sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 12:48 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

Steve Bloom wrote:
"dan" wrote in message
...

Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?



I wonder how many cat 4 or 5 hurricanes there have been this late in the
season in prior years.



That's a difficult question to answer for times
before frequent recon -- Wilma, for example,
would not likely be recorded as a cat 4 or 5 based
on ship reports alone.

What a beautiful storm from satellite!!

Scott

  #12   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 01:55 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2005
Posts: 11
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

dan wrote:
Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.


Do observe:

Wilma's rapid intensification took place over waters of
near normal sea surface temperatures:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/products/...sstanomaly.gif
  #13   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 02:07 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

Atheist 4 Bush (reformed) wrote:

Do observe:

Wilma's rapid intensification took place over waters of
near normal sea surface temperatures:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/products/...sstanomaly.gif


It's hard to tell with such a poor resolution mapping,
but it looks to me like SSTs are almost 2C above normal
where Wilma bombed out.

I will also point out that SSTs are only part of the
story. If the very warm water is much deeper than
normal, then heat content anomalies will be huge. [Of
course there is no way to tell that ]


Scott
  #14   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 02:37 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150 mph: Cat 4: to go to cat 5 soon.


Scott wrote:
Atheist 4 Bush (reformed) wrote:

Do observe:

Wilma's rapid intensification took place over waters of
near normal sea surface temperatures:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/products/...sstanomaly.gif


It's hard to tell with such a poor resolution mapping,
but it looks to me like SSTs are almost 2C above normal
where Wilma bombed out.

I will also point out that SSTs are only part of the
story. If the very warm water is much deeper than
normal, then heat content anomalies will be huge. [Of
course there is no way to tell that ]


Thermal Mass. There is a way to tell, you measure the water
temperatures. We used to put little digital temperature data loggers in
steel pipes with caps, and hang them down there for weeks and months.

  #15   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 02:39 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

wrote:
Scott wrote:

Atheist 4 Bush (reformed) wrote:


Do observe:

Wilma's rapid intensification took place over waters of
near normal sea surface temperatures:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/products/...sstanomaly.gif


It's hard to tell with such a poor resolution mapping,
but it looks to me like SSTs are almost 2C above normal
where Wilma bombed out.

I will also point out that SSTs are only part of the
story. If the very warm water is much deeper than
normal, then heat content anomalies will be huge. [Of
course there is no way to tell that ]



Thermal Mass. There is a way to tell, you measure the water
temperatures. We used to put little digital temperature data loggers in
steel pipes with caps, and hang them down there for weeks and months.


There is very little historical data depth of, say,
the 28 C isotherm in the NW Caribbean. Yes, there is a way
to tell, but was it done in the past? Only very rarely --
certainly not often enough to develop a reliable
climatology.


Scott


  #16   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 03:04 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150 mph: Cat 4: to go to cat 5 soon.

If the past is the last 15 years, then yes.

http://www.globalcoral.org/monitorin...ting_sea_s.htm

Our concerns were a little different back then, but the result was
still the same.

  #17   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 03:17 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
owl owl is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 103
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150 mph: Cat 4: to go to cat 5 soon.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:19:25 GMT, "Steve Bloom"
wrote:


"dan" wrote in message
...
Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?


I wonder how many cat 4 or 5 hurricanes there have been this late in the
season in prior years.

Two - Mitch (98), and Hattie (61)

http://www.weathermatrix.net/tropical/cat5storms.htm

Interestingly, only 6 of the CAT 5's were in hot August, and 18 were
in September. This year it's one per month, and each one selects
something from the record-book.

Even if Landsea's Lost n Found project finds a few corrections from
the past, he's gonna have to hum a pretty good tune to say the
intensity increases predicted by the AGW models weren't showing up,
eh?
  #18   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 03:55 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

owl wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:19:25 GMT, "Steve Bloom"
wrote:


"dan" wrote in message
...

Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?


I wonder how many cat 4 or 5 hurricanes there have been this late in the
season in prior years.


Two - Mitch (98), and Hattie (61)

http://www.weathermatrix.net/tropical/cat5storms.htm

Interestingly, only 6 of the CAT 5's were in hot August, and 18 were
in September.


Why is that at all interesting? September is the peak hurricane
month -- why shouldn't you expect more strong hurricanes in Sept?
You seem to be implying that SSTs are remarkably warmer in August
than in September. Are you? On what basis?

Scott
  #19   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 04:27 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
owl owl is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 103
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150 mph: Cat 4: to go to cat 5 soon.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:55:27 -0500, Scott
wrote:

owl wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:19:25 GMT, "Steve Bloom"
wrote:


"dan" wrote in message
...

Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?


I wonder how many cat 4 or 5 hurricanes there have been this late in the
season in prior years.


Two - Mitch (98), and Hattie (61)

http://www.weathermatrix.net/tropical/cat5storms.htm

Interestingly, only 6 of the CAT 5's were in hot August, and 18 were
in September.


Why is that at all interesting? September is the peak hurricane
month -- why shouldn't you expect more strong hurricanes in Sept?
You seem to be implying that SSTs are remarkably warmer in August
than in September. Are you? On what basis?

Scott


Feel better?
  #20   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 04:32 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
Default Hurricane WILMA: Airforce plane measures sustained winds of 150

owl wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:55:27 -0500, Scott
wrote:


owl wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:19:25 GMT, "Steve Bloom"
wrote:



"dan" wrote in message
...


Just an ordinary year. Couldn't be global warming. Nah.

Holy ****, is this going to start happening every year, or even get worse?


I wonder how many cat 4 or 5 hurricanes there have been this late in the
season in prior years.


Two - Mitch (98), and Hattie (61)

http://www.weathermatrix.net/tropical/cat5storms.htm

Interestingly, only 6 of the CAT 5's were in hot August, and 18 were
in September.


Why is that at all interesting? September is the peak hurricane
month -- why shouldn't you expect more strong hurricanes in Sept?
You seem to be implying that SSTs are remarkably warmer in August
than in September. Are you? On what basis?

Scott



Feel better?


Actually, no change. Gonna answer the question?

btw, re-learned a word today: trochoidal. Where's my
super-spirograph? What a great satellite loop of Wilma.

scott


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
150 mph Super-Typhoon EWINIAR to Japan -- High Cat 4 Strength Prosecute Koch Brothers for Global Warming FLOOD Damages sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 11 July 9th 06 10:28 PM
San Salvador in the Eye of Frances... Sustained Winds of 114 MPH Reported NewsBot Latest News 0 March 24th 06 08:06 PM
Ivan is a Cat 5 Hurricane again ~ 165 MPH Winds Gilbert1988 alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) 1 September 12th 04 03:47 AM
Ivan downgraded to Cat 4 ~ 150 MPH winds Gilbert1988 alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) 0 September 9th 04 09:03 PM
Ivan downgraded to Cat 4 ~ 150 MPH winds Gilbert1988 sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 September 9th 04 09:03 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017