Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
has been very bad this year. I live in Madison, WI (US) BTW.
Starting on about sept 3/4 another huge plume of dust & **** could be seen blowing of the east coast of Africa between about 10-30 north. During the course of the next week it has been slowly wafting east towards the us, and appears to have reached us. Thick tendrils of smoke from fires in Montana (?) were also noted a few days ago. Not certain what's going on in Africa. Been some terrible plumes of dust and pollution blowing off Africa this year. For weeks (months really) large parts of south America have been burning, at about 10 south (Brazil and company). Likely more unsustainable slashing and burning to feed an increasingly bloated H. Sapiens population. SE Asia, China, Malyasia have been under an incredible pall this Summer. Combination of forest fires and pollution. It looks very bad judging from satellite imagery. Parts of Mexico have been very bad too. Here in the US, in the wake of hurricane Katrina, emissions standards have been lowered for gas. Already the global production of 'light sweet' oil has peaked. Most of the remaining crude is 'heavy' This stuff has more sulpher, heavy metals, and other impurities which need to be refined out. So now we can now look forward to more sulpher dioxide hazes. I fear that as we hit the hydrocarbon dregs and the global population continues to swell air quality will keep getting worse. More coal being burned, gas with more crud in it, more people burning wood to stay warm, especially in the US where the cost of nat. gas is skyrocketing. If you google 'global dimming' you'll see that, especially in the northern hemisphere, there's been a measurable decrease in the intensity of sunlight reaching the ground, especially since the 1950s - up to 20-30%. I imagine this can't be helping us amatuer astronomers as far as the clarity and transparency of the sky. Basically just pollution. It seems to me that, overall, the number of good clear days has been declining in my neck of the woods. And the clear days that do come aren't as clear as they used to be. Lately I've been feeling the need to retreat to the southern hemisphere. Perhaps the sky still occasionally looks blue there. -Eric B |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Mckenna wrote:
Unless you think we don't live in a democracy (U.S. readers take note) It is a popular misconception that the U.S. government is a democracy. It isn't, nor was it intended to be by the founding fathers. -- St. John |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sahara desert plumes have been coming at regular intervals since
history began. I guess this is the next left-wing rant -- "global dust." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
democracy ends on the day after the elections.
|
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, we could see the Sahara Dust plumes in Hawaii both in atmospheric
optical transparency and IIRC the Mauna Loa CN count (condensation nuclei) All deserts have plumes and so does every thing else from sea salt to industrial emissions. Of concern is the increased loading of these systems, their interaction, and global change accelerating these processes. Not so much as a left wing rant but the accumulation of data and the effort to understand what it means. If only one wing flaps we go in circles and get no where. Not to say that I am always balanced dan Dah_Rainbow_Mob wrote: Sahara desert plumes have been coming at regular intervals since history began. I guess this is the next left-wing rant -- "global dust." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dah_Rainbow_Mob wrote: Sahara desert plumes have been coming at regular intervals since history began. I guess this is the next left-wing rant -- "global dust." Yes, and the sahara plumes have been unusually bad and extensive this year. I've been keeping an eye on global satellite imagery for about a decade, and there's nothing subtle about the haze and smoke this year. It's been bad. Perhaps because there are now more people than ever before packed onto this globe, burning more stuff than ever before? nah.... Not to mention the large amounts of marginal land now being farmed, like sub-saharan regions, or the burning the Amazon river basin (land that has no business being farmed in the first place) - these all contribute to dust and plumes. Using the term 'left-wing' - like 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'conservative' or 'nazi' in an argument almost guarantees you've lost it as you haven't said ****. -Eric B |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Camel races maybe. Liberal camels.
|
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Mckenna wrote: You know, it's funny that you should mention this. When I fly from here to there I take the opportunity to look at the atmosphere in cross section. Yes, and it seems that what it is, is what is not what is was, say in the 70's. (blueness that is) (...) So I ask what are you going to do about it ? Not you Eric B, as you wrote about it, but the rest (saa dom)? shrugs Well I just had to bitch. I doubt most people notice or care. Interesing that Mauna Loa - normally a pristine environment - has noted the increased CN count. Not that I need them to tell me this. You wouldn't happen to have a link on that? Something to feed the pedants with. As to what can be done - unfortunately nothing. Things will take their course and likely continue get worse, at least short term. Get used to it or move. It's just that, as you noted, it's now global in scope and hard to escape from ![]() -Eric B (where the sky has been a featureless white for days) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have a link for the CN data
as it was mentioned to be over a beer in the 80s during a TGIF at the Hawaiian Institute for Geophysics by a atmospheric chem person that I built a CN counter for. Now that I think of it as far as I know, which isn't much about this, the Sahara plume can be detected in south Florida and so Hawaii might be a bit of a stretch. My guess is that it is the Gobi plume that Hawaii sees. Dan boo wrote: Dan Mckenna wrote: You know, it's funny that you should mention this. When I fly from here to there I take the opportunity to look at the atmosphere in cross section. Yes, and it seems that what it is, is what is not what is was, say in the 70's. (blueness that is) (...) So I ask what are you going to do about it ? Not you Eric B, as you wrote about it, but the rest (saa dom)? shrugs Well I just had to bitch. I doubt most people notice or care. Interesing that Mauna Loa - normally a pristine environment - has noted the increased CN count. Not that I need them to tell me this. You wouldn't happen to have a link on that? Something to feed the pedants with. As to what can be done - unfortunately nothing. Things will take their course and likely continue get worse, at least short term. Get used to it or move. It's just that, as you noted, it's now global in scope and hard to escape from ![]() -Eric B (where the sky has been a featureless white for days) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Haze, what Haze? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Mist/fog/haze/smoke haze | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Cause of haze/smoke in US Gulf? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Sat Pic of the Day-Smoke Trails and Cloud Streets over SE England | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Stability and smoke behaviour | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |