|
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
Roger Coppock wrote: EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased I find it amusing that these "scientists" show a 1.3 million year proxy temperature graph and end the last 8th of the graph with a 135 year actual temperature reading. Ahhh, James Hanson.......what a nut! Oh and these "sciencetists" haven't taken the gloves off, they have just lost thier objectivity! Which makes them nothing better than.... lets say.... you! |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote: EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Abstract: Global surface temperature has increased |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
wrote: Roger Coppock wrote: EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased I find it amusing that these "scientists" show a 1.3 million year proxy temperature graph and end the last 8th of the graph with a 135 year actual temperature reading. "The paleoclimate SST, based on Mg content of foraminifera shells, provides accuracy to1°C (29). Thus we cannot be sure that we have precisely aligned the paleo and modern temperature scales. Accepting paleo and modern temperatures at face value implies a WEP 1870 SST in the middle of its Holocene range. Shifting the scale to align the 1870 SST with the lowest Holocene value raises the paleo curve by 0.5°C. Even in that case, the 2001-2005 WEP SST is at least as great as any Holocene proxy temperature at that location. Coarse temporal resolution of the Holocene data, 1,000 years, may mask brief warmer excursions, but cores with higher resolution (29) suggest that peak Holocene WEP SSTs were not more than 1°C warmer than in the late Holocene, before modern warming. It seems safe to assume that the SST will not decline this century, given continued increases of GHGs, so in a practical sense the WEP temperature is at or near its highest level in the Holocene. Fig. 5, including WEP data for the past 1.35 million years, shows that the current WEP SST is within 1°C of the warmest interglacials in that period." Perhaps you can take this opportunity to provide the expert peer review of this study. Remember, you don't have to replicate the data! [snip] Tracy P. Hamilton |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
oups.com... EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased "This evidence implies that we are getting close to dangerous levels of human-made pollution," Hansen said in a statement. "If further global warming reaches 2 or 3 degrees Celsius, we will likely see changes that make Earth a different planet than the one we know. The last time it was that warm was in the middle Pliocene, about 3 million years ago, when sea level was estimated to have been about 25 meters (80 feet) higher than today," Hansen said. So, if the planet wasn't getting warmer, would it be getting cooler? Wouldn't that also make it a "different planet than the one we know?" Or does Hansen believe that the climate would just stay the same forever, if we would just stop adding greenhouse gases? If so, has he not looked at his own charts? I think that's what bugs me the most about people like Hansen. If the global temperature was falling instead of rising, he would still be crying about how we were sliding into a new ice age, and the government was doing nothing to stop it. |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
El Guapo wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message oups.com... EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased "This evidence implies that we are getting close to dangerous levels of human-made pollution," Hansen said in a statement. "If further global warming reaches 2 or 3 degrees Celsius, we will likely see changes that make Earth a different planet than the one we know. The last time it was that warm was in the middle Pliocene, about 3 million years ago, when sea level was estimated to have been about 25 meters (80 feet) higher than today," Hansen said. So, if the planet wasn't getting warmer, would it be getting cooler? Wouldn't that also make it a "different planet than the one we know?" Or does Hansen believe that the climate would just stay the same forever, if we would just stop adding greenhouse gases? If so, has he not looked at his own charts? You are imagining an ice age that is no longer going to happen. Some of us like to stick with reality, the hydrocarbon combustion, the warming. I think that's what bugs me the most about people like Hansen. If the global temperature was falling instead of rising, he would still be crying about how we were sliding into a new ice age, and the government was doing nothing to stop it. The government and corporations have already stopped the ice age. That little reality thing, remember? Reality on Earth is like a powered rocket with no inertial control. Inertial control is clearly possible. Science is what makes inertial control possible. That's reality. So, no, are you still having problems with reality? http://cosmic.lifeform.org |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message ... El Guapo wrote: "Roger Coppock" wrote in message oups.com... EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased "This evidence implies that we are getting close to dangerous levels of human-made pollution," Hansen said in a statement. "If further global warming reaches 2 or 3 degrees Celsius, we will likely see changes that make Earth a different planet than the one we know. The last time it was that warm was in the middle Pliocene, about 3 million years ago, when sea level was estimated to have been about 25 meters (80 feet) higher than today," Hansen said. So, if the planet wasn't getting warmer, would it be getting cooler? Wouldn't that also make it a "different planet than the one we know?" Or does Hansen believe that the climate would