|
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD.
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD.
Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) Rank of the months of March Year Temp C Anomaly Z score 2008 15.40 1.353 2.69 -- ! 2002 15.40 1.353 2.69 1990 15.36 1.313 2.61 2004 15.21 1.163 2.31 2007 15.16 1.113 2.21 2000 15.11 1.063 2.12 2005 15.09 1.043 2.08 2001 14.98 0.933 1.86 1997 14.98 0.933 1.86 2006 14.93 0.883 1.76 1981 14.90 0.853 1.70 1998 14.89 0.843 1.68 2003 14.77 0.723 1.44 . . . MEAN 14.047 0.000 0.00 . . . 1899 13.51 -0.537 -1.07 1897 13.49 -0.557 -1.11 1911 13.46 -0.587 -1.17 1909 13.44 -0.607 -1.21 1887 13.41 -0.637 -1.27 1908 13.39 -0.657 -1.31 1912 13.37 -0.677 -1.35 1884 13.36 -0.687 -1.37 1917 13.28 -0.767 -1.53 1886 13.19 -0.857 -1.71 1888 13.16 -0.887 -1.77 1896 13.15 -0.897 -1.78 1892 13.07 -0.977 -1.94 1898 13.01 -1.037 -2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERERECORD.
Roger Coppock wrote:
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) Rank of the months of March Year Temp C Anomaly Z score 2008 15.40 1.353 2.69 -- ! 2002 15.40 1.353 2.69 1990 15.36 1.313 2.61 2004 15.21 1.163 2.31 2007 15.16 1.113 2.21 2000 15.11 1.063 2.12 2005 15.09 1.043 2.08 2001 14.98 0.933 1.86 1997 14.98 0.933 1.86 2006 14.93 0.883 1.76 1981 14.90 0.853 1.70 1998 14.89 0.843 1.68 2003 14.77 0.723 1.44 . . . MEAN 14.047 0.000 0.00 . . . 1899 13.51 -0.537 -1.07 1897 13.49 -0.557 -1.11 1911 13.46 -0.587 -1.17 1909 13.44 -0.607 -1.21 1887 13.41 -0.637 -1.27 1908 13.39 -0.657 -1.31 1912 13.37 -0.677 -1.35 1884 13.36 -0.687 -1.37 1917 13.28 -0.767 -1.53 1886 13.19 -0.857 -1.71 1888 13.16 -0.887 -1.77 1896 13.15 -0.897 -1.78 1892 13.07 -0.977 -1.94 1898 13.01 -1.037 -2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. What caused the Little Ice Age? |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERERECORD.
On Apr 9, 2:33*pm, Peter Franks wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote: MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. *Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 * Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 * * * * F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, * * * * * * * * *yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) * Rank of the months of March Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score 2008 * 15.40 * * 1.353 * * 2.69 -- ! 2002 * 15.40 * * 1.353 * * 2.69 1990 * 15.36 * * 1.313 * * 2.61 2004 * 15.21 * * 1.163 * * 2.31 2007 * 15.16 * * 1.113 * * 2.21 2000 * 15.11 * * 1.063 * * 2.12 2005 * 15.09 * * 1.043 * * 2.08 2001 * 14.98 * * 0.933 * * 1.86 1997 * 14.98 * * 0.933 * * 1.86 2006 * 14.93 * * 0.883 * * 1.76 1981 * 14.90 * * 0.853 * * 1.70 1998 * 14.89 * * 0.843 * * 1.68 2003 * 14.77 * * 0.723 * * 1.44 *. . . MEAN * 14.047 * *0.000 * * 0.00 *. . . 1899 * 13.51 * *-0.537 * *-1.07 1897 * 13.49 * *-0.557 * *-1.11 1911 * 13.46 * *-0.587 * *-1.17 1909 * 13.44 * *-0.607 * *-1.21 1887 * 13.41 * *-0.637 * *-1.27 1908 * 13.39 * *-0.657 * *-1.31 1912 * 13.37 * *-0.677 * *-1.35 1884 * 13.36 * *-0.687 * *-1.37 1917 * 13.28 * *-0.767 * *-1.53 1886 * 13.19 * *-0.857 * *-1.71 1888 * 13.16 * *-0.887 * *-1.77 1896 * 13.15 * *-0.897 * *-1.78 1892 * 13.07 * *-0.977 * *-1.94 1898 * 13.01 * *-1.037 * *-2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: * -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. * -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. What caused the Little Ice Age? I can say with certainty that the little ice age was caused by big morons who post off topic. You can quote me on this. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD.
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) Rank of the months of March Year Temp C Anomaly Z score 2008 15.40 1.353 2.69 -- ! 2002 15.40 1.353 2.69 1990 15.36 1.313 2.61 2004 15.21 1.163 2.31 2007 15.16 1.113 2.21 2000 15.11 1.063 2.12 2005 15.09 1.043 2.08 2001 14.98 0.933 1.86 1997 14.98 0.933 1.86 2006 14.93 0.883 1.76 1981 14.90 0.853 1.70 1998 14.89 0.843 1.68 2003 14.77 0.723 1.44 . . . MEAN 14.047 0.000 0.00 . . . 1899 13.51 -0.537 -1.07 1897 13.49 -0.557 -1.11 1911 13.46 -0.587 -1.17 1909 13.44 -0.607 -1.21 1887 13.41 -0.637 -1.27 1908 13.39 -0.657 -1.31 1912 13.37 -0.677 -1.35 1884 13.36 -0.687 -1.37 1917 13.28 -0.767 -1.53 1886 13.19 -0.857 -1.71 1888 13.16 -0.887 -1.77 1896 13.15 -0.897 -1.78 1892 13.07 -0.977 -1.94 1898 13.01 -1.037 -2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. In other words, an arbitrary number to start with. Good try though! There are 1539 months of data on this data set: -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERERECORD.
On Apr 9, 4:10*pm, "Clifford" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. *Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 * Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 * * * * F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, * * * * * * * * yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) *Rank of the months of March Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score 2008 * 15.40 * * 1.353 * * 2.69 -- ! 2002 * 15.40 * * 1.353 * * 2.69 1990 * 15.36 * * 1.313 * * 2.61 2004 * 15.21 * * 1.163 * * 2.31 2007 * 15.16 * * 1.113 * * 2.21 2000 * 15.11 * * 1.063 * * 2.12 2005 * 15.09 * * 1.043 * * 2.08 2001 * 14.98 * * 0.933 * * 1.86 1997 * 14.98 * * 0.933 * * 1.86 2006 * 14.93 * * 0.883 * * 1.76 1981 * 14.90 * * 0.853 * * 1.70 1998 * 14.89 * * 0.843 * * 1.68 2003 * 14.77 * * 0.723 * * 1.44 . . . MEAN * 14.047 * *0.000 * * 0.00 . . . 1899 * 13.51 * *-0.537 * *-1.07 1897 * 13.49 * *-0.557 * *-1.11 1911 * 13.46 * *-0.587 * *-1.17 1909 * 13.44 * *-0.607 * *-1.21 1887 * 13.41 * *-0.637 * *-1.27 1908 * 13.39 * *-0.657 * *-1.31 1912 * 13.37 * *-0.677 * *-1.35 1884 * 13.36 * *-0.687 * *-1.37 1917 * 13.28 * *-0.767 * *-1.53 1886 * 13.19 * *-0.857 * *-1.71 1888 * 13.16 * *-0.887 * *-1.77 1896 * 13.15 * *-0.897 * *-1.78 1892 * 13.07 * *-0.977 * *-1.94 1898 * 13.01 * *-1.037 * *-2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. In other words, an arbitrary number to start with. Good try though! NOPE! It is not an arbitrary number, Clifford. The temperature 14 C is very close to the data set mean, which for the Northern Hemisphere during 1880 to 2007 was 14.022 C. It is good data handling practice to have norms near the mean. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: *-- 783 of them are at or above the norm. *-- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERERECORD.
Peter Franks wrote:
What caused the Little Ice Age? Nobody knows. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE
"Peter Franks" wrote What caused the Little Ice Age? Who cares, it was regional. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD.
"Clifford" wrote In other words, an arbitrary number to start with. Good try though! In other words you don't know what a trend is. MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERERECORD.
Roger Coppock wrote:
On Apr 9, 2:33 pm, Peter Franks wrote: Roger Coppock wrote: MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) Rank of the months of March Year Temp C Anomaly Z score 2008 15.40 1.353 2.69 -- ! 2002 15.40 1.353 2.69 1990 15.36 1.313 2.61 2004 15.21 1.163 2.31 2007 15.16 1.113 2.21 2000 15.11 1.063 2.12 2005 15.09 1.043 2.08 2001 14.98 0.933 1.86 1997 14.98 0.933 1.86 2006 14.93 0.883 1.76 1981 14.90 0.853 1.70 1998 14.89 0.843 1.68 2003 14.77 0.723 1.44 . . . MEAN 14.047 0.000 0.00 . . . 1899 13.51 -0.537 -1.07 1897 13.49 -0.557 -1.11 1911 13.46 -0.587 -1.17 1909 13.44 -0.607 -1.21 1887 13.41 -0.637 -1.27 1908 13.39 -0.657 -1.31 1912 13.37 -0.677 -1.35 1884 13.36 -0.687 -1.37 1917 13.28 -0.767 -1.53 1886 13.19 -0.857 -1.71 1888 13.16 -0.887 -1.77 1896 13.15 -0.897 -1.78 1892 13.07 -0.977 -1.94 1898 13.01 -1.037 -2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. What caused the Little Ice Age? I can say with certainty that the little ice age was caused by big morons who post off topic. You can quote me on this. That is not a scientific response. The question is honest and valid, and more importantly, relevant to your original posting. Unfortunately, I can only conclude that either you are not a scientist, or are one of those that can't be bothered in their perception to stoop to discussions that they don't control in entirety. |
MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD.
Peter Franks wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote: On Apr 9, 2:33 pm, Peter Franks wrote: Roger Coppock wrote: MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD. Basic greenhouse gas physics from MIT. http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf Despite fossil fool lies, global mean surface temperatures continue to rise. These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt They represent the results of tens of millions of readings taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected for the urban heat island effect. The Mean March temperature over the last 129 years is 14.047 C. The Variance is 0.25258. The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.5026. Rxy 0.762625 Rxy^2 0.581597 TEMP = 13.378035 + (0.010293 * (YEAR-1879)) Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 176.535308 Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately 0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%! The month of March in the year 2008, is linearly projected to be 14.706, yet it was 15.4. -- 1.4 SIGMA above projected. The sum of the residuals is 32.79756 Exponential least squares fit: TEMP = 13.390381 * e^(.0007268 * (YEAR-1879)) The sum of the residuals is 32.65656 - Compare with linear! (Smaller residuals means a better fit. A two degree of freedom exponential fits better than a two degree of freedom linear.) Rank of the months of March Year Temp C Anomaly Z score 2008 15.40 1.353 2.69 -- ! 2002 15.40 1.353 2.69 1990 15.36 1.313 2.61 2004 15.21 1.163 2.31 2007 15.16 1.113 2.21 2000 15.11 1.063 2.12 2005 15.09 1.043 2.08 2001 14.98 0.933 1.86 1997 14.98 0.933 1.86 2006 14.93 0.883 1.76 1981 14.90 0.853 1.70 1998 14.89 0.843 1.68 2003 14.77 0.723 1.44 . . . MEAN 14.047 0.000 0.00 . . . 1899 13.51 -0.537 -1.07 1897 13.49 -0.557 -1.11 1911 13.46 -0.587 -1.17 1909 13.44 -0.607 -1.21 1887 13.41 -0.637 -1.27 1908 13.39 -0.657 -1.31 1912 13.37 -0.677 -1.35 1884 13.36 -0.687 -1.37 1917 13.28 -0.767 -1.53 1886 13.19 -0.857 -1.71 1888 13.16 -0.887 -1.77 1896 13.15 -0.897 -1.78 1892 13.07 -0.977 -1.94 1898 13.01 -1.037 -2.06 The most recent 172 continuous months, or 14 years and 4 months, on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980 data set norm of 14 C. There are 1539 months of data on this data set: -- 783 of them are at or above the norm. -- 756 of them are below the norm. This run of 172 months above the norm is the result of a warming world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years, otherwise expect it to continue. What caused the Little Ice Age? I can say with certainty that the little ice age was caused by big morons who post off topic. You can quote me on this. That is not a scientific response. The question is honest and valid, and more importantly, relevant to your original posting. Unfortunately, I can only conclude that either you are not a scientist, or are one of those that can't be bothered in their perception to stoop to discussions that they don't control in entirety. He merely dealt with your vapid off-topic question, which you could google in 5 seconds, as was appropriate. Your whining after the fact is simple comedy. lol |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk