hired by many people in our country? Suppose a person makes crummy forecasts and has a name like AccuWeather behind him or the endorsement of many of his peers, is friends with people high on the proverbial meteorological totem pole. I've been in the science long enough to realize that it is to some extent not what you know but who you know - sort of like a network of a bunch of people of like mind patting each other on the back and leading themselves into wherever. I've been around long enough to know you do your homework and choose your vendors based on who provides the best product. If you choose someone as a vendor just because of popularity verses the quality of their product, then you deserve what you get. I like choices. If I have a need for a high end product and the Gov product can't product that, then I would go with the vendor that could. Pretty simple and straight forward. It's not rocket science. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:06:50 -0500,
David Salmon , in wrote: + James, it so hard to tell what you are rambling about, but let me be + perfectly clear for you and anybody else; That's perfectly clear. Let me be equally clear: why should I pay taxes to provide you data for *free*, then turn around and have to pay *you* for your value-added products? When you start paying for data - and I mean paying for the actual data, and not the delivery thereof - then I might start thinking it's all equal. James -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
National Weather Service - Online School for Weather | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
National Weather Service? | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
The National Weather Service and Aviation: Working Together Since the First Flight | Latest News | |||
Comment on Strategic Plan for NOAA's National Weather Service | Latest News | |||
NOAA's National Weather Service Hosts Severe Weather and Wildfire Awareness Week In Pacific Northwest | Latest News |