160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Cato" wrote in message
...
On Mar 27, 5:04 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
On Mar 26, 11:20 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"





No we have photgraphs from ships and geographers from that period.

And we have sedement layers which have been studied that show when the
region above was clear water, and we have the measured age of the ice on
the
shelf itself.

In other words, you are a...

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

"Cato" wrote

It's called change.... get used to it...

It's called treason, and you will hang for it.

"Cato" wrote

God VD... You're getting funnier and funnier....
(laughing so hard I almost ****ed myself) :

Almost? Scat boy.

Have you noticed - My Little Libertarian Dung Eater - the three new
sunspot groups on the surface of the sun.

MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Duh........ Scott... have you noticed that they are equator
spots..... Huh???/ They didn't form in the higher or lower latitudes
and move to the equator...... They formed there......

CYCLE 23 SPOTS still Vendicar!!!!!



Cite, please.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Cato" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 11:20 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Cato" wrote

Zero in the previous 100 years???? Your evidence is........
Tell me ....do you have satellite photos from the 1920's???

No we have photgraphs from ships and geographers from that period.

And we have sedement layers which have been studied that show when the
region above was clear water, and we have the measured age of the ice on
the
shelf itself.

In other words, you are a...

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

"Cato" wrote

It's called change.... get used to it...

It's called treason, and you will hang for it.

yah??? So who's going to hang me.. semen breath???



As usual, the denialist has nothing. lol

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"PeterBP" wrote in message
...
Talk-n-Dog wrote:

PeterBP wrote:
Tunderbar wrote:

On Mar 26, 10:15 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Mr Right" wrote

At that rate, Antarctica will disappear in 33,750 years, IF NO MORE
WATER EVER FREEZES TO FORM ICE THERE.
And if the temperature increase wasn't accelerating - which it is -
and
if
CO2 levels were kept at currentl levels - but they are increasing at
a rat
e
of 2% per year.
Last time I looked temperatures aren't "accelerating", they are flat.
So much for 16ppm of co2.

Right, plus who has said temperature deviation is proportional to CO2
content of the atmosphere?

The IPCC Hockey stick?

I don't mean roughly proportional, i mean PRECISELY proportional for ALL
changes in atmospheric CO2. Is it?

ROFLMAO Flunk second grade science, didja?

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Tegiri Nenashi" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 10:38 am, Tunderbar wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:57 am, Roger Coppock wrote:

Huge Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses
Global Warming Blamed For Ice Shelf Collapse That Puts Larger Area At
Risk

Please see:
ttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/25/tech/main3968165.shtml

Antarctica is 5.4 million square miles in area.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica

160 square miles is nothing.

.00002963 of the ice mass.

At that rate it would take 1000 years to lose .02963 of the ice mass.
If that were to happen once a year every year for 1000 years.

Now that is underwhelming.

Well, back in 2002 3,250 sq miles iceberg made a headline:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larsen_Ice_Shelf

That is like 20 times more?

So, extrapolating the trend, we may assume, ice breakage slowed down,
and is scheduled to completely stop.


k00k-a-d00dle-d00000!

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Tegiri Nenashi" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 1:16 pm, Tegiri Nenashi wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:38 am, Tunderbar wrote:





On Mar 26, 10:57 am, Roger Coppock wrote:

Huge Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses
Global Warming Blamed For Ice Shelf Collapse That Puts Larger Area At
Risk

Please see:
ttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/25/tech/main3968165.shtml

Antarctica is 5.4 million square miles in area.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica

160 square miles is nothing.

.00002963 of the ice mass.

At that rate it would take 1000 years to lose .02963 of the ice mass.
If that were to happen once a year every year for 1000 years.

Now that is underwhelming.

Well, back in 2002 3,250 sq miles iceberg made a headline:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larsen_Ice_Shelf

That is like 20 times more?

So, extrapolating the trend, we may assume, ice breakage slowed down,
and is scheduled to completely stop. Question: where would the snow
accumulated in the vast antarctinc interior go? Question #2, how does
this event fit into the falling global temperatures picture? The ice
pack coverage in Antarctica slightly grew, and yet the sky (oops, the
iceberg) is falling?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Even bigger ice breakage event:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceberg_B15

OMG, 17 miles wide ice shelf collapsed! So cranking away 17 miles of
ice, say every decade,


ROFLMAO

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Peter Franks" wrote in message
...
Roger Coppock wrote:
Huge Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses
Global Warming Blamed For Ice Shelf Collapse That Puts Larger Area At
Risk

Please see:
ttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/25/tech/main3968165.shtml

This without context means nothing.

ROFLMAO

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 4:02 pm, Peter Franks wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:
Huge Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses
Global Warming Blamed For Ice Shelf Collapse That Puts Larger Area At
Risk

Please see:
ttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/25/tech/main3968165.shtml

This without context means nothing.

To establish a relevant context, please describe:

- average rate of ice movement in this area at this time of year

- history of rate of ice movement in this area at this time of year

- average amount of ice shed each year

- history of amount of ice shed each year

Gee! I'm pleasantly surprised at you, Peter.
You're acting like a scientist. That's very
rare for this newsgroup.


Actually, he's deflecting with a series of dumbass questions that have
already been answered as part of the research.

The Old Antarctica Crock Is Resurrected. The "Scientists" Aregetting Desperate!
 

On 27/03/08 18:15, in article , "Ouroboros_Rex"
wrote:

Extract From: More Ice Than Ever In Antarctica

Patrick J. Michaels

ROFLMAO

Sorry, no 'it happens' there. As usual, the denialist has nothing.

My reading of the literature indicates a net loss of something like 150
cubic km per year. As in Greenland more snow might be accumulating in
the center but the total ice is dropping.

Next, Patrick J. Michaels is senior fellow in environmental studies at the
Cato Institute which is a libertarian "think tank". His conclusions will
be influenced by his political orientation.
r
He is not publishing in peer review journals that I know of.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

Ouroboros_Rex wrote:

"PeterBP" wrote in message
...
Talk-n-Dog wrote:

PeterBP wrote:
Tunderbar wrote:

On Mar 26, 10:15 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Mr Right" wrote

At that rate, Antarctica will disappear in 33,750 years, IF NO MORE
WATER EVER FREEZES TO FORM ICE THERE.
And if the temperature increase wasn't accelerating - which it is -
and
if
CO2 levels were kept at currentl levels - but they are increasing at
a rat
e
of 2% per year.
Last time I looked temperatures aren't "accelerating", they are flat.
So much for 16ppm of co2.

Right, plus who has said temperature deviation is proportional to CO2
content of the atmosphere?

The IPCC Hockey stick?

I don't mean roughly proportional, i mean PRECISELY proportional for ALL
changes in atmospheric CO2. Is it?

ROFLMAO Flunk second grade science, didja?

Since you ask, I didn't have science until 7th grade and all the way
from there to end of highschool I was at the top of my class.

That aside, do you have an answer for my question, or do you just need
to have it spelled out?

--
regards , Peter B. P. http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals

"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!
 

On Mar 27, 1:19 pm, "Ouroboros_Rex" wrote:
"Cato" wrote in message

...
On Mar 27, 5:04 am, "V-for-Vendicar"





wrote:
On Mar 26, 11:20 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"

No we have photgraphs from ships and geographers from that period.

And we have sedement layers which have been studied that show when the
region above was clear water, and we have the measured age of the ice on
the
shelf itself.

In other words, you are a...

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

"Cato" wrote

It's called change.... get used to it...

It's called treason, and you will hang for it.

"Cato" wrote

God VD... You're getting funnier and funnier....
(laughing so hard I almost ****ed myself) :

Almost? Scat boy.

Have you noticed - My Little Libertarian Dung Eater - the three new
sunspot groups on the surface of the sun.

MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Duh........ Scott... have you noticed that they are equator
spots..... Huh???/ They didn't form in the higher or lower latitudes
and move to the equator...... They formed there......

CYCLE 23 SPOTS still Vendicar!!!!!

Cite, please.- Hide quoted text -


Don't know much about Sunspot cycles do you?

"With all being near the equator, they are still a cycle 23 spots.
A cycle 24 spot would be at a much higher latitude.

The most recent magnetogram shows them to have the magnetic polarity
of cycle 23 spots, in addition to being near the equator."
Cycle 24 remains late. There was one sunspot of high latitude and
reversed magnetic polarity on January 4th, 2008, but none have been
seen since: (False Start in my opinion. cato)

( Possible Cycle 24 spot on far side of the Sun) The solar
holographic image shows a potentially large spot on the far side of
the sun, we'll have to wait until it comes around to see what it is.
The method is not always perfect.

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com...cycle-23-spot/

Also see.. http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ots-erupt.html

There you go Ouroboros_Rex ... you have your cites. Will they
do? Or do you want more cites? Response????