Chicken Little clowns are STUCK ON STUPID! (WAS: Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150 mph: Cat 4: to go to cat 5 soon.
 

"dan" wrote:
Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

No, it's not an "ordinary year", but it's a typical year among those
years that include a busier hurricane season.

Tell you what, sport, ever heard of El Nino? That is an example of...
1) a natural phenomenon...
2) that is made worse by Global Warming.
Climate scientists agree on both those points.

It just so happens that El Nino years feature a remarkable LACK of
hurricanes. Give it some thought. Blaming GW for hurricanes is worse
than stupid.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?

Not according to Hurricane scientists. Do you actually think that if
man had used, say, only 1/10 of the fossil fuel we have actually used,
that the climate wouild be any different?
--
): "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think" :(
(: Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net :)

Deep Throat "Well Done" Slurps Gobs of Oil Pipeline Petroleum Jelly, spills on Blue Dress
 

Well Done wrote:
"dan" wrote:
Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

No, it's not an "ordinary year", but it's a typical year among those
years that include a busier hurricane season.

Name any other year in history that had 3 catagory 5 hurricanes.

Name the one other year that had 21 cyclones, but no cat 5s?
1933 : TS=11, C1=2, C2=3, C3=3, C4=2

Name the only other year that had 12 hurricanes?
1969 : TS=6, C1=5, C2=2, C3=4, C5=1

Name the ONLY year that had 12 Hurricanes AND 21 cyclones AND 2 cat 5
canes?
2005 : TS=9, C1=6, C3=1, C4=2, C5=3

Name the ONLY decade in record-keeping history with 5 Cat 5s?
1996 : TS=4, C1=3, C3=4, C4=2
1997 : TS=5, C1=1, C3=1
1998 : TS=4, C1=3, C2=4, C3=1, C4=1, C5=1
1999 : TS=4, C2=3, C4=5
2000 : TS=7, C1=5, C3=1, C4=2
2001 : TS=6, C1=5, C3=2, C4=2
2002 : TS=8, C1=1, C2=1, C3=1, C4=1
2003 : TS=9, C1=3, C2=1, C3=2, C5=1
2004 : TS=5, C1=1, C2=1, C3=2, C4=3, C5=1
2005 : TS=9, C1=6, C3=1, C4=2, C5=3

Winter 1997-1998 was an El Nino year of particular severity: what did
the weather do the summer of 98?
1998 : TS=4, C1=3, C2=4, C3=1, C4=1, C5=1

Winter 2002-2003 was a severe El Nino: what did the weather do the
summer of 03?
2003 : TS=9, C1=3, C2=1, C3=2, C5=1

Tell you what, sport, ever heard of El Nino? That is an example of...
1) a natural phenomenon...
2) that is made worse by Global Warming.
Climate scientists agree on both those points.

It just so happens that El Nino years feature a remarkable LACK of
hurricanes. Give it some thought. Blaming GW for hurricanes is worse
than stupid.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?

Not according to Hurricane scientists. Do you actually think that if
man had used, say, only 1/10 of the fossil fuel we have actually used,
that the climate wouild be any different?

It was different when Man used only 1/10th the fossil fuels: That is
why NOW is worse.
PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE 1996-2005 to averages 1851-1995
144% MORE Tropical Storms, 1996-2005
47% MORE Hurricanes Category 1, 1996-2005
14% LESS Hurricanes Category 2, 1996-2005
52% MORE MAJOR Hurricanes Category 3, 1996-2005
90% MORE MAJOR Hurricanes Category 4, 1996-2005
257% MORE MAJOR Hurricanes Category 5, 1996-2005
(Upto 2005 Hurricane Wilma C5)

WE HAVE A NEW RECORD: Wilma 175 mph, MINIMUM PRESSURE OF 892 MB
 

It's really big.. http://tinyurl.com/nh2z -- Sat. image

WE HAVE A NEW RECORD: Wilma 175 mph, MINIMUM PRESSURE OF 892 MB
 

The U.S. has time to deflect or suppress Hurricane Wilma. The question
is will they do it and if not, why not?

http://foxfiretechnology.com/

WE HAVE A NEW RECORD: Wilma 175 mph, MINIMUM PRESSURE OF 892 MB
 

Hurricane Guy wrote:
The U.S. has time to deflect or suppress Hurricane Wilma. The question
is will they do it and if not, why not?

If we don't even have the technology to defect @ssholes like you, we
surely are powerless against even the small ill winds that blowhard.