|
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy
equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:15:10 GMT, Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global
Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html you mean it emitted a coherent stream of photons from a mix of CO2 and H2O by stimulated emmission? 2763 MT of TNT energy MEASURED? or just calculated? your next exercise is to calculate the background level of energy form the area normally existing. further, compare that to the "MTs of energy" that cover the globe every day. one of your other sock puppets came up with this "laser" baloney... do you have any idea what you're talking about? |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
beav wrote in
: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:15:10 GMT, Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html you mean it emitted a coherent stream of photons from a mix of CO2 and H2O by stimulated emmission? That's what the satellite photographed. IR in the 10.7 micron wavelength at intensities not normal, in an area of 70,000 square miles, which persisted for hours duration at peak and at unseen before levels over two days time. 2763 MT of TNT energy MEASURED? or just calculated? your next exercise is to calculate the background level of energy form the area normally existing. further, compare that to the "MTs of energy" that cover the globe every day. The measurements were performed by a fleet of satellites with data processed by the US Navy for navigational knowledge and security issues. The stimulated emissions were concurrent with precipitation of rain as a byproduct of the emission of IR energy -- with the decrease in energy, liquid water bonds were able to form. The measured rainfail is a reciprical of the emitted energy: know either one and you know the other automatically. The latent heat of fusion for change of state from vapor to liquid is known with great precision and has been known for centuries. one of your other sock puppets came up with this "laser" baloney... do you have any idea what you're talking about? Yes, natural formation of CO2 gas, H2O catalyst, amplification and stimulated emission of infrared light radiant energy. That's what the word "LASER" was invented to describe: L = Light, A = Amplification, S = Stimulated, E = Emission, R = Radiation. A normal CO2 gas laser is a tube filled with CO2, Nitrogen and Water Vapor, to which electricity is applied. The electrons energize the Nitrogen which emits photons, which are absorbed by the CO2 through H2O catalysis, and the CO2 then spontaneously forms an emission stream. The sidewalls contain the stream of photons and a full reflector on the back forces a one-way stream through a semi-reflective front. Exactly what was seen here. The thunderstorm activity provided the charges of lightening. The rainfall curtains provided a reflective sidewalls, the wet watery surface provided the impermeable rear reflector, the atmoshere donated the CO2, H2O vapor and Nitrogen gases, and Global Warming provided the base system energy. The thing was PHOTOGRAPHED and measured up the yin-yang, you friggin' dunce. NOAA satellites provided the public, including you and me, the images, and the US Navy made their own archives as did I. Reality does not go away because you find it an inconvenient truth. Until somebody shows photographic evidence differently this stands as the largest IR emitter ever photographed on planet Earth. The emissions were at the top of the instrument calibrations and may have exceeded the instruments capability to record excess emissions.31 of the 50 States of the United States are smaller than this event in terms of Earth surface coverage. That big Ice Melt lake in the Arctic that people were recently talking about was only slightly over half the size of this CO2 LASER event, only 38,000 square miles versus 70,000 square miles. You are just another stupid republican who spends too much time thinking about getting into boys behinds. |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
beav wrote in
: On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:30:18 GMT, "Ray Lopez ion" wrote: beav wrote in m: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:15:10 GMT, Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html you mean it emitted a coherent stream of photons from a mix of CO2 and H2O by stimulated emmission? That's what the satellite photographed. IR in the 10.7 micron wavelength at intensities not normal, in an area of 70,000 square miles, which persisted for hours duration at peak and at unseen before levels over two days time. its not over 70000 km. the most intense areas are quite a bit smaller in area. 70,000 SQUARE MILES is larger than 70,000 km^2, and 70,000 MILES^2 is what can be measured from the photographic data. if it was coherent, the intensity would show as black or whatever burned out pixels look like. This is your shabby republican science education at work again. Did you go to Kansas Creationist Science Schools? Lasers can be mild as checkout scanners or intense enough that they melt through steel as cutting lasers. Your mistake is to think they only have one peak intensity parameter. At 25,000 miles in space, very few of the IR photons actually reach the sensors. Mostly they difuse. THe sensors are built rugged enough to capture natural levels of peak intensity, and nobody really knows how many test sensors they did burn out befoire they arrived at the threshhold level of instrument ruggedness appropriate for natural phenomena. The detectors have unused upper detection threshhold which rarely ever gets activated by natural events. In this case the unused portion was used because the intensity exceeded the photon emissions of even Hurricane Wilma, the strongest hurricane ever measured in the Atlantic Basin. You are just a knee-jerk opposer operating by compulsive reflex without thinking and processing data. You did go to Moonie Kansas "Intelligunt Desine" classes, didn't you? Admit it. the pictures of ioke were very interesting. i don't know what "emissions of the green area are not by obvious means" means... its the very hottest part of the hurricane. what's the big deal? There are "conventionl paradigms" which explain what the IR detectors "mean". The plain fact is the detectors detect -- that's all they do. If photons arrive physically at the location of the detector then they are detected, else not. It really is that simple. Interpretation of the IR photons being detected is applied paradigms, putting "meanng" to the image created. The wrong paradigm will apply the wrong "meaning" and deceive about the underlying physics in operation which generated those IR photons. The statement is a warning not to jump to conclusions by applying paradigms recklessly with disregard for the totality of the known facts. 2763 MT of TNT energy MEASURED? or just calculated? your next exercise is to calculate the background level of energy form the area normally existing. further, compare that to the "MTs of energy" that cover the globe every day. The measurements were performed by a fleet of satellites with data processed by the US Navy for navigational knowledge and security issues. The stimulated emissions were concurrent with precipitation of rain as a byproduct of the emission of IR energy -- with the decrease in energy, liquid water bonds were able to form. The measured rainfail is a reciprical of the emitted energy: know either one and you know the other automatically. The latent heat of fusion for change of state from vapor to liquid is known with great precision and has been known for centuries. one of your other sock puppets came up with this "laser" baloney... do you have any idea what you're talking about? Yes, natural formation of CO2 gas, H2O catalyst, amplification and stimulated emission of infrared light radiant energy. That's what the word "LASER" was invented to describe: L = Light, A = Amplification, S = Stimulated, E = Emission, R = Radiation. that's why i bought it up. no stimulated emission is occurring. It it is NOT stimulated, then provde an alternate explanation for what is photographed. It certainly is not a normal presence. This "abnormality" existed to be photographed because it's abnormal presense was stimulated into existence. Words actually do have meanings -- stimulated has a meaning, and I used it within the defined parameters of that meaning. You are simply denying photographic evidence and playingmutation games with words. You have no alternative decription of the causal factors producing a rare abnormality. A normal CO2 gas laser is a tube filled with CO2, Nitrogen and Water Vapor, to which electricity is applied. The electrons energize the Nitrogen which emits photons, which are absorbed by the CO2 through H2O catalysis, and the CO2 then spontaneously forms an emission stream. The sidewalls contain the stream of photons and a full reflector on the back forces a one-way stream through a semi-reflective front. Exactly what was seen here. ummmm. no. you need CO2, N2 and He in a reflective flow thru chamber, under a relative vacuum (10-100 torr) O2 will quench any population inversion. Not under the circumstances seen here. Laboratories have a difficulty of producing the "gigawatts" of power of natural lightening strokes, whereas tropical storms have no shortages of lightning available. What is your measurement of the "air pressure" in the passage zone of a gigawatt flow of electricity in a smal space of time? What do you think causes the "thunder" sound, if not the instantaneous creation of a violent displacement of air molecules my multi-millions of Ampreres of electrons flowing? The thunderstorm activity provided the charges of lightening. The rainfall curtains provided a reflective sidewalls, the wet watery surface provided the impermeable rear reflector, the atmoshere donated the CO2, H2O vapor and Nitrogen gases, and Global Warming provided the base system energy. what? its an engineering project at its most simple. forming in a hurricane? cmon. Kansas Creationist Scienticklish-Flavored Denialism again. "Hot Towers" is an established cyclone terminology associated with these radiant events. The terminology is nearly a decade old at this point. The elucidation has never been achieved by applying conventional paradigms, and the internet is devoid of satisfying explanations beyond gross description of a few parameters. The "inner working" are wholely absent. You are entirely devoid of a coherent explanation, and empty of any predictive theory. You are not even capable of taking the most basic measurements off of the photographic data, as your faux paux mistaking 70,000 km^2 for 70,000 MILES^2 shows. You are simply unequipped to understand the photographic data plaqced in front of your face. The thing was PHOTOGRAPHED and measured up the yin-yang, you friggin' dunce. NOAA satellites provided the public, including you and me, the images, and the US Navy made their own archives as did I. Reality does not go away because you find it an inconvenient truth. science doesn't bend to your will. even if you hope real hard. Bebinca cared nothing as to whether or not you or I were watching. It obeyed the laws of physics. I witnessed the event and recorded the entire sequence using every publically available satellite channel in existence. That's why I happen to be in possession of 331 megabytes of satellite imagery on my hard drive and you possess zero bytes. GOOGLE is the impartial witness: http://snipurl.com/ys6b There are 11 links to the webpage http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html going back to September 6, 2006. In fact the webpage is stored in a directory labelled "temp_sep_06". This is one full month ahead of the phenomena of Bebinca. On October 07, 2006 though most of October 08 my computer was disfunctional due to a power supply failure. During the blackout period I failed to download the 500 to 800 satellite images I normally process every day. You of course cannot supply any copies of missing data because you have none, because you don't even understand why you would need any to understand what the Earth is teaching about physics to those who look with a prepared mind. I do however have a reasonably complete collection of the aftermath of Bebinca, which drifted north off the coast of Japan, up into and across Alaska, and bent backwards south through western Canada and then preceeded easterly acroos North America. The Alaska loop caused three days of severe windstorms that coated powerline insulators wirh dust, then a rain which created a conductive mud and power failures which shut off the northern end of the Prudoe Bay Alaska Pipeline. The southern end of the pipeline was closed by flooding conditions along a 65 mile stretch, which has been cleared. The pipeline system is still partially disabled at this hour because of the remnants of Tropical Storm Bebinca. Once again I have sequential hour-by-hour photographs and you have Kansas MOONIE Creationist Denialism. Which am I going to believe -- the right-turd or my lying eyes? Until somebody shows photographic evidence differently this stands as the largest IR emitter ever photographed on planet Earth. this may be. this is the least nutty thing that you've said, so far. You are the one out of touch with physics of planet Earth. Again, no coherent alternative explanation from you, just typical republican badmouthing of science statements to discredit them. The emissions were at the top of the instrument calibrations and may have exceeded the instruments capability to record excess emissions. swamping a sensor occasionally happens. shrug turn down the gain and resample. this kind of data collection occurs all the time in digital photographic astronomy. its no big deal. What was photographed is the largest Earth-based photon event in the history of satellite photography. If you can point to a larger one, do so. Bebinca was photographed by a fleet of satellites, not just one. The Navy archives site has satellite coverage from an entire fleet of satellites sweeping the area in overlapping fashion, and this is just the public non-classified satellites. One wonders what the military saw from their more sophisticated spy satellites. 31 of the 50 States of the United States are smaller than this event in terms of Earth surface coverage. That big Ice Melt lake in the Arctic that people were recently talking about was only slightly over half the size of this CO2 LASER event, only 38,000 square miles versus 70,000 square miles. huh? despite what you believe, its not a laser. I believe you are a republican ass who doesn't understand that LASERs exist because the natural laws of physics permit them to exist. Under appropriate conditions materials will LASE naturally, whether you like it or not. You are just another stupid republican who spends too much time thinking about getting into boys behinds. and you are still a self replicating puppet master that spews nonsense. Explain why the Repig leadership didn't call the cops on Foley 3 years ago? They knew then, as WE ALL KNOW NOW that he was a sexual predator violating laws. |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites-- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote:
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html 10.7 microns is a a Co2 emission wave length that has a lot of gain and thus can be used for constructing a cheap and easy laser. However it is also an atmospheric window that is used for remote sensing. I would caution you to conclude that the emission at 10.7 is related to the laser phenomena. Yes, large convective complexes like hurricanes dump an incredible amount of energy as a heat engine and that maybe related to G.W. in time as evidence grows. My feeling is that your laser conclusion is stretching it a bit if you are using the scientific method to reach your conclusions. dan |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:09:56 GMT, "Ray Lopez
ion" wrote: beav wrote in : On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:30:18 GMT, "Ray Lopez ion" wrote: beav wrote in : On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:15:10 GMT, Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html you mean it emitted a coherent stream of photons from a mix of CO2 and H2O by stimulated emmission? That's what the satellite photographed. IR in the 10.7 micron wavelength at intensities not normal, in an area of 70,000 square miles, which persisted for hours duration at peak and at unseen before levels over two days time. its not over 70000 km. the most intense areas are quite a bit smaller in area. 70,000 SQUARE MILES is larger than 70,000 km^2, and 70,000 MILES^2 is what can be measured from the photographic data. my bad. i was thinking metric, not english. what i apparently didn't articulate too well is that the entire area of ioke (70,000 square miles) is not emitting this huge "lasing" area. the areas that you are mistakenly conjecturing as "lasing" is small regions of the hottest, most dense, part of the hurricane. if it was coherent, the intensity would show as black or whatever burned out pixels look like. This is your shabby republican science education at work again. Did you go to Kansas Creationist Science Schools? Lasers can be mild as checkout scanners or intense enough that they melt through steel as cutting lasers. Your mistake is to think they only have one peak intensity parameter. At 25,000 miles in space, very few of the IR photons actually reach the sensors. Mostly they difuse. THe sensors are built rugged enough to capture natural levels of peak intensity, and nobody really knows how many test sensors they did burn out befoire they arrived at the threshhold level of instrument ruggedness appropriate for natural phenomena. The detectors have unused upper detection threshhold which rarely ever gets activated by natural events. In this case the unused portion was used because the intensity exceeded the photon emissions of even Hurricane Wilma, the strongest hurricane ever measured in the Atlantic Basin. You are just a knee-jerk opposer operating by compulsive reflex without thinking and processing data. You did go to Moonie Kansas "Intelligunt Desine" classes, didn't you? Admit it. sigh the sensors are "light buckets". they count photons and stack them in pixels. when the "bucket" gets filled, its considered swamped. if you spent more than a few minutes downloading this stuff, the green area is simply at the maximal value of the sensor. its still on the scale. if it was lasing, you'd be dumping streams of COHERENT photons into just a few pixels. you wouldn't get photons "diffusing" over the distance form the storm to the satellite. laser reflectors on the moon accept laser shots, reflect light back to the source and only spread out by feet. i'm not opposing anything. you have made a mistake. i'm just pointing it out. do i get to post a "rumsfield snuf flics LIES AND GOT CAUGHT" post? the pictures of ioke were very interesting. i don't know what "emissions of the green area are not by obvious means" means... its the very hottest part of the hurricane. what's the big deal? There are "conventionl paradigms" which explain what the IR detectors "mean". The plain fact is the detectors detect -- that's all they do. If photons arrive physically at the location of the detector then they are detected, else not. It really is that simple. Interpretation of the IR photons being detected is applied paradigms, putting "meanng" to the image created. The wrong paradigm will apply the wrong "meaning" and deceive about the underlying physics in operation which generated those IR photons. The statement is a warning not to jump to conclusions by applying paradigms recklessly with disregard for the totality of the known facts. what? this is nuttier nonsense. 2763 MT of TNT energy MEASURED? or just calculated? your next exercise is to calculate the background level of energy form the area normally existing. further, compare that to the "MTs of energy" that cover the globe every day. The measurements were performed by a fleet of satellites with data processed by the US Navy for navigational knowledge and security issues. The stimulated emissions were concurrent with precipitation of rain as a byproduct of the emission of IR energy -- with the decrease in energy, liquid water bonds were able to form. The measured rainfail is a reciprical of the emitted energy: know either one and you know the other automatically. The latent heat of fusion for change of state from vapor to liquid is known with great precision and has been known for centuries. one of your other sock puppets came up with this "laser" baloney... do you have any idea what you're talking about? Yes, natural formation of CO2 gas, H2O catalyst, amplification and stimulated emission of infrared light radiant energy. That's what the word "LASER" was invented to describe: L = Light, A = Amplification, S = Stimulated, E = Emission, R = Radiation. that's why i bought it up. no stimulated emission is occurring. It it is NOT stimulated, then provde an alternate explanation for what is photographed. It certainly is not a normal presence. This "abnormality" existed to be photographed because it's abnormal presense was stimulated into existence. Words actually do have meanings -- stimulated has a meaning, and I used it within the defined parameters of that meaning. You are simply denying photographic evidence and playingmutation games with words. You have no alternative decription of the causal factors producing a rare abnormality. see your tripe above. stimulated emission is required for a laser to be a laser. anything else at that frequency is just warm. A normal CO2 gas laser is a tube filled with CO2, Nitrogen and Water Vapor, to which electricity is applied. The electrons energize the Nitrogen which emits photons, which are absorbed by the CO2 through H2O catalysis, and the CO2 then spontaneously forms an emission stream. The sidewalls contain the stream of photons and a full reflector on the back forces a one-way stream through a semi-reflective front. Exactly what was seen here. ummmm. no. you need CO2, N2 and He in a reflective flow thru chamber, under a relative vacuum (10-100 torr) O2 will quench any population inversion. Not under the circumstances seen here. Laboratories have a difficulty of producing the "gigawatts" of power of natural lightening strokes, whereas tropical storms have no shortages of lightning available. What is your measurement of the "air pressure" in the passage zone of a gigawatt flow of electricity in a smal space of time? What do you think causes the "thunder" sound, if not the instantaneous creation of a violent displacement of air molecules my multi-millions of Ampreres of electrons flowing? lets stay on task here. there is no way to get CO2 to lase under the conditions of a hurricane. say it. SAY IT! that other stuff is baloney. The thunderstorm activity provided the charges of lightening. The rainfall curtains provided a reflective sidewalls, the wet watery surface provided the impermeable rear reflector, the atmoshere donated the CO2, H2O vapor and Nitrogen gases, and Global Warming provided the base system energy. what? its an engineering project at its most simple. forming in a hurricane? cmon. Kansas Creationist Scienticklish-Flavored Denialism again. "Hot Towers" is an established cyclone terminology associated with these radiant events. The terminology is nearly a decade old at this point. The elucidation has never been achieved by applying conventional paradigms, and the internet is devoid of satisfying explanations beyond gross description of a few parameters. The "inner working" are wholely absent. You are entirely devoid of a coherent explanation, and empty of any predictive theory. You are not even capable of taking the most basic measurements off of the photographic data, as your faux paux mistaking 70,000 km^2 for 70,000 MILES^2 shows. You are simply unequipped to understand the photographic data plaqced in front of your face. and you seem heck bent on seeing something that isn't there, nor could it ever be there. let it go. just let it go. The thing was PHOTOGRAPHED and measured up the yin-yang, you friggin' dunce. NOAA satellites provided the public, including you and me, the images, and the US Navy made their own archives as did I. Reality does not go away because you find it an inconvenient truth. science doesn't bend to your will. even if you hope real hard. Bebinca cared nothing as to whether or not you or I were watching. It obeyed the laws of physics. I witnessed the event and recorded the entire sequence using every publically available satellite channel in existence. That's why I happen to be in possession of 331 megabytes of satellite imagery on my hard drive and you possess zero bytes. GOOGLE is the impartial witness: http://snipurl.com/ys6b There are 11 links to the webpage http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html going back to September 6, 2006. In fact the webpage is stored in a directory labelled "temp_sep_06". This is one full month ahead of the phenomena of Bebinca. On October 07, 2006 though most of October 08 my computer was disfunctional due to a power supply failure. During the blackout period I failed to download the 500 to 800 satellite images I normally process every day. You of course cannot supply any copies of missing data because you have none, because you don't even understand why you would need any to understand what the Earth is teaching about physics to those who look with a prepared mind. I do however have a reasonably complete collection of the aftermath of Bebinca, which drifted north off the coast of Japan, up into and across Alaska, and bent backwards south through western Canada and then preceeded easterly acroos North America. The Alaska loop caused three days of severe windstorms that coated powerline insulators wirh dust, then a rain which created a conductive mud and power failures which shut off the northern end of the Prudoe Bay Alaska Pipeline. The southern end of the pipeline was closed by flooding conditions along a 65 mile stretch, which has been cleared. The pipeline system is still partially disabled at this hour because of the remnants of Tropical Storm Bebinca. Once again I have sequential hour-by-hour photographs and you have Kansas MOONIE Creationist Denialism. Which am I going to believe -- the right-turd or my lying eyes? Until somebody shows photographic evidence differently this stands as the largest IR emitter ever photographed on planet Earth. this may be. this is the least nutty thing that you've said, so far. You are the one out of touch with physics of planet Earth. Again, no coherent alternative explanation from you, just typical republican badmouthing of science statements to discredit them. sigh for it to be a laser, it must emit coherent light by stimulated emission. science? you? cmon! The emissions were at the top of the instrument calibrations and may have exceeded the instruments capability to record excess emissions. swamping a sensor occasionally happens. shrug turn down the gain and resample. this kind of data collection occurs all the time in digital photographic astronomy. its no big deal. What was photographed is the largest Earth-based photon event in the history of satellite photography. If you can point to a larger one, do so. Bebinca was photographed by a fleet of satellites, not just one. The Navy archives site has satellite coverage from an entire fleet of satellites sweeping the area in overlapping fashion, and this is just the public non-classified satellites. One wonders what the military saw from their more sophisticated spy satellites. 31 of the 50 States of the United States are smaller than this event in terms of Earth surface coverage. That big Ice Melt lake in the Arctic that people were recently talking about was only slightly over half the size of this CO2 LASER event, only 38,000 square miles versus 70,000 square miles. huh? despite what you believe, its not a laser. I believe you are a republican ass who doesn't understand that LASERs exist because the natural laws of physics permit them to exist. Under appropriate conditions materials will LASE naturally, whether you like it or not. You are just another stupid republican who spends too much time thinking about getting into boys behinds. and you are still a self replicating puppet master that spews nonsense. Explain why the Repig leadership didn't call the cops on Foley 3 years ago? They knew then, as WE ALL KNOW NOW that he was a sexual predator violating laws. Barney Frank, Gerry Studds, Bill Clinton.... but i'm here to poke a hole in your ridiculous contention that hurricanes spawn CO2 lasers. politics have nothing to do with your looney pseudoscience. |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
beavith wrote in
: On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:09:56 GMT, "Ray Lopez ion" wrote: beav wrote in m: On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:30:18 GMT, "Ray Lopez ion" wrote: beav wrote in m: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:15:10 GMT, Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html you mean it emitted a coherent stream of photons from a mix of CO2 and H2O by stimulated emmission? That's what the satellite photographed. IR in the 10.7 micron wavelength at intensities not normal, in an area of 70,000 square miles, which persisted for hours duration at peak and at unseen before levels over two days time. its not over 70000 km. the most intense areas are quite a bit smaller in area. 70,000 SQUARE MILES is larger than 70,000 km^2, and 70,000 MILES^2 is what can be measured from the photographic data. my bad. i was thinking metric, not english. what i apparently didn't articulate too well is that the entire area of ioke (70,000 square miles) is not emitting this huge "lasing" area. the areas that you are mistakenly conjecturing as "lasing" is small regions of the hottest, most dense, part of the hurricane. What you didn't cogitate too well is BEBINCA is the extraordinary radiat light source, compared to the #1 most intense strongest longest hurricane of the Pacific for comparison. IOKE radiated weakly compared to BEBINCA, and IOKE could fit inside the central hot spot of BEBINCA entirely. You missed the main event and concentrated on the side show. if it was coherent, the intensity would show as black or whatever burned out pixels look like. This is your shabby republican science education at work again. Did you go to Kansas Creationist Science Schools? Lasers can be mild as checkout scanners or intense enough that they melt through steel as cutting lasers. Your mistake is to think they only have one peak intensity parameter. At 25,000 miles in space, very few of the IR photons actually reach the sensors. Mostly they difuse. THe sensors are built rugged enough to capture natural levels of peak intensity, and nobody really knows how many test sensors they did burn out befoire they arrived at the threshhold level of instrument ruggedness appropriate for natural phenomena. The detectors have unused upper detection threshhold which rarely ever gets activated by natural events. In this case the unused portion was used because the intensity exceeded the photon emissions of even Hurricane Wilma, the strongest hurricane ever measured in the Atlantic Basin. You are just a knee-jerk opposer operating by compulsive reflex without thinking and processing data. You did go to Moonie Kansas "Intelligunt Desine" classes, didn't you? Admit it. sigh the sensors are "light buckets". they count photons and stack them in pixels. when the "bucket" gets filled, its considered swamped. if you spent more than a few minutes downloading this stuff, the green area is simply at the maximal value of the sensor. its still on the scale. NO. The green area has a white area to the right of it. Green against red is a color clash because they are opposite sides of the colorwheel, so the green intensity of the Funktop color enhansement palette is easy to see. However, on the Rainbow (white on red) and WaterVapor (white on dark blue) color palettes additional colors are easier to see than the white on green of the Funktop. At no time did the total scale of the sensors get swamped. THe most rightward readings of light photon intensity of Bebinca exceeded the max intensity of the Pacific's strongest storm, and the high intensity AVERAGE of the hot spot of BEBINCA that was as intense as IOKE was larger than ALL OF IOKE. You are having major problems absorbing reality that you don't want to face. Three links: http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html The first has 9 different copies of the same data on the bottom of the page, and all the color palettes. The second link compares IOKE and BEBINCA size to size, side by side. The navy uses 2 degrees latitude and longitude lines, 5 boxes = 10 degrees, while the NOAA satelittes uses 2.5 degrees boxes, 4 boxes = 10 degrees. IOKE and BEBINCA were on the same latitude when these comparison pictures were taken so it is comparing apples to apples, oranges to oranges sizewise. The picture comparing BEBICA to FLORENCE at the far right shows the BEBINCA hot spot was 5 degrees wide, 306 miles across. Pi x r^2 = 70,000 miles in area. if it was lasing, you'd be dumping streams of COHERENT photons into just a few pixels. you wouldn't get photons "diffusing" over the distance form the storm to the satellite. laser reflectors on the moon accept laser shots, reflect light back to the source and only spread out by feet. Your definition is unnecessarily strict. LASER means light amplification, which we have here (that is more light than there would have been) by the stimulated emission of RADIATION (which is what the satelitte senses. "Coherency" is not technically part of the LASER definition and need not exist to have lasing -- it is strictly an artifact of the reflectivity of the sidewalls. In this case the sidewalls are imperfectly reflective so that LASING without tight coherency resulted. You just don't understand the quantum mechanics of light emission. There is nothing in quantum mechanics which requires coherency for there to be stimulated emission of radiation, nor is there any requirement in quantum mechanics that there cannot be feedback amplification without coherency. You made up a rule that doesn't exoist in the definition nor exist in physics or nature. Coherency is a secondary quality of lasers priced for it's usefulness, but it is not a mandatory part of the definition. i'm not opposing anything. you have made a mistake. i'm just pointing it out. do i get to post a "rumsfield snuf flics LIES AND GOT CAUGHT" post? by all means... post that 1,000 million times. the pictures of ioke were very interesting. i don't know what "emissions of the green area are not by obvious means" means... its the very hottest part of the hurricane. what's the big deal? There are "conventionl paradigms" which explain what the IR detectors "mean". The plain fact is the detectors detect -- that's all they do. If photons arrive physically at the location of the detector then they are detected, else not. It really is that simple. Interpretation of the IR photons being detected is applied paradigms, putting "meanng" to the image created. The wrong paradigm will apply the wrong "meaning" and deceive about the underlying physics in operation which generated those IR photons. The statement is a warning not to jump to conclusions by applying paradigms recklessly with disregard for the totality of the known facts. what? this is nuttier nonsense. You not only can't comprehend what you read, nor interpret photographic evidence placed in front of your face, now you are admitting that you don't comprehend cognition principles. The Navy applies a legend on the bottom of their images of BEBINCA with a colorcode indicating temperature. The more "IR heat photons" the colder they describe it, -90 degrees C. Their paradigm is based on heat expansion drive cloud tops higher and the air is colder higher, therefore what they are seeing is the temperature of the highest coldest cloudtops. That's a "paradigm", a frame of reference, that "more heat = colder". The warning given is to not leap to paradigms recklessly in disregard for the full set of known facts. IOKE's emissions are not due to high winds, and Hurricane John and Tropical Storm Aletta are shown as reminder that emissions are not a product of wind force. That page was a month before BEBINCA. Nothing nuttier about the warning. You jumped to the conclusion that I was pointing out IOKE IR emissions when BEBINCA is the champion emitter of the year -- a rush to judgement on your part. 2763 MT of TNT energy MEASURED? or just calculated? your next exercise is to calculate the background level of energy form the area normally existing. further, compare that to the "MTs of energy" that cover the globe every day. The measurements were performed by a fleet of satellites with data processed by the US Navy for navigational knowledge and security issues. The stimulated emissions were concurrent with precipitation of rain as a byproduct of the emission of IR energy -- with the decrease in energy, liquid water bonds were able to form. The measured rainfail is a reciprical of the emitted energy: know either one and you know the other automatically. The latent heat of fusion for change of state from vapor to liquid is known with great precision and has been known for centuries. one of your other sock puppets came up with this "laser" baloney... do you have any idea what you're talking about? Yes, natural formation of CO2 gas, H2O catalyst, amplification and stimulated emission of infrared light radiant energy. That's what the word "LASER" was invented to describe: L = Light, A = Amplification, S = Stimulated, E = Emission, R = Radiation. that's why i bought it up. no stimulated emission is occurring. It it is NOT stimulated, then provde an alternate explanation for what is photographed. It certainly is not a normal presence. This "abnormality" existed to be photographed because it's abnormal presense was stimulated into existence. Words actually do have meanings -- stimulated has a meaning, and I used it within the defined parameters of that meaning. You are simply denying photographic evidence and playingmutation games with words. You have no alternative decription of the causal factors producing a rare abnormality. see your tripe above. stimulated emission is required for a laser to be a laser. anything else at that frequency is just warm. All that is required is LASING. Lasers may be invisible light without heat. Heat, temperature, is no part of LASER definition. You have no explanation for the IR raduation of BEBINCA. There it wasn't, then there it was, then there it wasn't again. Some set of factors caused emission of IR energy at outbursts not seen elsewhere before or afterwards. You don't understand those factors. EMISSION was STIMULATED as RADIATION at AMPLIFICATION levels not found in normal nature, in the form of infrared LIGHT. All of the requirements for LASER were satisfied. You not only do not understand the physics of the event, you don't even understand that an event occurred. The event that you do not know occurred poured nine inches of rain on Alaska and knocked out both ends of the Alaska Pipeline, which is still throttled mostly off at this instant of time. You are simply unable to connect events travelling slowly hour by hour 5,000 miles away to be connected together. To help poor befuddled people like you I went into my treasure trove that I have and you don't to pull out pictures of BEBINCA moving from the tropical Pacific to the Arctic. Here, you poor sap, Kansas Monkey unevolved enough to understand Human Science with your Creationist Republican "ejucation". Here's more pretty pictures for you to look at and not have a clue that they have physical reality meaning to them... http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html A normal CO2 gas laser is a tube filled with CO2, Nitrogen and Water Vapor, to which electricity is applied. The electrons energize the Nitrogen which emits photons, which are absorbed by the CO2 through H2O catalysis, and the CO2 then spontaneously forms an emission stream. The sidewalls contain the stream of photons and a full reflector on the back forces a one-way stream through a semi-reflective front. Exactly what was seen here. ummmm. no. you need CO2, N2 and He in a reflective flow thru chamber, under a relative vacuum (10-100 torr) O2 will quench any population inversion. Not under the circumstances seen here. Laboratories have a difficulty of producing the "gigawatts" of power of natural lightening strokes, whereas tropical storms have no shortages of lightning available. What is your measurement of the "air pressure" in the passage zone of a gigawatt flow of electricity in a smal space of time? What do you think causes the "thunder" sound, if not the instantaneous creation of a violent displacement of air molecules my multi-millions of Ampreres of electrons flowing? lets stay on task here. there is no way to get CO2 to lase under the conditions of a hurricane. say it. SAY IT! that other stuff is baloney. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html The thunderstorm activity provided the charges of lightening. The rainfall curtains provided a reflective sidewalls, the wet watery surface provided the impermeable rear reflector, the atmoshere donated the CO2, H2O vapor and Nitrogen gases, and Global Warming provided the base system energy. what? its an engineering project at its most simple. forming in a hurricane? cmon. Kansas Creationist Scienticklish-Flavored Denialism again. "Hot Towers" is an established cyclone terminology associated with these radiant events. The terminology is nearly a decade old at this point. The elucidation has never been achieved by applying conventional paradigms, and the internet is devoid of satisfying explanations beyond gross description of a few parameters. The "inner working" are wholely absent. You are entirely devoid of a coherent explanation, and empty of any predictive theory. You are not even capable of taking the most basic measurements off of the photographic data, as your faux paux mistaking 70,000 km^2 for 70,000 MILES^2 shows. You are simply unequipped to understand the photographic data plaqced in front of your face. and you seem heck bent on seeing something that isn't there, nor could it ever be there. let it go. just let it go. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html The thing was PHOTOGRAPHED and measured up the yin-yang, you friggin' dunce. NOAA satellites provided the public, including you and me, the images, and the US Navy made their own archives as did I. Reality does not go away because you find it an inconvenient truth. science doesn't bend to your will. even if you hope real hard. Bebinca cared nothing as to whether or not you or I were watching. It obeyed the laws of physics. I witnessed the event and recorded the entire sequence using every publically available satellite channel in existence. That's why I happen to be in possession of 331 megabytes of satellite imagery on my hard drive and you possess zero bytes. GOOGLE is the impartial witness: http://snipurl.com/ys6b There are 11 links to the webpage http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html going back to September 6, 2006. In fact the webpage is stored in a directory labelled "temp_sep_06". This is one full month ahead of the phenomena of Bebinca. On October 07, 2006 though most of October 08 my computer was disfunctional due to a power supply failure. During the blackout period I failed to download the 500 to 800 satellite images I normally process every day. You of course cannot supply any copies of missing data because you have none, because you don't even understand why you would need any to understand what the Earth is teaching about physics to those who look with a prepared mind. I do however have a reasonably complete collection of the aftermath of Bebinca, which drifted north off the coast of Japan, up into and across Alaska, and bent backwards south through western Canada and then preceeded easterly acroos North America. The Alaska loop caused three days of severe windstorms that coated powerline insulators wirh dust, then a rain which created a conductive mud and power failures which shut off the northern end of the Prudoe Bay Alaska Pipeline. The southern end of the pipeline was closed by flooding conditions along a 65 mile stretch, which has been cleared. The pipeline system is still partially disabled at this hour because of the remnants of Tropical Storm Bebinca. Once again I have sequential hour-by-hour photographs and you have Kansas MOONIE Creationist Denialism. Which am I going to believe -- the right-turd or my lying eyes? Until somebody shows photographic evidence differently this stands as the largest IR emitter ever photographed on planet Earth. this may be. this is the least nutty thing that you've said, so far. You are the one out of touch with physics of planet Earth. Again, no coherent alternative explanation from you, just typical republican badmouthing of science statements to discredit them. sigh for it to be a laser, it must emit coherent light by stimulated emission. science? you? cmon! http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html The emissions were at the top of the instrument calibrations and may have exceeded the instruments capability to record excess emissions. swamping a sensor occasionally happens. shrug turn down the gain and resample. this kind of data collection occurs all the time in digital photographic astronomy. its no big deal. What was photographed is the largest Earth-based photon event in the history of satellite photography. If you can point to a larger one, do so. Bebinca was photographed by a fleet of satellites, not just one. The Navy archives site has satellite coverage from an entire fleet of satellites sweeping the area in overlapping fashion, and this is just the public non-classified satellites. One wonders what the military saw from their more sophisticated spy satellites. 31 of the 50 States of the United States are smaller than this event in terms of Earth surface coverage. That big Ice Melt lake in the Arctic that people were recently talking about was only slightly over half the size of this CO2 LASER event, only 38,000 square miles versus 70,000 square miles. huh? despite what you believe, its not a laser. I believe you are a republican ass who doesn't understand that LASERs exist because the natural laws of physics permit them to exist. Under appropriate conditions materials will LASE naturally, whether you like it or not. You are just another stupid republican who spends too much time thinking about getting into boys behinds. and you are still a self replicating puppet master that spews nonsense. Explain why the Repig leadership didn't call the cops on Foley 3 years ago? They knew then, as WE ALL KNOW NOW that he was a sexual predator violating laws. Barney Frank, Gerry Studds, Bill Clinton.... but i'm here to poke a hole in your ridiculous contention that hurricanes spawn CO2 lasers. politics have nothing to do with your looney pseudoscience. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca_to_A...o_Alaska2.html |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
Dan Mckenna wrote in
news:_HiXg.2682$xI4.2223@fed1read11: Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages wrote: Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/ioke...a_compare.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html 10.7 microns is a a Co2 emission wave length that has a lot of gain and thus can be used for constructing a cheap and easy laser. However it is also an atmospheric window that is used for remote sensing. 10.7 microns is the wavelength turned to thick raincloud formation and good general approximations of rainfail can be predicted from the intensity of the radiation. The "Funktop" color enhancement palette is organized to visually highlight the rainfall intensity based on the release of IR emissions as latent heat is expelled from water vapor condensing into raindrops. Current examples: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/mtsat/wpac/ft-l.jpg http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/mtsat/wcpac/ft-l.jpg http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/mtsat/nwpac/ft-l.jpg I would caution you to conclude that the emission at 10.7 is related to the laser phenomena. First law of conservation of energy: energy is neither created nor destroyed. The photographs show that heat energy as IR photons was present at certain times and dates. If it is there in great abundance, it's presence is AMPLIFIED over the norm. That it is LIGHT is part of the definition of IR RADIATION. That it was STIMULATED to be EMITTED goes without argument. We are plainly dealing with quantum mechanics LASER phenomena of a natural form here. The question is not "Is it a LASER", but "How does a Natural LASER form and function"? Yes, large convective complexes like hurricanes dump an incredible amount of energy as a heat engine and that maybe related to G.W. in time as evidence grows. This is a failed paradigm. Hurricanes form in waters at or above 82 oF, 26 oC, better at higher temps. However, to call that a "heat engine" is probably misleading -- people go to the beach on hot days to jump into waters of those temperatures to "cool off". It is less than bathtub water hot, not very lukewarm actually. The rainfall wake following a hurricane leaves a cool trail of waters which have been 10-12 kilometers high to cool considerably from exposure to -60 to -80 degrees C cloudtop temps. That is not at all the same thing as extracting heat from the ocean below, and one needs to distinguish between the two to determine what heat (if any) has been removed from the oceans and what mechanism caused it's absense. 80 degree bathwater does not sponteously combust into hurricanes. Without a complete picture of hurricane genesis you are not in any position to determine if "global warming" has any effect on hurricane genesis and intensification. You are not entitled to even hold an opinion on the subject, being an incomplete student rather than a master. My feeling is that your laser conclusion is stretching it a bit if you are using the scientific method to reach your conclusions. dan The scientific method is in many ways similar to the Sherlock Holmes method "When one has eliminated all of the impossible explanations than the explanation remaining is the most plausible regardless of how improbable it seems". By comparing BEBINCA to IOKE, FLORENCE, JOHN and ALETTA I have eliminated wind speed or force as a factor. 165 mph IOKE burned brightly for 39 consecutive hours, but Hurricane John was as bright at category 2 hurricane rating and Tropical Storm Aletta and Florence were both around 50 miles per hour at their most radiant. BEBINCA never exceeded 55 mph. Latitude can be ruled out: IOKE and BEBINCA were both compared at the same latitude. Latitude and Longitude were both ruled out: BEBINCA and category-4 Xangsane both occupied the same physical location just one week apart. The environmental conditions were very similar 7 days apart. Xangsane may offer a clue for further investigation. Operating as a paddle-wheel rotating counterclockwise Xangsane may have ventilated critical gases from it's west and south around to it's east where they became incorporated in BEBINCA. Both the Philippines and Indonesia reported improved air quality related to Xansane's passage. It is at the location where BEBINCA was most likely to have encountered those effluents fanned eastwards by Xangsane that the explosive bloating occurred. ======== http://www.brudirect.com/DailyInfo/N...906/nite05.htm Haze To Persist For Days: Met Office ... Bandar Seri Begawan - Thick haze has blanketed the sultanate over the past few days, restricting visibility to less than 3 kilometres as recorded by the Weather Centre, Department of Civil Aviation in Berakas. ... The Meteorological Office also said that severe tropical storm "Xangsane" over central Philippines is maintaining the low level south to southwesterly wind flows which keep transporting smoke particulates from Kalimantan to Northwest Borneo. ======== http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp...0061002143515& sec=nation Monday October 2, 2006 ... Smoke from forest fires blankets large swath of Indonesia - JAKARTA: Smoke and ash from land-clearing fires in Indonesia blanketed a large swath of the country's west on Monday, forcing residents to wear protective masks, sending air quality plummeting and delaying flights, officials and media reports said. Skies were also hazy in neighboring Singapore due to the fires, a media report there said. The smoke was shrouding an estimated 556,000 square kilometers (215,000 square miles) of land on the western islands of Sumatra and Borneo, officials and media reports said. "The haze has persisted for a whole week,'' said Frans Tandipau, a senior official tasked with extinguishing forest fires on Sumatra island. Fires from land-clearing activities in Sumatra and Borneo islands, and to a lesser extent Malaysia, have occurred almost every dry season since the late 1990s. ======== One should not underestimate the various combustion gases in Southeast asia. We are used to rating emissions by country whereas the industria centers of Japan, Korea and Coastal China are all clustered in a district the size of Texas. Indonesian forest fires in 1998 burned the equivilent to 40% of the world's total car exhaust per year of CO2, and the conditions are as severe this year. That means that possibly the equal to 25% of the world's addition of CO2 happened in the vacinity of this BEBINCA event. |
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured
"Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages"
wrote in message Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy equivilent each peak hour measured. The secondary results of humans having boosted our global warming past the point of no return is certinly becoming clear as this natural "CO2-H2O LASER" http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html However, the only thing natural going on is the matter of fact that we humans are the most likely natural cause of such a concentrated formation of energy, though still a fraction of what our nearby mascon of a moon is contributing on a global basis. Of course it has been the jobs of the Usenet rusemasters and naysayers to wag-thy-dogs to death, and that's exactly what they've been doing all along. (must be a Jewish thing because, only the wealthy and most powerful of this horrific environmental change are going to survive the long term results, and at a good Exxon style profit to boot) The concentrated "300,000,000 megawatthours per hour at it's peak" is an impressive showing, as to what's possible and no longer a what-if of our future. Add in a greater concentration of CO2 and it should only get more interesting as these storms become more frequent, larger and having extended lifespans. Amazing as to what lowering the albedo of mother Earth will actually do. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk