![]() |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
goozu :) |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
Could be anything from pollution carried by winds, African dust
(including bacteria, etc.) carried to the Amazon, contrails in the sky, tropospheric pollution carried to the stratosphere, i.e. the possibilities are many. On Nov 1, 5:01 am, gooza wrote: Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you! goozu :) |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
gooza wrote:
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you! goozu :) You mean the wack-job/Art Bell topic right? Google "chemtrails" or "chemitrails." Be sure to be wearing your AFDB. http://zapatopi.net/afdb/ -- Bill Asher |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:04:04 +0100, Rodney Blackall
wrote: In article , gooza wrote: Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you! If you have been reading old postings to this group then the answer is almost certainly aircraft-engine condensation trails. There was someone who had "proof" that those white vapour trails were in fact sprays of poison being spread by the CIA to doing something rather vague to some ill defined population for an unspecified reason. Nuff said? There must be, somewhere, at lease ONE lone Meteorologist who, upon gazing up at the skies, says, "Hmmmm...those "Mare's tails" are NOT ice crystals at 40,000 feet !" "Those clearly are the residuals of airplanes at approximately that altitude, I saw them go by, but they don't soon go away, as Contrails usually do. In FACT, they not only do not go away, they dissapate, slowly, through a period of HOURS" "Hmmmmm....curious indeed. I wonder exactly WHAT they are? They spread out farther and farther and farther and stay for hours and hours and hours. They LOOK like some very thin film of some chemical or other! Other planes' contrails DO dissapate, in a few seconds, but these....THEY DON'T!" Now, I wonder just WHAT the heck are they"? And that's why I subscribed to and d'loaded all these 20,000 messages from this newsgroup: to get an answer to this contrail vs. Chemtrail question. And here it is the: same old bickering: Republican vs. Democrat, Con versus Lib - ad infinitum, ad nauseum. Surely, I thought, something as scientific as Meteorology ( graphs, data, charts)...a HISTORY of facts, in fact , will be free of politics and partisanship and someone will have the brains to say, "well, let's STUDY this phenomenon". I know, since I was born, 70 years ago, I have NEVER, till very recent times, seen ANYthing like these "clouds". Even if you don't subscribe to the conspiracy theories about this- HOW ABOUT A RATIONAL EXPLANATION? Contrails? Puleeze. Even I can see the difference, and I ain't no Meteorologist. I guess the fact is, you guys don't know either. |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:55:11 -0800,
none , in wrote: + Contrails? Puleeze. Even I can see the difference, and I ain't no + Meteorologist. Yeah, they're contrails. Deal with it, little conspiracy theorist. -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thankyou!
I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:55:11 -0800, none , in wrote: + Contrails? Puleeze. Even I can see the difference, and I ain't no + Meteorologist. Yeah, they're contrails. Deal with it, little conspiracy theorist. Of sinister origin or not, they do affect the weather. |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:05:25 -0800,
David , in wrote: + I R A Darth Aggie wrote: + On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:55:11 -0800, + none , in + wrote: + + + Contrails? Puleeze. Even I can see the difference, and I ain't no + + Meteorologist. + + Yeah, they're contrails. Deal with it, little conspiracy theorist. + + + Of sinister origin or not, they do affect the weather. Yes. Now calculate how much of an affect they contribute. -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thankyou!
I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:05:25 -0800, David , in wrote: + I R A Darth Aggie wrote: + On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:55:11 -0800, + none , in + wrote: + + + Contrails? Puleeze. Even I can see the difference, and I ain't no + + Meteorologist. + + Yeah, they're contrails. Deal with it, little conspiracy theorist. + + + Of sinister origin or not, they do affect the weather. Yes. Now calculate how much of an affect they contribute. http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004...s_climate.html " Chris Rink/Julia Cole Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. (Phone: 757/864-6786/4052) April 27, 2004 RELEASE : 04-140 Clouds Caused By Aircraft Exhaust May Warm The U.S. Climate NASA scientists have found that cirrus clouds, formed by contrails from aircraft engine exhaust, are capable of increasing average surface temperatures enough to account for a warming trend in the United States that occurred between 1975 and 1994. "This result shows the increased cirrus coverage, attributable to air traffic, could account for nearly all of the warming observed over the United States for nearly 20 years starting in 1975, but it is important to acknowledge contrails would add to and not replace any greenhouse gas effect," said Patrick Minnis, senior research scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. The study was published April 15 in the Journal of Climate. "During the same period, warming occurred in many other areas where cirrus coverage decreased or remained steady," he added. "This study demonstrates that human activity has a visible and significant impact on cloud cover and, therefore, on climate. It indicates that contrails should be included in climate change scenarios," Minnis said." |
Anybody knows what are "chemical trails" in the skies? Thank you!
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:33:06 -0800,
David , in wrote: + http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004...s_climate.html + + " Chris Rink/Julia Cole + Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. + (Phone: 757/864-6786/4052) + April 27, 2004 + RELEASE : 04-140 + Clouds Caused By Aircraft Exhaust May Warm The U.S. Climate + + + NASA scientists have found that cirrus clouds, formed by contrails from + aircraft engine exhaust, are capable of increasing average surface + temperatures enough to account for a warming trend in the United States + that occurred between 1975 and 1994. Interesting. I wonder, tho, how much increased albedo these clouds cause, and if that's been measured? -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk