160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

Because, as presented and without context, the story gives the false
impression that this is a major issue of frantic proportions.

Context has been asked for, but Mr. Coppock chooses to ignore those
requests and therefore fosters the false perceptions.

Until context is provided, this isn't news, but propaganda.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

It's happening 15 years ahead of schedule.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

On Mar 30, 5:18*am, Hussein wrote:
Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

It's happening 15 years ahead of schedule.

Ask yourself, whose schedule?

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:18:52 -0700, Hussein sayd
the following:

Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

It's happening 15 years ahead of schedule.

Ahead of WHO'S schedule?

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

Mr Right wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:18 am, Hussein wrote:
Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.
Why is this even news?
It's happening 15 years ahead of schedule.

Ask yourself, whose schedule?

That'll do a lot of good. I believe it's the IPCC timeline for
one-world totalitarian carbon hating carbon life form alliance of
galactic federations.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

Robert Blass wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:18:52 -0700, Hussein sayd
the following:

Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?
It's happening 15 years ahead of schedule.

Ahead of WHO'S schedule?



I don't think the WHO deals with Antarctica much. Not a lot of
contagious disease there.

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

"Robert Blass" wrote
Ahead of WHO'S schedule?

If you have to ask then you are a .......

MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNN

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

"Mr Right" wrote
Ask yourself, whose schedule?

All the Whoos down in Whoville..

160 Sq. Mi. Chunk Of Antarctic Ice Collapses!---Why is this News?
 

"Peter Franks" wrote
Until context is provided, this isn't news, but propaganda.

Translation, the RepubliKKKan believes that the U.S. people are too stupid
to understand the news they watch.