just stay the same forever, if we would just stop adding greenhouse gases? If so, has he not looked at his own charts? You are imagining an ice age that is no longer going to happen. Some of us like to stick with reality, the hydrocarbon combustion, the warming. I think that's what bugs me the most about people like Hansen. If the global temperature was falling instead of rising, he would still be crying about how we were sliding into a new ice age, and the government was doing nothing to stop it. The government and corporations have already stopped the ice age. That little reality thing, remember? Reality on Earth is like a powered rocket with no inertial control. Inertial control is clearly possible. Science is what makes inertial control possible. That's reality. So, no, are you still having problems with reality? http://cosmic.lifeform.org Forget about global warming, it is time for the 10,000 year earth axis tilt, the one that previously turned the Sahara into a desert from a lush tropical rain forest. Just think, there were no greenhouse gasses from man then, perhaps a little methane, but not much else. Just think what lies around the next earth axis tilt? I guarantee it will make you forget all about global warming. What a wobbly planet we live on, , , , Cosmicbull****.com - where you go to obtain nothing of use, but will be inspired by pure crap meant to frighten you into sending a check to the nearest greenie organization. |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
SBC Yahoo wrote:
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message ... El Guapo wrote: "Roger Coppock" wrote in message oups.com... EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased "This evidence implies that we are getting close to dangerous levels of human-made pollution," Hansen said in a statement. "If further global warming reaches 2 or 3 degrees Celsius, we will likely see changes that make Earth a different planet than the one we know. The last time it was that warm was in the middle Pliocene, about 3 million years ago, when sea level was estimated to have been about 25 meters (80 feet) higher than today," Hansen said. So, if the planet wasn't getting warmer, would it be getting cooler? Wouldn't that also make it a "different planet than the one we know?" Or does Hansen believe that the climate would just stay the same forever, if we would just stop adding greenhouse gases? If so, has he not looked at his own charts? You are imagining an ice age that is no longer going to happen. Some of us like to stick with reality, the hydrocarbon combustion, the warming. I think that's what bugs me the most about people like Hansen. If the global temperature was falling instead of rising, he would still be crying about how we were sliding into a new ice age, and the government was doing nothing to stop it. The government and corporations have already stopped the ice age. That little reality thing, remember? Reality on Earth is like a powered rocket with no inertial control. Inertial control is clearly possible. Science is what makes inertial control possible. That's reality. So, no, are you still having problems with reality? http://cosmic.lifeform.org Forget about global warming plonk |
EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!!
Tracy P. Hamilton wrote: wrote: Roger Coppock wrote: EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT 12,000-YEAR HIGH!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE AT HOLOCENE MAXIMUM!!!! EARTH'S TEMPERATURE WITHIN 1K OF 1,000,000-YEAR MAXIMUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strong El Nin~os to become permanent El Nin~o!!!!!!!!!!! AP article http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...5global001.cfm The actual article in PNAS currently free to the public. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0606291103v1 [Note the highly unusual inclusion of political references in this scientific paper. I haven't exhaustively surveyed the history of PNAS, but l doubt the the reviewers at PNAS would have allowed this before. Science has taken the gloves off!] Global surface temperature has increased I find it amusing that these "scientists" show a 1.3 million year proxy temperature graph and end the last 8th of the graph with a 135 year actual temperature reading. "The paleoclimate SST, based on Mg content of foraminifera shells, provides accuracy to1°C (29). Thus we cannot be sure that we have precisely aligned the paleo and modern temperature scales. Accepting paleo and modern temperatures at face value implies a WEP 1870 SST in the middle of its Holocene range. Shifting the scale to align the 1870 SST with the lowest Holocene value raises the paleo curve by 0.5°C. Even in that case, the 2001-2005 WEP SST is at least as great as any Holocene proxy temperature at that location. Coarse temporal resolution of the Holocene data, 1,000 years, may mask brief warmer excursions, but cores with higher resolution (29) suggest that peak Holocene WEP SSTs were not more than 1°C warmer than in the late Holocene, before modern warming. It seems safe to assume that the SST will not decline this century, given continued increases of GHGs, so in a practical sense the WEP temperature is at or near its highest level in the Holocene. Fig. 5, including WEP data for the past 1.35 million years, shows that the current WEP SST is within 1°C of the warmest interglacials in that period." Perhaps you can take this opportunity to provide the expert peer review of this study. Remember, you don't have to replicate the data! [snip] Tracy P. Hamilton Peer review that tripe? That would slide across my desk and into my garbage can.... Comparing proxy to actual temperatures is only something you would do Hamilton, along with that joke of a graph. Looks almost like Coppock made it. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk