Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
In message , Peter Jason writes Since there is a small increase in CO2 levels in recent times, why don't the forests of the world grow faster to compensate for this? For small increases in C02 levels, and everything else being equal, they do. But in the same way as increased dissolution in the ocean, this only reduces the rate of increase. If anthropogenic emissions were constant CO2 levels would equilibriate at a higher level. However, increased evaporation and transpiration may conspire to decrease photosynthesis, by placing the plants under physiological stress. For example, I read that, in the European drought of last summer plants were a net source of CO2, not a sink. And when plants drown in a flood they release all sorts of nasties too... Ya just can't win! Cheers, Phred. -- LID |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Increased UV levels | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Increased Atmospheric CO2 During the Middle Eocene | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Without high levels of CO2, we would ALL DIE | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Prehistoric CO2 levels & climate change | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
"Sharp Rise in CO2 Levels Recorded" | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |